interfacial layer and in the H2O phase. In the H2O-CO2 system,
the rate of AN formation is controlled by the conversion of NB
into PHA. Interfacial H2O and NB molecules form hydrogen
bonding, OH ◊ ◊ ◊ ONO,11 which may weaken the N–O bond of
NB. Previously, a striking rate increase was observed in some
reactions on water and this was ascribed to the hydrogen bonds
between interfacial water molecules and reactants or transition
state.12 In addition, da Rocha et al. studied the molecular
structure of the H2O–compressed CO2 interface and observed
excess accumulation of the fluids on both sides of the interface.13
The local density enhancements can have a large impact on the
chemical reactions.14
After the reaction, the H2O phase was easily separated from
the organic product phase. This H2O phase containing 0.35 mol
dm-3 AN was further used for the second reaction, giving the
same results as that using pure H2O. Hence, the H2O phase can
be recyclable without any post-purification, which is of practical
significance.
o-CNB similar to NB but the conversion increased with CO2
pressure through to 13 MPa. The positive effect of H2O was
also observed in the hydrogenation of m- and p-CNB over 16
wt% Ni/TiO2. In Fig. 3b the yield of CAN is plotted against the
total conversion of o-, m-, and p-CNB substrates (the change
of conversion and selectivity with reaction time is shown in ESI
Fig. S3†). For all the isomers, no dehalogenation and coupling
occurred and so the selectivity to CAN was almost 100% at any
conversion, confirming the effectiveness of the present reaction
system including H2O and low-pressure CO2 for the selective
hydrogenation of aromatic nitro compounds to anilines.
In conclusion, the interactions of CO2 and H2O with the
reacting species, the in situ formed acidity, and the better
dispersion of Ni catalyst in the H2O phase are responsible for
the fast and selective hydrogenation of NB in the H2O–CO2
system, in which the conversion of NB into PHA may be the
rate-determining step.
Furthermore, the potential of the H2O–CO2 medium was
examined for the hydrogenation of CNB at 35 ◦C, which is
less soluble in H2O than NB. A 9 wt% or 16 wt% Ni/TiO2
catalyst was used since the selectivity to chloroaniline (CAN)
was slightly better than that obtained with the Ni/Al2O3 (Table
S1 in ESI†). Fig. 3a shows the conversion of o-CNB over 9
wt% Ni/TiO2 as a function of CO2 pressure for the reaction
mixtures in the presence and absence of H2O. One can see
again that the H2O significantly promoted the hydrogenation of
Acknowledgements
We thank the financial support from the One Hundred Talent
Program of CAS, NSFC 20873139, KJCX2, YW.H16, Japan
Society for the Promotion of Science with Grant-in-Aid for Sci-
entific Research (B) 18360378, and the CAS-JSPS international
joint project GJHZ05.
Notes
1 A. S. Travis, in The Chemistry of Anilines, ed. Z. Rappoport, John
Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, England, 2007, pp. 715-782.
2 (a) F. Haber, Z. Elektrochem., 1898, 22, 506; (b) H. U. Blaser, Science,
2006, 313, 312–313; (c) A. Corma, P. Concepcion and P. Serna,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 7266–7269.
3 (a) X. Meng, H. Cheng, Y. Akiyama, Y. Hao, W. Qiao, Y. Yu, F.
Zhao, S. Fujita and M. Arai, J. Catal., 2009, 264, 1–10; (b) X. Meng,
H. Cheng, S. Fujita, Y. Hao, Y. Shang, Y. Yu, S. Cai, F. Zhao and M.
Arai, J. Catal., 2010, 269, 131–139.
4 (a) G. A. Yeo and T. A. Ford, J. Mol. Struct.: Theochem, 1991, 235,
123–136; (b) P. Politzer, J. S. Murray and M. C. Concha, J. Phys. Org.
Chem., 2008, 21, 155–162.
5 (a) S. Nishimura, Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalytic Hydrogena-
tion for Organic Synthesis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2001, pp.
334–336; (b) J. Ning, J. Xu, J. Liu, H. Miao, H. Ma, C. Chen, X. Li, L.
Zhou and W. Yu, Catal. Commun., 2007, 8, 1763–1766; (c) P. Maity,
S. Basu, S. Bhaduri and G. K. Lahiri, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2007, 349,
1955–1962.
6 M. Burgener, D. Ferri, J.-D. Grunwaldt, T. Mallat and A. Baiker, J.
Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109, 16794–16800.
7 L. W. Diamond and N. N. Akinfiev, Fluid Phase Equilib., 2003, 208,
265–290.
8 (a) K. L. Toews, R. M. Shroll, C. M. Wai and N. G. Smart, Anal.
Chem., 1995, 67, 4040–4043; (b) C. Roosen, M. Ansorge-Schumacher,
T. Mang, W. Leitner and L. Greiner, Green Chem., 2007, 9, 455–458.
9 (a) C. J. Stalder, S. Chao, D. P. Summers and M. S. Wrighton, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1983, 105, 6318–6320; (b) J. Elek, L. Na´dasdi, G. Papp,
G. Laurenczy and F. Joo´, Appl. Catal., A, 2003, 255, 59–67.
10 O. Kamm and C. S. Marvel, Org. Synth., 1925, 4, 57–59.
11 M. Jorge, M. Nata´lia and D. S. Cordeiro, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2007,
111, 17612–17626.
Fig. 3 (a) Influence of CO2 pressure on the conversion of o-CNB over 9
wt% Ni/TiO2 after 50 min of hydrogenation in the systems of H2O–CO2
and compressed CO2 alone; (b) CAN yield against CNB conversion
during the hydrogenation of CNB isomers in the H2O–CO2 (6 MPa)
system. (CNB 9.52 mmol, Ni/TiO2 0.15 g, H2 4 MPa, 35 ◦C).
12 Y. S. Jung and R. A. Marcus, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 5492–
5502.
13 S. R. P. da Rocha, K. P. Johnston, R. E. Westacott and P. J. Rossky,
J. Phys. Chem. B, 2001, 105, 12092–12104.
14 I. Benjamin, Acc. Chem. Res., 1995, 28, 233–239.
572 | Green Chem., 2011, 13, 570–572
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
©