pubs.acs.org/Langmuir
©
2010 American Chemical Society
Imidazolium Bromide-Based Ionic Liquid Assisted Improved Activity of
Trypsin in Cationic Reverse Micelles
Sisir Debnath, Dibyendu Das, Sounak Dutta, and Prasanta Kumar Das*
Department of Biological Chemistry, Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science Jadavpur,
Kolkata - 700 032, India
Received March 9, 2009. Revised Manuscript Received January 18, 2010
The present work reports the imidazolium-based ionic liquids (ILs) assisted enhancement in activity of water-pool
solubilized enzyme trypsin in cationic reverse micelles of CTAB. A set of imidazolium ILs (1-alkyl-3-methyl imidazolium
bromides) were prepared with varying lengths of their side arm which results in the differential location of these organic salts
in the reverse micelles. The different ILs offered varied activating effects on the biocatalyst. The activity of trypsin improved
∼
30-300% in the presence of 0.1-10 mM of different ILs in reverse micelles of CTAB. Trypsin showed ∼300% (4-fold)
increment in its activity in the presence of IL 2 (1-ethyl-3-methyl imidazolium bromide, EMIMBr) compared to that observed
in the absence of IL in CTAB reverse micelles. The imidazolium moiety of the IL, resembling the histidine amino acid
-
component of the catalytic triad of hydrolases and its Br counterion, presumably increases the nucleophilicity of water in the
vicinity of the enzyme by forming a hydrogen bond that facilitates the enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis of the ester. However, the
ILs with increasing amphiphilic character had little to no effect on the activity of trypsin due to their increased distance from
the biocatalyst, as they tend to get localized toward the interfacial region of the aggregates. Dynamic light scattering
experimentation was carried out in the presence of ILs to find a possible correlation between the trypsin activity and the size of
the aggregates. In concurrence with the observed highest activity in the presence of IL 2, the circular dichroism (CD) spectrum
of trypsin in CTAB reverse micelles doped with IL 2 exhibited the lowest mean residue ellipticity (MRE), which is closest to
that of the native protein in aqueous buffer.
Introduction
applications. Among these confined systems, water-in-oil (w/o)
microemulsions (also known as reverse micelles) are very attrac-
tive hosts for enzyme-catalyzed reactions, because they can solu-
Enzymology in organized assemblies has been an area of wide
research interest for the past few decades because of its potential
3-5
1-5
bilize both hydrophobic and hydrophilic substrates/reactants.
in biotechnological applications. Studies on structure and acti-
vity of enzymes particularly in confined media have always shown
considerable significance from basic research to technological
W/o microemulsions are optically transparent, macroscopically
isotropic, thermodynamically stable nanometer scale aggregates
of water and surfactant in apolar solvent. In our previous studies,
we have shown particularly in the case of surface-active enzymes,
lipase and horseradish peroxidase (HRP), how the efficiency of
these enzymes was progressively improved in cationic w/o micro-
emulsions by changing the microstructural parameters of the self-
organized aggregates including headgroup hydrophilicity, size,
geometry, nature of counterion, and hydrophobic tail length of
*
(
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bcpkd@iacs.res.in.
1) (a) Eicke, H. F.; Shepherd, T. C.; Steinmann, A. J. Colloid Interface Sci.
976, 56, 168. (b) Zana, R.; Lang, J. In Solution Behavior of Surfactants, Mittal, K. L.,
Fendler, E. J., Eds.; Plenum: New York, 1982; Vol. 2. (c) Fendler, J. H. Acc. Chem. Res.
976, 9, 153. (d) Silber, J. J.; Biasutti, M. A.; Abuin, E. B.; Lissi, E. Adv. Colloid
Interface Sci. 1999, 82, 189. (e) Biasutti, M. A.; Abuin, E. B.; Silber, J. J.; Correa,
N. M.; Lissi, E. A. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2008, 136, 1. (f) Stenius, P. Reverse
Micelles, Luisi, P. L., Straub, B. E., Eds.; Plenum: New York, 1984; p 1. (g) Shinshi, M.;
Sugihara, T.; Osakai, T.; Goto, M. Langmuir 2006, 22, 5937. (h) Kimura, M.; Michizoe,
J.; Oakazaki, S.; Furusaki, S.; Goto, M.; Tanaka, H.; Wariishi, H. Biotechnol. Bioeng.
1
1
6
the surfactant and also by addition of nonionic surfactant.
Remarkably, the cationic w/o microemulsion also served as a
2004, 88, 495.
(
2) (a) Holmberg, K. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 1994, 51, 137. (b) Paul, B. K.;
(4) (a) Lissi, E. A.; Abuin, E. B. Langmuir 2000, 16, 10084. (b) Luthi, P.; Luisi, P. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 7285. (c) Abuin, E.; Lissi, E; Duarte, R. Langmuir 2003,
19, 5374. (d) Ono, T.; Goto, M. Biochem. Eng. J. 2006, 28, 156. (e) Mahiuddin, S.;
Renoncourt, A.; Bauduin, P.; Touraud, D.; Kunz, W. Langmuir 2005, 21, 5259.
(f) Pinna, M. C.; Bauduin, P.; Touraud, D.; Monduzzi, M.; Ninham, B. W.; Kunz, W.
J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 16511.
Moulik, S. P. J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. 1997, 18, 301. (c) Bommarius, A. S.; Hatton,
T. A.; Wang, D. I. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 4515. (d) Maruyama, T.; Hosogi,
T.; Goto, M. Chem. Commun. 2007, 4450. (e) Moniruzzaman, M.; Kamiya, N.;
Nakashima, K.; Goto, M. ChemPhysChem 2008, 9, 689. (f) Biswas, R.; Das, A. R.;
Pradhan, T.; Touraud, D.; Kunz, W.; Mahiuddin, S. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 6620.
(
g) Stamatis, H.; Xenakis, A.; Kolisis, F. N. Biotechnol. Adv. 1999, 17, 293 and
references therein. (h) Hagen, A. J.; Hatton, T. A.; Wang, D. I. C. Biotechnol. Bioeng.
006, 95, 285.
3) (a) Azevedo, A. M.; Fonseca, L. P.; Graham, D.; Cabral, J. M. S.; Prazeres,
(5) (a) Abuin, E; Lissi, E.; Calderon, C. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007, 308, 573.
(b) Falcone, R. D.; Biasutti, M. A.; Correa, N. M.; Silber, J. J.; Lissi, E.; Abuin, E.
Langmuir 2004, 20, 5732. (c) Brissos, V.; Melo, E. P.; Martinho, J. M. G.; Cabral,
J. M. S. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 1784, 1326. (d) Carvalho, C. M. L.; Cabral, J. M. S.
Biochimie 2000, 82, 1063. (e) Mitra, D.; Chakraborty, I.; Bhattacharya, S. C.; Moulik, S. P.;
Roy, S.; Das, D.; Das, P. K. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 11314. (f) Carvalho, C. M. L.;
Aires-Barros, M. R.; Cabral, J. M. S. Langmuir 2000, 16, 3082. (g) Bauduin, P.; Touraud,
D.; Kunz, W.; Savelli, M. P.; Pulvin, S.; Ninham, B. W. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 292,
244. (h) Minofar, B.; Vacha, R.; Wahab, A.; Mahiuddin, S.; Kunz, W.; Jungwirth, P. J. Phys.
Chem. B 2006, 110, 15939.
(6) (a) Mitra, R. N.; Dasgupta, A.; Das, D.; Roy, S.; Debnath, S.; Das, P. K.
Langmuir 2005, 21, 12115. (b) Dasgupta, A.; Das, D.; Mitra, R. N.; Das, P. K. J. Colloid
Interface Sci. 2005, 289, 566. (c) Das, D.; Roy, S.; Mitra, R. N.; Dasgupta, A.; Das, P. K.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2005, 11, 4881. (d) Debnath, S.; Dasgupta, A.; Mitra, R. N.; Das, P. K.
Langmuir 2006, 22, 8732. (e) Dasgupta, A.; Das, D.; Das, P. K. Langmuir 2007, 23,
4137. (f) Das, D.; Das, P. K. Langmuir 2003, 19, 9114. (g) Shome, A.; Roy, S.; Das, P. K.
Langmuir 2007, 23, 4130. (h) Debnath, S.; Das, D.; Das, P. K. Biochem. Biophys. Res.
Commun. 2007, 356, 163.
2
(
D. M. F. Biocatal. Biotransfor. 2001, 19, 213. (b) Holmes, J. D.; Steytler, D. C.; Rees,
G. D.; Robinson, B. H. Langmuir 1998, 14, 6371. (c) Oldfield, C.; Freedman, R. B.;
Robinson, B. H. Faraday Discuss. 2005, 129, 247. (d) Komives, C. F.; Osborne, D. E.;
Russell, A. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 369. (e) Menger, F. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1991, 30, 1086. (f) Leodidis, E. B.; Hatton, T. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 6411.
(
g) Carlile, K.; Rees, G. D.; Robinson, B. H.; Steer, T. D.; Svensson, M. J. Chem. Soc.,
Faraday Trans. 1996, 92, 4701. (h) Walde, P.; Han, D.; Luisi, P. L. Biochemistry 1993,
2, 4029. (i) Yang, F. X.; Russell, A. J. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1995, 47, 60. (j) Martinek,
K.; Levashov, A. V.; Khmelnitsky, Y. L.; Klyachko, N. L.; Berezin, I. V. Science 1982,
18, 889. (k) Menger, F. M.; Yamada, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 6731.
l) Martinek, K.; Levashov, A. V.; Klyachko, N. L.; Khmelnitski, Y. L.; Berezin, I. V.
3
2
(
Eur. J. Biochem. 1986, 155, 453. (m) Martinek, K.; Levashov, A. V.; Klyachko, N. L.;
Kabanov, A. V.; Khmelnitsky, Y. L. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1989, 981, 161.
(
n) Yamada, Y.; Kuboi, R.; Komasawa, I. Biotechnol. Prog. 1993, 9, 468.
4
080 DOI: 10.1021/la9040419
Published on Web 02/09/2010
Langmuir 2010, 26(6), 4080–4086