A R T I C L E S
Boiocchi et al.
Table 1. Crystal Data for the Complex Salts, [Bu4N][1‚CH3COO]
and [Bu4N][1‚HCO3]‚2H2O
In this context, we were interested in investigating in detail
the nature of the interaction of the urea subunit with anions. In
particular, we chose the derivative 1, 1,3-bis(4-nitrophenyl)-
urea. 4-Nitrophenyl substituents were appended to the urea
moiety for two main reasons. (i) Presence of -NO2 electron-
withdrawing substituents is expected to enhance the acidity and,
as a consequence, the H-bond donor properties of the receptor.
(ii) The optical properties of the chromogenic nitrophenyl
fragment may be altered following receptor-anion interaction,
thus providing colorimetric and spectral sensing of the recogni-
tion event. Indeed, it has been shown that even simple
chromophores, containing hydrogen-bonding donor groups, can
operate as efficient colorimetric sensors for the naked-eye
detection of anions.11
[Bu4N][1
‚
CH3COO]
[Bu4N][1‚HCO3]‚2H2O
formula
M
C31H49N5O7
603.75
C30H51N5O10
641.76
color
deep yellow
0.70 × 0.50 × 0.35
monoclinic
P21/c (no. 14)
10.0827(17)
20.4341(23)
17.2817(48)
106.067(22)
3421.5(12)
4
1.172
0.083
ω - 2θ scans
2-26
7094
deep yellow
dimension (mm)
crystal system
space group
a [Å]
b [Å]
c [Å]
0.70 × 0.50 × 0.35
monoclinic
P21/c (no. 14)
9.6592(25)
18.2763(14)
19.8024(27)
91.517(10)
3494.4(12)
4
1.220
0.092
ω - 2θ scans
2-26
14221
â [deg]
V [Å3]
Z
F
calcd [g cm-3
]
µ Mo KR [mm-1
scan type
]
Experimental Section
θ range [deg]
measured reflns
unique reflns
General Procedures and Materials. All reagents for the syntheses
were purchased by Aldrich/Fluka and used without further purification.
UV-vis spectra were recorded on a Varian CARY 100 spectropho-
tometer, with a quartz cuvette (path length ) 1 cm), and on a Hewlett-
Packard 8452A spectrophotometer, with a quartz cuvette (path length
) 10 cm). The cell holder was thermostated at 25.0 °C, through
circulating water. 1H NMR spectra were obtained on a Bruker
AVANCE 400 spectrometer (400 MHz), operating at 9.37 T. Spec-
trophotometric titrations were performed on 2-5 × 10-5 and 1.0 ×
10-6 M solutions of 1 and in MeCN (polarographic grade). Typically,
6700
0.0331
6859
0.0735
a
Rint
strong data [IO > 2σ(IO)]
R1, wR2 (strong data)b
R1, wR2 (all data)b
GOFc
2198
2429
0.0757, 0.1254
0.2425, 0.1794
0.980
0.0600, 0.1102
0.1995, 0.1524
0.946
refined parameters
395
0.15/-0.14
431
0.19/-0.15
max/min residuals [e Å-3
]
2
2
a Rint ) ∑|Fo2 - Fo (mean)|/∑ Fo . b R1 ) ∑ ||Fo| - |Fc||/∑ |Fo|, wR2
) [∑ [w(Fo - Fc )2]/[∑w(Fo )2]]1/2, where w ) 1/[σ2Fo + (aP)2 + bP]
2
2
2
2
and P ) [(max (Fo ,0) + 2Fc ]/3. c GOF ) {∑[w(Fo2 - Fc )2]/(n - p)}1/2
,
2
2
2
aliquots of a fresh alkylammonium salt standard solution of the
where n is the number of reflections and p the total number of refined
envisaged anion (CH3COO-, C6H5COO-, H2PO4-, NO2-, HSO4
,
-
parameters.
NO3-, F-, or Cl-) were added, and the UV-vis spectra of the samples
were recorded. All spectrophotometric titration curves were fitted with
the HYPERQUAD program.12 Care was taken that in each titration,
the p parameter (p ) [concentration of complex]/[maximum possible
concentration of complex]) was lower than 0.8, a condition required
for the safe determination of a reliable equilibrium constant.13 1H NMR
titrations were carried out on DMSO-d6 solution, at a higher concentra-
tion of 1 (5 × 10-3 M).
age.14 Absorption effects were evaluated with the psi-scan method,15
and absorption correction was applied to the data (min/max transmission
factors for the crystals were 0.922/0.968 and 0.910/0.971). Crystal
structures were solved by direct methods (SIR 97)16 and refined by
full-matrix least-squares procedures on F2 using all reflections (SHELXL
97).17 Anisotropic displacement parameters were refined for all non-
hydrogen atoms. Hydrogens bonded to carbon atoms were placed at
calculated positions with the appropriate AFIX instructions and refined
using a riding model; hydrogens bonded to the N(1) and N(3) amines,
as well as those belonging to water molecules and the hydrogencar-
bonate anion, were located in the ∆F map and refined by restraining
the X-H distance to be 0.89 ( 0.02 Å.
Synthesis of 1,3-Bis(4-nitrophenyl)urea (1). 4-Nitrophenylisocy-
anate (0.027 g, 0.163 mmol) was added to a solution of 4-nitroaniline
(0.022 g, 0.163 mmol) in dry dioxane (10 mL), in a round flask filled
with argon. The mixture was heated at 100 °C under magnetic stirring
for 24 h. During the reaction, a yellow precipitate formed, which was
collected by filtration, washed with water, and dried in vacuo. The
yellow solid (0.044 g, 89%) is air stable, soluble in DMSO, partially
soluble in acetonitrile, and insoluble in all other common solvents: 1H
NMR (DMSO-d6) δH 8.22 (d, 2H, Hâ), 7.73 (d, 2H, HR), 9.70 (s, 2H,
Results and Discussion
The interaction of receptor 1 with the Y-shaped anion
CH3COO- was investigated in an MeCN solution through
spectrophotometric titration experiments. In particular, a standard
solution of [Bu4N]CH3COO was added stepwise to a 4 × 10-5
M solution of 1 at 25 °C. Upon acetate addition, the pale yellow
solution of 1 took a bright yellow color, as shown in the picture
in Figure 1.
Figure 2 shows the family of spectra taken in the course of
the titration. Upon addition of CH3COO-, the band at 345 nm
progressively decreases, while a new band at 370 nm forms
and develops. Presence of two sharp isosbestic points at 262
and 354 nm indicates that only two species coexist at the
equilibrium. The profile of the intensities of the bands at 345
NH), coupling constants determined for an AA′MM′ system JHR,Hâ
)
JHâ,HR ) 8 Hz; IR (Nujol, cm-1) ν 1741 (CdO), 1577 ν(N-O), 1461
νas(NO2), 1301 νs(NO2), 3365, 3339 νas,νs(N-H), 1498, 1249 δas,δs-
(N-H).
X-ray Crystallographic Studies. Diffraction data were collected
at room temperature by means of an Enraf-Nonius CAD4 four-circle
diffractometer, working with graphite-monochromatized Mo KR X-
radiation (λ ) 0.71073 Å). Crystal data for the [Bu4N][1‚CH3COO]
and [Bu4N][1‚HCO3]‚2H2O complex salts are reported in Table 1.
Data reductions (including intensity integration, background, Lorentz,
and polarization corrections) were performed with the WinGX pack-
(7) Smith, P. J.; Reddington, M. V.; Wilcox, C. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992,
41, 6085-6088.
(8) Fan, E.; van Arman, S. A.; Kincaid, S.; Hamilton, A. D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1993, 115, 369-370.
(14) Farrugia, L. J. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1999, 32, 837-838.
(15) North, A. C. T.; Phillips, D. C.; Mathews, F. S. Acta Crystallogr. 1968,
A24, 351-359.
(9) Fitzmaurice, R. J.; Kyne, G. M.; Douheret, D.; Kilburn, J. D. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2002, 841-864.
(10) Steiner, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 48-76.
(11) Miyaji, H.; Sessler, J. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 154-157.
(12) Gans, P.; Sabatini, A.; Vacca, A. Talanta 1996, 43, 1739-1753.
(13) Wilcox, C. S. Frontiers in Supramolecular Chemistry and Photochemistry;
VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1991; pp 123-143.
(16) Altomare, A.; Burla, M. C.; Camalli, M.; Cascarano, G. L.; Giacovazzo,
C.; Guagliardi, A.; Moliterni, A. G. G.; Polidori, G.; Spagna, R. J. Appl.
Crystallogr. 1999, 32, 115-119.
(17) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELX97: Programs for Crystal Structure Analysis;
University of Go¨ttingen: Go¨ttingen, Germany, 1997.
9
16508 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 50, 2004