Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
Article
Metal-free directed sp2-C–H borylation
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1640-2
Received: 9 July 2019
Jiahang Lv1,2,6, Xiangyang Chen3,6, Xiao-Song Xue3,4, Binlin Zhao1, Yong Liang1, Minyan Wang1,
Liqun Jin5, Yu Yuan2, Ying Han2, Yue Zhao1, Yi Lu1, Jing Zhao1, Wei-Yin Sun1, Kendall. N. Houk3*
& Zhuangzhi Shi1,2,4
*
Accepted: 4 September 2019
Published online: 30 September 2019
Organoboron reagents are important synthetic intermediates that have a key role in
the construction of natural products, pharmaceuticals and organic materials1. The
discovery of simpler, milder and more efcient approaches to organoborons can open
additional routes to diverse substances2–5. Here we show a general method for the
directed C–H borylation of arenes and heteroarenes without the use of metal
catalysts. C7- and C4-borylated indoles are produced by a mild approach that is
compatible with a broad range of functional groups. The mechanism, which is
established by density functional theory calculations, involves BBr3 acting as both a
reagent and a catalyst. The potential utility of this strategy is highlighted by the
downstream transformation of the formed boron species into natural products and
drug scafolds.
In order to achieve excellent site-selectivity, organoboron compounds conditions (including temperatures of up to 300ꢀ°C)12 and the use
have typically been synthesized by directed ortho-metalation (usually of aluminium salts13. Replacing the transition-metal-catalysed process
lithiation)6—a process that is not compatible with many sensitive func- by a mild metal-free strategy (Fig. 1c) offers an alternative pathway to
tional groups (Fig. 1a). During the past two decades, transition-metal- C–H borylation that is practical, inexpensive and environmentally
catalysed directed C–H activation7,8 has emerged as a powerful tool for benign15
.
the construction of C–B bonds9–11 (Fig. 1b). However, these reactions
The indole moiety is an important structural motif16,17. Several recent
rely mostly on precious-metal catalysts with ligands, which can be studies have reported indole C–H functionalization without the use of
a substantial limitation—particularly when considering large-scale transition metals (Fig. 1d), including a frustrated-Lewis-pair-catalysed
syntheses and the need to remove toxic trace metals in pharmaceuti- C–H borylation of indoles at the most electron-rich C3 position18 and a
cal products. Early studies involving directed C–H borylation without method to access C2-silylated indoles by KOtBu-catalysed C–H silyla-
transition-metal catalysts, assisted by strongly coordinating groups tion19. Installation of pivaloyl groups at the N1 or C3 positions of indoles
such as pyridine, have been reported12–14. Although very good levels of enables selective delivery of the boron species to the unfavourable C7
regioselectivity can be achieved, such reactions usually require harsh or C4 positions20–25 (Fig. 1d).
a
d
DG
H
DG
[B]
DG
Li
[B]
R-Li
Bpin
N
FLP
Directed
ortho-metalation
HBpin
N
O
b
H
H
Me
H
3
tBu
4
Ref. 18
Bpin
Bpin
5
DG
H
DG
DG
[B]
BX3
Then pinacol
tBu
TM catalyst
[B]
H
2
6
N
TM = Ir, Rh,
Pd, Ru...
O
TM
1
7
R
Directed C–H
transmetalation
KOtBu
HSiR3
c
R3Si
Boron
chemistry
DG
FG
DG
H
DG
Controlled by
Chelation effect
N
N
[B]
Ts
Me
Electronic effect
Metal-free
Ref. 19
This work
[B]
Directed C–H
borylation
C–C and C–Het
bond formation
Fig. 1 | Strategies for directed C–H bond borylation. a, Directed ortho-
metalation. b, Transition-metal-catalysed C–H borylation. c, Metal-free
directed C–H borylation. d, Transition-metal-free site-selective C–H
functionalization of indoles. DG, directing group; FG, functional group; FLP,
frustrated Lewis pair; Het, heteroatom; pin, pinacolate; TM, transition metal.
1State Key Laboratory of Coordination Chemistry, Chemistry and Biomedicine Innovation Center (ChemBIC), School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
2College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China. 3Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA,
USA. 4State Key Laboratory of Elemento-organic Chemistry, College of Chemistry, Nankai University, Tianjin, China. 5College of Chemical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology,
Hangzhou, China. 6These authors contributed equally: Jiahang Lv, Xiangyang Chen. *e-mail: houk@chem.ucla.edu; shiz@nju.edu.cn
336 | Nature | Vol 575 | 14 November 2019