Nitrosation of Olefins and Dienes
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 64, No. 19, 1999 7127
mL of CH2Cl2, and 0.4 g (4.8 mmol) of 3a in 20 mL of CH2Cl2
was obtained 0.75 g (70%) of ethyl sulfate of 2-hydroxyhexanal
(4a ) (eluent hexane/AcOEt/CHCl3 ) 1:3:3; colorless oil, Rf
0.16): IR 1760, 1400, 1200 cm-1 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 0.91
;
(narrow t, 3H), 1.20-1.55 (m, 4H), 1.43 (t, 3H, J ) 7.1 Hz),
1.87 (m, 2H), 4.45 (m, 2H), 4.83 (dd, 1H, J ) 7.0, 5.5 Hz), 9.64
(s, 1H). Anal. Calcd for C8H16O5S: C, 42.84; H, 7.19. Found:
C, 42.75; H, 7.19.
In conclusion, we have developed a new one-pot
transformation for terminal olefins and dienes into
R-substituted aldehydes and internal olefins into the
corresponding ketones. The studied reaction can be
considered a versatile technique for olefin functionaliza-
tion, affording valuable synthetic intermediates. The
common feature of the mechanism is that, unlike a
typical electrophilic addition, the nitrosation reaction
seems to proceed via a π-complex, not a σ-intermediate.
Insignificant development of carbocationic character in
such π-complexes could then explain the known “reluc-
tance” of nitrosation reactions to undergo skeletal rear-
rangements.
Rea ction of 1-Hep ten e (3b). From 1.28 g (16.0 mmol) of
SO3 in 25 mL of CH2Cl2, 1.64 g (22.0 mmol) of EtONO in 20
mL of CH2Cl2, and 0.71 g (7.2 mmol) of 3b in 20 mL of CH2Cl2
was obtained 1.29 g (75%) of ethyl sulfate of 2-hydroxyheptanal
(4b) (eluent hexane/AcOEt ) 3:1; colorless oil, Rf 0.23): IR
1740, 1400, 1200 cm-1; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 0.9 (narrow t, 3H),
1.20-1.50 (m, 6H), 1.4 (t, 3H, J ) 7.1 Hz), 1.7-2.0 (m, 2H),
4.4 (m, 2H), 4.78 (dd, 1H, J ) 7.7, 5.6 Hz), 9.6 (s, 1H); 13C
NMR δ 13.8, 14.4, 22.1, 23.8, 29.5, 31.0, 70.1, 85.5, 196.1. Anal.
Calcd for C9H18O5S: C, 45.36; H, 7.61. Found: C, 45.54; H,
7.63.
Rea ction of 1-Octen e (3c). From 1.67 g (21.0 mmol) of
SO3 in 30 mL of CH2Cl2, 2.13 g (28.4 mmol) of EtONO in 25
mL of CH2Cl2, and 1.06 g (9.5 mmol) of 3c in 25 mL of CH2Cl2
was obtained, 1.67 g (70%) of ethyl sulfate of 2-hydroxyoctanal
(4c) (eluent heptane/AcOEt ) 3:1; colorless oil, Rf 0.24): IR
1740, 1400, 1200 cm-1; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 0.9 (narrow t, 3H),
1.1-2.1 (group of m, 13H), 4.3 (m, 2H), 4.7 (m, 1H), 9.5 (s,
1H). Anal. Calcd for C10H20O5S: C, 47.60; H, 7.99. Found: C,
47.48; H, 7.89.
Rea ction of Eth ylen e (5). To a solution of 1.27 g (16.0
mmol) of SO3 in 25 mL of CH2Cl2 was added the solution of
2.38 g (32.0 mmol) of EtONO in 20 mL of CH2Cl2 dropwise
while the temperature was maintained at -55 °C. After 0.5 h
of stirring at this temperature, gaseous ethylene was passed
through the reaction mixture for 2 h. Further treatment was
performed according to the general procedure and gave 0.45 g
(40%, based on SO3) of ethyl sulfate of glycolaldehyde (6)
(eluent hexane/AcOEt ) 2:1; yellowish oil, Rf 0.15): IR 1720,
1380, 1200 cm-1; 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.4 (t, 3H, J ) 7.1), 4.0-
4.9 (m, 4H), 9.3 (s, 1H).
Exp er im en ta l Section
Gen er a l. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3.
All reactions were followed by TLC with precoated aluminum
TLC plates (silica gel, Silufol, Czech Republic). Preparative
column chromatography involved silica gel (Silpearl) and ethyl
acetate-hexane mixtures as eluent. All solvents and reagents
were additionally purified and dried by standard techniques.
Ethyl nitrite was synthesized as previously reported.18 SO3 was
obtained from 60% oleum. Freshly distilled SO3 was used,
which was weighed and dissolved in CH2Cl2.
Com p u ta tion s. Ab initio and DFT computations were
performed on a dual mips R10000 processor SGI Octane
workstation equipped with 1GB memory using Gaussian 94
Revision E.2 computational package.19 The input geometries
were created and preoptimized using a force field geometry
optimization as implemented in Chem3D (Cambridgesoft). Full
geometry optimizations were then performed at B3LYP/6-31G-
(d) and MP2/6-311G(d) levels of theory. Single point computa-
tions at the MP4/6-311G(d) level of theory were performed for
the series of nitrosoformaldoximes (Table 2). Self-consistent
reaction field (SCRF) computations were then performed to
account for solvent polarity effects utilizing SCIPCM. These
also were run as single point calculations without further
geometry optimization, MP4-SCIPCM/6-311G(d)//MP2/6-311G-
(d) (Table 2).
Gen er a l P r oced u r e for th e Ad d ition Rea ction . A three-
neck flask fitted with an addition funnel, stirrer, and argon
inlet was charged with a solution of SO3 in CH2Cl2. The
mixture was cooled to -50 °C, and a solution of EtONO in
CH2Cl2 was added dropwise while the temperature was
maintained at -50 to -30 °C. The resulting mixture was
stirred for 0.5 h at this temperature, and a solution of olefin
in CH2Cl2 was added dropwise at -50 to -30 °C. Further
workup involved 1 h of stirring at -50 °C, after which the
temperature was allowed to rise slowly to room temperature.
After treatment with cold water, extraction with CHCl3, and
drying over MgSO4, the solvent was evaporated in vacuo.
Crude product was chromatographed.
Rea ction of Isop r en e (7). (a ) In Con d ition s of Kin etic
Con tr ol. To a solution of 1.3 g (16.3 mmol) of SO3 in 30 mL of
CH2Cl2 was added the solution of 2.65 g (35.3 mmol) of EtONO
in 25 mL of CH2Cl2 dropwise while the temperature was
maintained at -55 °C. After 0.5 h of stirring at this temper-
ature, the solution of 0.48 g (7.1 mmol) of 7 in 18 mL of CH2-
Cl2 was added dropwise. After 1 h of stirring at -55 °C, the
1:1 water-ethanol mixture (20 mL) was added as quickly as
possible. Further treatment was performed according to the
general procedure. As a result, 0.3 g (42%) of a mixture of Z-
and E-isomers of 4-hydroxy-2-methylbut-2-enal (9 and 8)20 was
obtained (eluent hexane/AcOEt ) 3:1; colorless oil, Rf 0.32):
1
IR 3600-3200, 1690, 1650 cm-1; H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.85 (q,
3H of 8, J ) 7.0 Hz), 1.92 (q, 3H of 9, J ) 7.0 Hz), 5.27 (dq,
2H of 8, J ) 7.0, 1.7 Hz), 5.41 (dq, 2H of 9, J ) 7.0, 1.7 Hz),
6.37 (tq, 1H of 9, J ) 7.0, 1.7 Hz), 6.46 (tq, 1H of 8, J ) 7.0,
1.7 Hz), 9.48 (s, 1H of 8), 10.07 (s, 1H of 9); 13C NMR δ 16.81
(1C of 9), 19.30 (1C of 8), 67.21 (1C of 9), 68.45 (1C of 8), 134.82
(1C of 9), 140.37 (1H of 8), 140.60 (1C of 9), 147.20 (1C of 8),
190.33 (1C of 9), 193.53 (1C of 8). Anal. Calcd for C5H8O2: C,
59.98; H, 8.05. Found: C, 59.85; H, 7.93.
(b) In Con d ition s of Th er m od yn a m ic Con tr ol. From
1.21 g (15.0 mmol) of SO3 in 70 mL of CH2Cl2, 2.27 g (30.0
mmol) of EtONO in 20 mL of CH2Cl2, and 0.51 g (7.5 mmol) of
7 in 15 mL of CH2Cl2 was obtained 0.59 g (78%) of 4-hydroxy-
2-methylbut-2(E)-enal (8) (eluent hexane/AcOEt ) 3:1; color-
Rea ction of 1-Hexen e (3a ). From 0.95 g (11.9 mmol) of
SO3 in 20 mL of CH2Cl2, 1.78 g (23.7 mmol) of EtONO in 16
1
less oil, Rf 0.32): IR 3600-3200, 1690, 1650 cm-1; H NMR
(18) Blatt, A., Ed. Organic Syntheses; Wiley: New York, 1946;
Collect. Vol. 2, p 204.
(CDCl3) δ 1.85 (q, 3H, J ) 7.0 Hz), 5.27 (dq, 2H, J ) 7.0, 1.7
Hz), 6.46 (tq, 1H, J ) 7.0, 1.7 Hz), 9.48 (s, 1H); 13C NMR δ
19.30, 68.45, 140.37, 147.20, 193.53. Anal. Calcd for C5H8O2:
C, 59.98; H, 8.05. Found: C, 59.90; H, 7.97.
(19) Frisch, M. J .; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Gill, P. M. W.;
J ohnson, B. G.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J . R.; Keith, T.; Petersson,
G. A.; Montgomery, J . A.; Raghavachari, K.; Al-Laham, M. A.;
Zakrzewski, V. G.; Ortiz, J . V.; Foresman, J . B.; Cioslowski, J .;
Stefanov, B. B.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Peng, C. Y.; Ayala,
P. Y.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J . L.; Replogle, E. S.; Gomperts,
R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J .; Binkley, J . S.; Defrees, D. J .; Baker, J .;
Stewart, J . P.; Head-Gordon, M.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J . A. Gaussian
94, Revision E.2; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1995.
(c) In Con d ition s of Kin etic Con tr ol a t 1:1 Stoich iom -
etr y of 1 to 7. Reaction was performed according to the
(20) Ranu, B. C.; Sarkar, D. C. Synth. Commun. 1987, 17, 155.