2104
RAPHAEL et al., Orient. J. Chem., Vol. 30(4), 2099-2104 (2014)
The second cathodic peak, which arise in the scan rate and the anodic current was
the more negative potential to that of the first proportional to 1/2 (Figure 8). The overall
reduction peak is assignable to the reduction of mechanism can be represented as follows.
Cu(I)-chelate to the Cu(0)-chelate. Since the Epc2
was also moved to the higher negative potentials
with the scan rate, quasi reversible nature of the
CONCLUSIONS
electrode process can be assumed.The peak height
was not proportional to the square root of scan rate.
The stability of Cu(0)–chelate is very low and the
ligand molecules may or may not detach
(decomplexation) from the metal atom within a short
span. So the concentration of Cu(0)-chelate in the
immediate vicinity of the carbon electrode will be
very low.The first anodic peak in CV can be attributed
to the anodic oxidation of Cu(0)-chelate, which is
the counter peak of Epc1. The height of this anodic
peak was high and showed proportionality with 1/
´
´
Novel heterocyclic phenylhydrazone (APPH)
and its copper chelate were synthesized.
Structure of the ligand and chelate were
established by various analytical methods
and it was proved that a 1:1 stoichiometry
exist between the ligand and the metal ion.
Square planar geometry was suggested for
the chelate.
The electrochemical behaviour of the ligand
and chelate were studied using cyclic
voltammetry. One redox couple was shown
by APPH, while the chelate displayed two
redox couples in the voltammogram.
The quasi reversible nature of the redox
process was observed in both APPH and its
Cu(II) chelate
´
´
2
(Figure 7) which may be due to the combined
oxidation of unstable Cu(0)-chelate and free Cu
atoms adjacent to the electrode.The second anodic
peak appeared at high positive potential can be
assigned to the anodic oxidation of Cu(I)-chelate to
Cu(II)-chelate in a quasi reversible manner. This
peak was shifted to more positive potentials with
REFERENCES
Prakash, A.; Singh, B. K.; Bhojak, N.; Adhikari,
1.
2.
Res. Chem. Intermed. 2014, 40, 2689-2701.
Shaju, K. S.; Joby, T. K.;Vinod. P. R.; Oriental.
J. Chem. 2014, 30(2), 807-813 .
D.; Spectrochim. Acta. 2010, 76, 356-362.
12.
Siddiqi, K. S.; Kureshy, R. I.; Khan, N. H.;
Tabassum, S.; Zaidi, S.; Inorg. Chem. Acta. 13.
1988, 151(2), 95-100.
Joshi, K.T.;Pancholi, A.M.;Oriental. J. Chem.
2000, 16, 287-290.
3.
4.
5.
Laidler, D.A.;Miller, D.J.;J. Organomet. Chem. 14.
1984, 270, 121-129.
Zhu, L.;Li, Chenn, H.; Song, F.;Zhu, X.;Hua. 15.
Shif. Dax. Xue. Zirank. 2003, 37, 499-502.
Dash, B.;Mahapatra, P.K.;Panda, D.;Patnaik, 16.
J. M.; J. Indian Chem. Soc. 1984, 61, 1061-
Singh K.; Barwa, M. S.; Eur. J. Med. Chem.
2006, 41, 147-152.
Ruiz, E.; Alemany, P.; Alvarez, S.; Cano, J.;
Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36(17), 3683-3688.
Biradar, N. S.; Havinale, B. R.; Inorg. Chim.
Acta 1976, 17, 157-160.
1064.
17.
Coles, R. B.; Harris, C. M.; Sinn, E.; Inorg.
Chem. 1969, 8 (12), 2607-2612.
Mendes, I. C.; Moreira, J. P.; Mangrich, A. S.;
Balena, S. P.; Rodrigues, B. L.; Beraldo, H.;
Polyhedron, 2007, 26, 3263-3270.
6.
Rao, N. R.; Rao, P.V.; Reddy, G.V.; Ganorkar,
M. C.; Indian J. Chem.1987, 26A, 887-890.
Mishra, P.; Gupta, P. N.; Shakaya, A. K.; J.
Indian Chem. Soc. 1991, 68, 539-541.
18.
7.
8.
Srinivasa.V.;Srivastava, S.K.;Mishra, A.P.;J. 19.
Indian Chem. Soc. 1995, 72, 47-78.
Dhakrey, R.;Saxena, G.;J. Indian Chem. Soc.
Mendes, I. C.; Moreira, J. P.; Speziali, N. L.;
Mangrich, A. S.;Takahashi, J. A.; Beraldo, H.;
J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2006, 17, 1571-1577.
Recio-Despaigne, A. A.; Da Costa, F. B.; Piro,
O. E.; Castellano, E. E.; Louro, S. R. W.;
Beraldo. H.; Polyhedron, 2012, 38, 285-290.
9.
1987, 64, 685-686.
20.
10.
11.
Rîmbu, C.; Danac, R.; Pui, A.; Chem. Pharm.
Bull. 2014, 62 (1), 5-12.
Vinod, P. R.; Joby, T. K.; Shaju, K. S.; Aby, P.;