Monlien et al.
at T ) 298.1 K and I ) 0.60 mol kg-1. If the pH differed by more
than 0.1 unit between the beginning and the end of an NMR
measurement, the data were not accepted.
by the two-term equation5 kobs ) k1 + k2 [ligand]. The
second-order rate constant k2 refers to a direct attack of the
ligand on the substrate, and the pseudo-first-order rate
constant k1, to the attack of the solvent. The value of the k1
term depends only on the nature the solvent. The square-
planar complexes have characteristic kinetic behavior involv-
ing a five-coordinate intermediate or transition state. Early
exchange studies6,7 with heavy-metal cyanide complexes
were monitored with counting techniques using 14C-labeled
radiocyanide. Today, the rate of cyanide exchange is acces-
sible by kinetic NMR methods and by preliminary results
of the exchange on Pt(II) and Pd(II) for pH ) 10.3-10.8.8
The rate law was found to be second order, and no cyanide-
independent pathway was observed. Under these conditions,
the cyanide exchange for [Ni(CN)4]2- was found to be too
fast on the NMR time scale to be determined.
NMR Measurements. NMR spectra were recorded with Bruker
DPX-400 and ARX-400 spectrometers. All solutions used for 13C
measurements contained 2% D2O as the internal lock substance
and 13CH3OH as an internal chemical shift reference (49.3 ppm
with respect to TMS). Methanol was also used as reference for B0
homogeneity. The temperature was controlled by a Bruker B-VT
3000 unit and measured by substituting the sample tube for one
containing a platinum Pt-100 resistor (accuracy ) 0.5 K).9 Slow
isotopic-exchange kinetics were followed after mixing two ther-
mostated solutions at the same pH using a fast injection unit10 or
manual injection. The mixing time was less than 0.5 s. The number
of spectra (15-50), the number of scans for each spectrum, and
the supplementary delay between two successive spectra were
adjusted according to the rate of the exchange reaction.
Magnetization transfer measurements were performed using the
“inversion recovery technique” as described in the literature.11 This
technique can be performed when the longitudinal relaxation rate
1/T1 is less than or equal to the exchange rate. The exchange rate
between two sites can be deduced by selectively inverting the signal
of one and by monitoring the intensity of the signals at both sites
as a function of the delay τ between the perturbation and the
acquisition pulses. Selective inversion of the bound or free signal
was achieved using the so-called “1-3-3-1” pulse train.12 The
return of the magnetization to equilibrium is then governed by both
the 1/T1 value of the exchanging species and the exchange rate
between the sites.13
We have extended the 13C NMR study to the cyanide
exchange from pH ) 1-12.5 to determine if HCN or H2O
can act as nucleophiles. Because of the large numerical range
of the rate constants, kinetic studies were monitored by line-
broadening using the Kubo-Sack formalism as well as
magnetization-transfer and isotopic-labeling techniques. Vari-
able pressure experiments were performed to assign the
cyanide exchange mechanism to these metal centers. The
variation of the pH leads to mechanistic diversity involving
pentacoordinated species and protonation of the tetracyano-
complexes.
High-pressure high-resolution NMR spectra were monitored with
a home-built narrow bore probe (5 mm NMR tube).14 Tetra-
chloroethylene (above 298 K) and Fluobrene (below 298 K) were
used as pressurization liquids. By pumping a thermostated liquid
(synthetic oil above 298 K and ethanol below 298 K) through the
high-pressure vessel, the temperature was stabilized to ( 0.2 K.
The experiments were performed between 273.1 and 353.1 K.
Programs. Line widths of NMR signals were obtained by fitting
Lorentzian functions to the experimental spectra using the NM-
RICMA 2.7 program15for Matlab.16 The adjustable parameters are
the resonance frequency, intensity, line width, baseline, and phasing.
Complete line-shape analysis based on the Kubo-Sack formalism
using modified Bloch equations was also performed with NM-
RICMA 2.7 to extract rate constants from experimental spectra. Data
analysis was carried out with the nonlinear least-squares fitting
program Scientist.17 The reported errors correspond to 1σ.
Experimental Section
Materials and Solutions. K2[Pt(CN)4]‚3H2O, K2[Pd(CN)4]‚
3H2O, and K2[Ni(CN)4]‚H2O (Aldrich) and K13CN (Cambridge
isotope laboratory, 99% enriched) were of the highest quality
available (p.a.) and were used without further purification. Aqueous
solutions of about 0.1 mol kg-1 of each complex with variable
concentrations of KCN were freshly prepared before each experi-
ment. The ionic strength of each solution was fixed to 0.65 ( 0.10
mol kg-1 by adding KNO3 or KCF3SO3. The pH was adjusted by
adding concentrated HNO3 or CF3SO3H and KOH.
pH Measurements. pH values were determined by the poten-
tiometric technique using a titroprocessor (Titrino 716 from
Metrohm) for the addition of titrant and for mV readings. A
combined glass/reference electrode with a symmetrical electrode
chain (Radiometer Analytical S. A., pHC2406L) and a Metrohm
713 pH meter were calibrated from titrations of HCl with NaOH
Results
Cyanide Exchange on [M(CN)4]2- as a Function of pH.
Cyanide exchange on Pt(II), Pd(II), and Ni(II) was studied
(3) (a) Roodt, A.; Leipoldt, J. G.; Helm, L.; Merbach, A. E. Inorg. Chem.
1992, 31, 2864. (b) Roodt, A.; Leipoldt, J. G.; Helm, L.; Merbach, A.
E. Inorg. Chem. 1994, 33, 140. (c) Roodt, A.; Leipoldt, J. G.; Helm,
L.; Abou-Hamdan, A.; Merbach, A. E. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34, 560.
(d) Abou-Hamdan, A.; Roodt, A.; Merbach, A. E. Inorg. Chem. 1998,
37, 1278. (e) Roodt, A.; Abou-Hamdan, A.; Engelbrecht, H. P.;
Merbach, A. E. AdV. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 49, 59.
(9) Ammann, C.; Meier, P.; Merbach, A. E. J. Magn. Reson. 1982, 46,
319.
(10) Bernhard, P.; Helm, L.; Ludi, A.; Merbach, A. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1985, 107, 312.
(11) (a) Dahlquist, F. W.; Longmuir, K. J.; Du Vernet, R. B. J. Magn.
Reson. 1975, 17, 406. (b) Alger, J. R.; Prestegord, J. H. J. Magn.
Reson. 1977, 27, 137. (c) Led, J. J.; Gesmar, H. J. Magn. Reson. 1982,
49, 444.
(4) Sharpe, A. G. The Chemistry of Cyano Complexes of the Transition
Metals; Academic Press: New York, 1976.
(5) (a) Lincoln, S. F.; Merbach, A. E. AdV. Inorg. Chem.; Sykes, A. G.;
Academic Press: 1995, 1; (b) Tobe, M. L.; Burgess, J. Inorganic
Reaction Mechanisms; Longman Group: Harlow, U.K., 1999. (c)
Basolo, F.; Pearson, R. G. Mechanism of Inorganic Reactions, 2nd
ed; Wiley & Sons: New York, 1965. (d) Cross, R. J. AdV. Inorg.
Chem. 1989, 34, 219.
(6) Adamson, A. W.; Welker, J. P.; Volpe, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1950,
73, 4030.
(7) Long, F. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 78, 537.
(12) Hore, P. J. J. Magn. Reson. 1983, 55, 283.
(13) (a) Led, J. J.; Gesmar, H. J. J. Magn. Reson. 1982, 49, 444. (b) Mann,
B. E Annu. Rep. NMR Spectrosc. 1982, 12, 263.
(14) (a) Cusaneli, A.; Nicula-dadci, L.; Frey, U.; Merbach, A. E. Inorg.
Chem. 1997, 36, 2211. (b) Frey, U.; Helm, L.; Merbach, A. E.; Roulet,
R. AdVanced Applications of NMR to Organometallic Chemistry;
Wiley & Sons: New York, 1996.
(15) Helm, L.; Borel, A. NMRICMA 2.7; University of Lausanne: 2000.
(16) Matlab, version 5.3.1; Mathworks Inc.: 1999.
(17) Scientist, version 2.0; Micromath, Inc.: Salt Lake City, UT, 1995.
(8) Pesek, J. J.; Mason, W. R. Inorg. Chem. 1983, 22, 2958.
1718 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 41, No. 7, 2002