A R T I C L E S
Sørensen et al.
3
5–37
desorption properties of metal ammine halides.
The most
Table 2. Indirect Hydrogen Storage Capacity of Four Metal
Ammine Salts
general trend in these original data is that the desorption enthalpy
of ammonia increases from chloride through bromide to iodide.
The data available for fluorides indicate that fluoride does indeed
follow the same trend, but, in fact, only a few metal ammine
a
3
F, g/cm
gravimetric H, wt % H
volumetric H, kg H/L
Mg(NH3)6Cl2
Ca(NH3)8Cl2
Mn(NH3)6Cl2
Ni(NH3)6Cl2
1.25
1.19
1.41
1.53
9.19
9.78
7.96
7.83
0.115
0.116
0.112
0.119
3
5,37–39
fluorides have been investigated in detail.
The effect of
the metal cation is not as clear, but some trends can be seen.
For the alkali and alkaline earth metals, the enthalpy of
a
42
Crystal densities.
3
7,38
desorption decreases down through the groups,
and for the
Table 3. Ammonia Desorption Enthalpies for Each Desorption
transition metals, the enthalpy of desorption increases slightly
when moving from left to right in the Periodic Table, i.e., from
43
Step for Four Different Metal Ammine Complexes
3
7
manganese to nickel in oxidation state 2+.
3 n
Mg(NH ) Cl
2
3 n
Ca(NH ) Cl
2
3 n
Mn(NH ) Cl
2
3 n 2
Ni(NH ) Cl
For a metal ammine complex to be considered useful as an
indirect hydrogen storage material, it needs to desorb ammonia
in a relatively narrow temperature range around or above
ambient temperature. For the storage to be safe, the ammonia
vapor pressure should preferably be below 1 bar at ambient
temperature. Possibly, somewhat higher pressures could be
handled appropriately in practical systems. However, with such
materials, leaks would represent a significant hazard. At the same
time, 1 bar of ammonia pressure should preferably be reached
below 650 K for all desorption steps to avoid desorption of
ammonia becoming too energy intensive. This is so because
the ammonia decomposition reaction is best conducted above
∆Hdes
,
∆Hdes
,
∆Hdes
,
∆Hdes,
kJ/mol
n
kJ/mol
n
kJ/mol
n
kJ/mol
n
6f2
f1
f0
55.7
74.9
87.0
8f4
4f2
2f1
41.0
42.3
63.2
69.1
6f2
2f1
1f0
47.4
71.0
84.2
6f2
2f1
1f0
59.2
79.5
89.8
2
1
1
f0
which the equilibrium vapor pressure is 1 bar for the first
desorption step in the four different complexes are 305
Ca(NH3)8Cl2), 358 (Mn(NH3)6Cl2), 413 (Mg(NH3)6Cl2), and
(
43
4
49 K (Ni(NH3)6Cl2). The theoretical storage capacities of
the metal ammine complexes are given in Table 2, and
desorption enthalpies for the individual desorption steps are
reported separately in Table 3.
6
50 K, where a sufficiently high rate can be achieved and
simultaneously a sufficiently low equilibrium ammonia con-
centration is reached. Moreover, the gravimetric and volumetric
hydrogen density of the chosen metal ammine salt(s) should
clearly be as high as possible. This criterion obviously favors
light cations and anions such as alkali metals and fluorides.
These are, however, impractical because the alkali metals do
not bind ammonia sufficiently well at ambient temperature
according to the above criteria, and the fluorides are usually
toxic and can form hydrofluoric acid when they are heated to
In utilizing the present approach for indirect hydrogen storage
above the gram scale, it is important that the complexes can be
compacted into tablets or other shaped bodies with as little void
space as possible. This was previously reported to be possible
for Mg(NH3)6Cl2, and it was found that, during desorption of
ammonia from tablets of this salt, a sponge-like structure
maintaining the shape of the original tablet was formed featuring
a nanopore system, which facilitates desorption of ammonia
3
9
desorb the ammonia.
44,45
from the interior of the compact material.
So far, the only metal ammine complex which has been
investigated in any detail as an indirect hydrogen storage
The compactability, the ability to form of nanopores, and the
kinetics of ammonia desorption are investigated in this study
for Ca(NH3)8Cl2, Mn(NH3)6Cl2, and Ni(NH3)6Cl2, and the results
are reported in the following sections.
4
0
material is Mg(NH3)6Cl2. Mg(NH3)6Cl2 was chosen initially
because it has a vapor pressure of only 2.2 mbar at 300 K, and
additionally MgCl2 is both widely available and nontoxic.
However, other salts can similarly bind ammonia to form
interesting indirect hydrogen storage materials. For one, CaCl2
binds eight ammonia molecules to form Ca(NH3)8Cl2 at 300 K
and 1 bar of NH3. This gives an even higher indirect hydrogen
storage density than that achieved in Mg(NH3)6Cl2 on both a
mass and volume basis, but it also results in an equilibrium
ammonia pressure of 0.77 bar at 300 K. In Ca(NH3)8Cl2, only
six of the NH3 molecules are coordinated directly to calcium.
Experimental Methods
Commercial anhydrous salts (CaCl
Aldrich, 98%; MnCl , Aldrich, 98%) were transferred to the reaction
vessel in a glovebox containing dry air (6-8 ppm H O) and dried
at 400-500 °C in a stream of N before use. The vessel was purged
with NH gas (Hede Nielsen, N45) and left overnight under a
pressure of NH slightly above 4 bar. NH uptakes were determined
2 2
, Alfa Aesar, 97%; NiCl ,
2
2
2
3
3
3
gravimetrically. Each metal ammine halide was pressed into tablets
to determine the maximal bulk density of the storage material.
Tablets of the material were also subjected to measurements of
pore size distributions. These were performed using nitrogen
absorption and desorption measurements on a Micrometrics ASAP
2020N, with pretreatment of the samples at temperatures and
41
The last two are more freely bound in the crystalline structure.
MnCl2 and NiCl2 coordinate ammonia to form Mn(NH3)6Cl2
and Ni(NH3)6Cl2, respectively. Both of these have higher
molar masses than Mg(NH3)6Cl2, but as their crystal densities
4
2
are also higher, the volumetric hydrogen contents are
essentially the same as in Mg(NH)6Cl2. The temperatures at
3
pressures chosen to give the desired levels of NH desorption.
(
42) Gmelin Data: 2000-2006, Gesellschaft Deutscher Chemiker licensed
(
(
(
(
(
(
35) Ephraim, F. Chem. Ber. 1912, 45, 1322–1331.
to MDL Information Systems GmbH; 1988-1999, Gmelin Institut
f u¨ r Anorganische Chemie und Grenzgebiete der Max-Planck-Gesell-
schaft zur Foerderung der Wissenschaften.
36) Biltz, W.; H u¨ ttig, G. F. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1919, 109, 88–110.
37) Biltz, W. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1923, 130, 93–139.
38) Biltz, W.; Hansen, W. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1923, 127, 1–33.
39) Patil, K. C.; Secco, E. A. Can. J. Chem. 1972, 50, 567–573.
40) Christensen, C. H.; Sørensen, R. Z.; Johannessen, T.; Quaade, U.;
Honkala, K.; Elmøe, T. D.; Køhler, R.; Nørskov, J. K. J. Mater. Chem.
(43) Lepinasse, E.; Spinner, B. ReV. Int. Froid. 1994, 17, 309–321.
(44) Hummelshøj, J. S.; Sørensen, R. Z.; Kustova, M. Y.; Johannesen, T.;
Nørskov, J. K.; Christensen, C. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 16–
17.
2
005, 15, 4106–4108.
(45) Jacobsen, H. S.; Hansen, H. A.; Andreasen, J. W.; Shi, Q.; Andreasen,
A.; Feidenhans’l, R.; Nielsen, M. M.; Ståhl, K.; Vegge, T. Chem. Phys.
Lett. 2007, 441, 255–260.
(
41) Westman, S.; Werner, P.-E.; Schuler, T.; Raldow, W. Acta Chem.
Scand. 1981, 35, 467–472.
8
662 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 9 VOL. 130, NO. 27, 2008