4
T. GUO ꢀT Aꢁ.
petroleum ether, ꢀtOAc and n-BuOH, successively. The water soluble fraction (83 g) dissolved
in 300 mꢁ water was subjected to MCI gel CHP 20P (8 × 60 cm) and eluted with MeOH/H O
2
to obtain fraction 1 [1.0 ꢁ, H O], fraction 2 [0.6 ꢁ, MeOH/H O (10:90)], fraction 3 [0.6 ꢁ, MeOH/
2
2
H O (30:70)], fraction 4 [0.6 ꢁ, MeOH/H O (50:50)], fraction 5 [0.6 ꢁ, MeOH/H O (70:30)],
2
2
2
fraction 6 [1.0 ꢁ, MeOH]. Fraction 2 (12.9 g) was chromatographed on Toyopearl HW-40F
6 × 60 cm) using H O obtained fractions 2A–2ꢀ. Fraction 2B (0.9 g) was further purified by
(
2
Cosmosil 75 C -OPN (4 × 30 cm, eluted with H O → 10% MeOH) and MCI gel CHP 20P
1
8
2
(
5 × 40 cm, eluted with H O → 10% MeOH) to yield 7 (63.0 mg) and 6 (143.3 mg). Fraction
2
2
C (0.3 g) was subjected to MCI gel CHP 20P (5 × 40 cm, eluted with H O → 10% MeOH), then
2
separated by Toyopearl HW-40F (6 × 60 cm, eluted with H O) to give 5 (53.9 mg) and 2
2
(
9.2 mg). Fraction 3 (8.9 g) was subjected to Toyopearl HW-40F (6 × 60 cm, eluted with H O)
2
to obtained fraction 3A–3D. Fraction 3B (0.3 g) was further purified by MCI gel CHP 20P
5 × 40 cm, eluted with H O-20% MeOH) and Cosmosil 75 C -OPN (4 × 30 cm, eluted with
(
2
18
H O → 20% MeOH) to give 4 (6.5 mg) and 8 (10.2 mg). Fraction 3C (0.2 g) was chromato-
2
graphed on MCI gel CHP 20P (5 × 40 cm, eluted with H O → 20% MeOH) to yield 3 (23.2 mg).
2
Fraction 4 (9.4 g) was chromatographed on Toyopearl HW-40F (6 × 60 cm, eluted with H O)
2
to yield six fractions 4A–4F. Fraction 4C (0.2 g) was further purified by MCI gel CHP 20P
(
5 × 40 cm, eluted with 30–50% MeOH) and Cosmosil 75 C -OPN (4 × 30 cm, eluted with
18
30 → 50% MeOH) to give 9 (6.2 mg) and 11 (5 mg). Fraction 4D (0.1 g) was further purified
by Cosmosil 75 C -OPN (4 × 30 cm, eluted with 30 → 50% MeOH) and Toyopearl HW-40F
1
8
(
6 × 60 cm, eluted with H O) to give 10 (6.5 mg). Fraction 5 (5.8 g) was separated byToyopearl
2
HW-40F (6 × 60 cm) using H O as eluent to obtained fractions 5A–5C. Fraction 5B (0.3 g) was
2
further purified by Cosmosil 75 C -OPN (4 × 30 cm, eluted with 40% → 70% MeOH) and
1
8
Toyopearl HW-40F (6 × 60 cm, eluted with H O) to yield 12 (18.9 mg), 13 (7.4 mg) and 1
2
(
13.2 mg).
Compound 1: colourless oil.[ꢀ]D − 69.3 (c 0.10, H O); HR-ꢀSI-MS m/z 575.1739 [M + Na]+
2
0
◦
2
1
13
(Calcd for C H O Na, 575.1741); H and C NMR: see Table S1.
2
6
32 13
3
.4. Acid hydrolysis of 1
A solution of compounds 1 (1 mg) in 5% HCl (0.5 mꢁ) was heated (90 °C) for 2 h. After remov-
ing HCl by evaporation in vacuum, the mixture was diluted with H O and extracted with
2
ꢀtOAc. The aqueous layer was neutralised with 0.1 M NaOH and glucose was detected by
TꢁC analysis with authentic sugars: CHCl –MeOH–H O (14:6:1), Rf 0.13 (glucose); n-BuOH-
3
2
pyridine-H O (6:4:3), Rf 0.37 (glucose).
2
4
. Conclusion
The Z. armatum (Rutaceae) is widely distributed in China, which has been used as Traditional
Chinese Medicine. Chemical study on the stems of Z. armatum has resulted in the isolation
of a new phenylpropanoid glycoside, (7S,8R)-guaiacylglycerol-β-ferulic acid ether-7-O-β-d-
glucopyranoside (1), along with 12 known compounds. Compounds 2–8 and 11–13 were
first isolated from Rutaceae and others were isolated for the first time from Z. armatum.