4
784
N. X. Cuong et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 4782–4784
HO
O
OH
O
HO
HO
CH3
H C
OMe
3
OH
HO
HO
O
O
O
OH
HO
OH
CH3
MeO
CH OH
2
2
1
Figure 2. Key HMBC correlations of 1 and 2.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by VAST and partly by Priority
Research Centers Program through the National Research Founda-
tion of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science
and Technology (2009-0093815), Republic of Korea. The authors
are grateful to Institute of Chemistry, VAST and KBSI for provision
of spectroscopic instrument.
Supplementary data
References and notes
1.
2.
3.
Väänänen, H. K.; Liu, Y. K.; Lehenkari, P.; Uemara, T. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 1998, 6, 205.
Lecaille, F.; Kaleta, J.; Brömme, D. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 4459.
Bich, D. H.; Chung, D. Q.; Chuong, B. X.; Dong, N. T.; Dam, D. T.; Hien, P. V.; Lo, V.
N.; Mai, P. D.; Man, P. K.; Nhu, D. T.; Tap, N.; Toan, T.. In The Medicinal Plants and
Animals in Vietnam; Science and Technology Publishing House: Hanoi, Vietnam,
2004; Vol. 2.
Figure 3. Effect of 4 and 5 on RANKL-induced osteoclast formation. BMMs were
cultured with 10 M of compound 4 or 5, 30 ng/mL of M-CSF and 100 ng/mL of
RANKL. After 5 days, cells were stained for TRAP activity, and the TRAP-positive
multinucleated cells with three or more nuclei/cell were counted by light
microscopy. *p <0.05, **p <0.005 versus RANKL-treated cells.
l
4. Cuong, N. X.; Minh, C. V.; Kiem, P. V.; Huong, H. T.; Ban, N. K.; Nhiem, N. X.;
Tung, N. H.; Jung, J. W.; Kim, H. J.; Kim, S. Y.; Kim, J. A.; Kim, J. H. J. Nat. Prod.
2009, 72, 1673.
5.
Kiem, P. V.; Tri, M. D.; Tuong, L. V. D.; Tung, N. H.; Hanh, N. N.; Quang, T. H.;
Cuong, N. X.; Minh, C. V.; Choi, E. M.; Kim, J. H. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2008, 56,
1270.
6
.
.
Kiem, P. V.; Quang, T. H.; Huong, T. T.; Nhung, L. T. H.; Cuong, N. X.; Minh, C. V.;
Choi, E. M.; Kim, J. H. Arch. Pham. Res. 2008, 31, 823.
Yen, P. H.; Kiem, P. V.; Nhiem, N. X.; Tung, N. H.; Quang, T. H.; Minh, C. V.; Kim,
J. W.; Choi, E. M.; Kim, Y. H. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2007, 30, 1179.
Table 1
7
The NMR spectroscopic data of 1 and 2
2
5
1a
2b
(J in Hz)
8.
Lawsoniaside A (1): amorphous white powder, ½
a
ꢁ
+1.5 (c 0.50, MeOH); IR(KBr)
Position
D
m
max 3428 (OH), 2925 (CH), 1730 (C@O), 1645 (aromatic ring), 1075 (C–O–
ꢂ1
1
1
3
d
C
d
H
(J in Hz)
d
C
d
H
C) cm ; H NMR (CD OD, 500 MHz) and C NMR (CD OD, 125 MHz) are given
3
3
+
+
in Table 1; ESIMS m/z 409 [M+Na] ; FTICRMS m/z 409.14679 [M+Na] (calcd for
Aglycone
25
D
C
18
H
26
O
9
Na, 409.14745). Lawsoniaside B (2): amorphous white powder, ½
a
ꢁ
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
112.72
159.96
109.18
161.82
111.61
154.88
210.09
46.95
19.62
14.33
8.27
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
132.57
104.51
152.67
133.92
152.67
104.51
128.41
130.12
61.41
—
6.72 s
—
—
—
6.72 s
6.47 d (16.0)
6.33 dt (16.0, 5.0)
4.11 t (5.0)
ꢂ15.5 (c 0.50, MeOH); IR(KBr)
m
max 3435 (OH), 2917 (CH), 1652 (aromatic ring),
ꢂ1
1
13
1
1
3
084 (C–O–C) cm
;
6 6
H NMR (DMSO-d , 500 MHz) and C NMR (DMSO-d ,
25 MHz) are given in Table 1; ESIMS m/z 395 [M+Na]+; FTICRMS m/z
+
95.13183 [M+Na] (calcd for C17
H
24
O
9
Na, 395.13180).
9. Deyama, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1983, 31, 2993.
10. Vermes, B.; Seligmann, O.; Wagner, H. Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 3087.
11. Ullah, N.; Ahmad, S.; Malik, A. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1999, 47, 114.
12. Niwa, M.; Sugino, H.; Takashima, S.; Sakai, T.; Wu, Y. C.; Wu, T. S.; Kuoh, C. S.
Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1991, 39, 2422.
3.17 dd (7.0, 13.5)
1.66 m
0.94 t (7.5)
2.05 s
1
1
1
0
1
2
13. Kreher, B.; Neszelyi, A.; Wagner, H. Phytochemistry 1990, 29, 3633.
14. Kabayashi, H.; Karasawa, H.; Miyase, T.; Fukushima, S. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1985,
3
3, 1452.
9.81
2.21 s
1
1
5. Taira, J.; Nanbu, H.; Ueda, K. Food Chem. 2009, 115, 1221.
6. Chen, X.; Cui, L.; Duan, X.; Ma, B.; Zhong, Da. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2006, 34,
OMe
Glucose
56.34
3.77 s
1345.
0
1
105.72
75.70
77.88
71.91
78.02
62.93
4.52 d (8.0)
3.56 dd (8.0, 9.0)
3.42 t (9.0)
3.35 t (9.0)
3.12 m
102.58
74.15
76.51
69.93
77.14
60.89
4.91 d (5.0)
17. Melville, C. R.; Gould, S. J. J. Nat. Prod. 1994, 57, 597.
18. Chang, X.; Li, W.; Koike, K.; Wu, L.; Nikaido, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2006, 54, 748.
19. Tian, L. W.; Zhang, Y. J.; Qu, C.; Wang, Y. F.; Yang, C. R. J. Nat. Prod. 2010, 73, 160.
20. Coskun, M.; Sakushima, A.; Nishibe, S.; Hisada, S. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1982, 30,
4102.
0
c
2
3.21
0
3.20c
3
0
0
4
3.15 m
3.05 m
3.42 dd (5.0, 12.0)
3.59 dd (2.0, 12.0)
5
0
6
3.60 dd (5.5, 12.0)
21. Greca, M. D.; Ferrara, M.; Fiorentino, A.; Monaco, P.; Previtera, L. Phytochemistry
1998, 49, 1299.
3.72 dd (2.0, 12.0)
2
2. El Sayed, K. A.; Yousaf, D. M.; Hamann, M. T.; Avery, M. A.; Kelly, M.; Wipf, P. J.
a
b
c
Measured in CD
Measured in DMSO-d
Overlapped signals, assignments were done by HSQC and HMBC experiments.
3
OD.
Nat. Prod. 2002, 65, 1547.
6
.