091901-3
M. Losurdo and M. M. Giangregorio
Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 091901 ͑2005͒
i.e., they are Zn cluster formed on the Zn-polar surface upon
interaction with atomic hydrogen.
The chemical modification of the O-polar and Zn-polar
surfaces has been corroborated using the high-resolution
XPS spectra of the Zn 2p3/2 and O 1s core levels of the Zn-
and O-polar surfaces. After exposure to atomic hydrogen, the
O 1s spectrum of the O-polar surface shows oxygen bonded
to zinc in the lattice identified at 531.3±0.1 eV and an in-
crease of the higher binding energy peak at 532.9±0.1 eV
1
8
indicative of OH on the sample surface. For the Zn-polar
surface, the Zn 2p3/2 peak fit components at 1021.7–1022.1
eV due to ZnO and an increase of the component at 1020 eV
due to Zn are seen upon hydrogenation, consistently with the
reactivity highlighted by ellipsometry.
In summary, the interaction of atomic hydrogen with Zn-
polar and O-polar ZnO surfaces has been investigated and
monitored in real time by spectroscopic ellipsometry. It has
been found that the reactivity of ZnO towards atomic hydro-
gen strongly depends on polarity. The interaction with the
O-polar ZnO results in atomically flat and cleaned OH ter-
minated surfaces. In contrast, Zn-polar ZnO strongly reacts
with atomic hydrogen yielding lattice disruption and Zn
clusters.
The authors dedicate this work to Dr. Giovanni Bruno at
IMIP-CNR for his personal efforts in sustaining the authors
during this research activity. The authors acknowledge Dr.
Jeff Nause, President of Cermet, Inc., Atlanta GA, for pro-
viding the ZnO substrates. They also thank the Ministero
dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca ͑MIUR͒ for
financial support.
1
D. M. Bagnall, Y. F. Chen, Z. Zhu, T. Yao, S. Koyama, M. Y. Shen, and T.
Goto, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 2230 ͑1997͒.
J. B. Hansen, in Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis, edited by G. Ertl,
2
FIG. 3. ͑Color online͒ 5 mϫ5 m AFM images of the ͓͑a͒, ͑b͔͒ O- an
͑c͒,͑d͔͒ Zn-polar ZnO surfaces before and after exposure to atomic hydro-
gen; ͑e͒ and ͑f͒ are the 1 mϫ1 m AFM and surface potential images of
the hydrogen treated Zn-polar surfaces. The 1 mϫ1 m 3D view and
corresponding line profiles of the Zn-polar surface after exposure to atomic
hydrogen are also shown.
H. Knotzinger, and J. Weitkamp ͑Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1997͒.
͓
3
Y. M. Strzhemechny, J. Nemergut, P. E. Smith, J. Bae, D. C. Look, and L.
J. Brillson, J. Appl. Phys. 94, 4256 ͑2003͒, and references therein.
4
B. Meyer and D. Marx, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, L89 ͑2003͒.
5
B. Theys, V. Sallet, F. Jomard, A. Lusson, J. F. Rommeluere, and Z.
Teukam, J. Appl. Phys. 91, 3922 ͑2002͒.
N. Ohashi, T. Ishigaki, N. Okada, T. Sekiguchi, and H. Haneda, Appl.
6
1
7
K, respectively, explaining the fast and nonsaturating kinet-
ics observed in Fig. 2.
Phys. Lett. 80, 2869 ͑2002͒.
A. Y. Polyakov, N. B. Smirnov, A. V. Govorkov, K. Ip, M. E. Overberg, Y.
7
W. Heo, D. P. Norton, S. J. Pearton, B. Luo, F. Ren, and J. M. Zavada, J.
The damage and reduction to Zn of the Zn-polar surface
have also been corroborated by AFM and XPS data.
Figure 3 shows AFM images of the Zn- and O-polar
ZnO surfaces before and after exposure to atomic hydrogen.
Before any treatment the surfaces of the ZnO wafer have
many scratches and pits. The morphology of the O-polar
ZnO surface is almost unchanged after the atomic hydrogen
exposure consistently with the absence of reactivity high-
lighted by ellipsometry. In contrast, the morphology of the
Zn-polar surface drastically changes upon interaction with
atomic hydrogen and shows bumps/clusters and submicron
pits approximately 100 nm in diameter and 5 nm deep. The
detail in the 1 mϫ1 m image and the corresponding sur-
face potential image with the line profiles put in evidence
that the clusters, although they are higher than the ZnO sur-
face, have a surface potential lower than the ZnO surface,
while no variation of the surface potential is observed for the
pits. Therefore, the pits are chemically equal to ZnO, while
the clusters are chemically different from the ZnO surface,
Appl. Phys. 94, 400 ͑2003͒.
8
K. Ip, M. E. Overberg, Y. W. Heo, D. P. Norton, S. J. Pearton, C. E. Stutz,
B. Luo, F. Ren, D. C. Look, and J. M. Zavada, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 385
͑2003͒.
Y. Segawa, A. Ohtomo, M. Kawasaki, Z. K. Tang, P. Yu, and G. K. L.
9
Wong, Phys. Status Solidi B 202, 669 ͑1997͒.
1
0
V. Kirilyuk, A. R. A. Zauner, P. C. M. Christianen, J. L. Weyher, P. R.
Hageman, and P. K. Larsen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 2355 ͑2000͒.
R. Dimitrov, M. Murphy, J. Smart, W. Schaff, J. R. Shealy, L. F. Eastman,
O. Ambacher, and M. Stutzmann, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 3375 ͑2000͒.
C. J. Sun, P. Kung, A. Saxler, H. Ohsato, E. Bigan, M. Razeghi, and D. K.
Gaskill, J. Appl. Phys. 76, 236 ͑1994͒.
11
1
1
2
3
L. K. Li, M. J. Jurkovic, W. I. Wang, J. M. Van Hove, and P. P. Chow,
Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 1740 ͑2000͒.
14
A. Wander and N. M. Harrison, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 2312 ͑2001͒.
M. Kunat, S. G. Girol, T. Becker, U. Burghaus, and C. Woll, Phys. Rev. B
66, 081402 ͑2002͒.
1
5
1
1
6
7
G. Kresse, O. Dulub, and U. Diebold, Phys. Rev. B 68, 245409 ͑2003͒.
T. Becker, S. Hovel, C. Boas, M. Kunat, U. Burghaus, and C. Woll, Surf.
Sci. Lett. 502, 486 ͑2001͒.
B. J. Coppa, C. C. Fulton, P. J. Hartlieb, R. F. Davis, B. J. Rodriguez, B.
J. Shields, and R. J. Nemanich, J. Appl. Phys. 95, 5956 ͑2004͒.
1
8
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
28.42.202.150 On: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:53:08
1