Journal of the American Chemical Society
Al O ) and subsequent recrystallization. With similar process,
(
2
3
the larger metal−organic ligand L2 was also successfully
synthesized. The structures of L1 and L2 were undoubtedly
characterized by NMR spectra and ESI-MS (the detailed
analyses are available in the Supporting Information). As
1
observed from Figure 3, the H NMR of L2 showed four
3
,5
singlets around 9.13 ppm assigned to the tpyH ′ ′ protons for
2
+
⟨
Tpy-Ru -Tpy⟩ moieties and two singlets at 8.88 and 8.85
3
,5
ppm with 1:1 integrated ratio attributed to the tpyH ′ ′ of free
terpyridyl fragments, and all of signal assignments were
performed by 2D COSY and 2D-NOESY NMR spectra
(
Figure S32). As well, the ESI-MS spectrum of complex L2
showed the clear and sequential peaks at 838.83(7+),
025.28(6+), 1286.31(5+), and 1677.85(4+), supporting the
1
desired structure (Figure S38).
The self-assembly of Russian-Doll-Like Cubes C1 (or C2)
was performed by precisely mixing ligand L1 (or L2; 1 equiv)
and Zn(NO ) ·6H O (3 equiv) in CH CN at 85 °C for 24 h,
3
2
2
3
giving a translucent red solution. After cooling to room
temperature, excess lithium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide
(
LiNTf ) solution was added to generate a precipitate, which
2
was washed with plenty of H O to give complexes C1 (or C2).
The H NMR spectrum of cubes C1 and C2 was showed in
2
1
Figures S49 and 3, respectively, in which a broad signal pattern
was observed due to the slow tumbling motion resulting from
28
1
the formation of giant complexes. However, both H NMR
results were similar to those for corresponding ligands L1 and
L2, indicating that the resultant products are highly sym-
metrical. Moreover, all protons signals could be completely
assigned via the 2D-COSY and NOESY NMR spectra (The
detailed analyses are available in the Supporting Information).
In comparison of metal−organic ligand L2, the obvious
resonance peak change for complex C2 was easily found,
including obvious downfield shifts from 8.9 to 9.1 ppm for the
3
,5
3 ,3
signals of tpyH ′ ′ and tpyH ′ ″ of free terpyridine segments,
owing to the tangential electron-withdrawing effects upon
coordination and a dramatic upfield shift (δ = 0.9 ppm) for
Figure 4. (A) ESI-MS and (B) 2D ESI TWIM-MS plot (m/z vs drift
time) of complex C1 and (C) ESI-MS and (D) 2D ESI TWIM-MS
plot (m/z vs drift time) of complex C2. The charge states of intact
assemblies are marked.
6
,6
tpyH ′ ″ protons due to the electron shielding effect (Figure
2
9
3
B). Similar signals shift were also observed for complex C1
(Figure S49). Such characteristic change of the tpy moieties
demonstrates that the assembled complex was designedly
produced. Single and discrete self-assembled structures of C1
and C2 were further supported by diffusion-ordered NMR
spectroscopy (DOSY) spectrum (Figure 3C), in which all of
resonance signals for the complex were on a narrow band with
log D = −10.03 (C1) and −10.12 (C2), respectively,
supporting the respective formation of one discrete species
ular cubes. Unfortunately, the experimental isotope pattern of
each charge state for both C1 and C2 were indistinct possibly
due to resolution limits by high molecular weight and/or the
large cavity encapsulating the solvent molecules. Alternatively,
the ESI-TWIM-MS experiments afforded additional structural
evidence, in which one dominant series of continuous charge
+
+
signal distributions ranging from 30 to 39 derived from
+
+
in CD CN. In addition, the experimental hydrodynamic radius
complex C1 and 31 to 44 for complex C2 with a narrow drift
time were discernible, and no signal peaks of other oligomer
were found, which indicated that the formation here was
discrete and rigid structures, as well no other isomers or
structural conformers exist (Figure 4B,D).
3
(
rH) of C1 and C2 which derived from the Stokes−Einstein
equation was ca. 6.2 and 7.4 nm, respectively.
The composition and structure of Russian-doll-like cubes C1
and C2 were fully characterized by ESI mass spectrum and
traveling-wave ion mobility-mass spectrometry (TWIM-MS).
As displayed in Figure 4A,C, a series of sequential peaks with
Size Characterization by Transmission Electron
Microscopy (TEM), Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM),
and Small-Angle X-ray Scattering (SAXS). Many attempts
to grow X-ray single crystals for Russian-doll-like cubes C1 and
C2 were unsuccessful to date probably because the huge
molecular frameworks and solvent molecules or counterions in
the cavity. To provide more structural evidence, the TEM and
AFM measurements were performed by drop-casting dilute
+
+
+
charge states varying from 24 to 46 for complex C1 and 31
+
to 51 for complex C2 were detected, respectively. These
continuous signals matched well with the simulated m/z from
t h e t h e o r e t i c a l m o l e c u l a r f o r m u l a o f
112+
−
(
Zn Ru C2680H1760N336O ) ·112(NTf ) with the molec-
24 32 24 2
ular weight 75232.41 Da for complex C1 and
112+
−
−6
(
Zn Ru C2872H1888N336O ) ·112(NTf ) with the molec-
solutions of C1 and C2 in MeCN at a concentration of ∼10
2
4
32
24
2
ular weight 77667.55 Da for complex C2, demonstrating the
M onto superthin carbon film-coated Cu grid or freshly cleaved
formation of desired octameric Russian-doll-like supramolec-
mica sheet. As depicted in Figure 5C,D, TEM images displayed
2
540
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 2537−2544