Chemistry - A European Journal
10.1002/chem.201803062
FULL PAPER
0
.85 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H), 0.68 – 0.58 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl
δ 158.3, 153.4, 151.4, 148.2, 140.2, 140.0, 136.5, 128.3, 127.2, 126.3,
3
)
– 0.45 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d
/CDCl (1:1)) δ 176.5,
6 3
170.8, 170.2, 156.1, 151.8, 150.5, 149.1, 143.6, 140.2, 139.2, 138.5,
135.2, 132.0, 131.3, 129.9, 129.5, 128.3, 127.5, 126.7, 125.0, 124.0,
123.1, 120.5, 119.1, 114.7, 110.3, 98.9, 94.5, 93.7, 79.2, 56.0, 37.5, 36.1,
31.8, 29.7, 29.5, 29.4, 29.2, 29.1, 23.8, 22.6, 14.3. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M]+
1
2
23.3, 122.2, 121.5, 120.5, 117.0, 55.2, 41.4, 32.0, 30.2, 29.8, 29.7, 29.7,
9.4, 29.4, 25.5, 24.1, 22.8, 14.3. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+H]+ Calcd for
41
C H62N 568.4882, found 568.4877.
72 2 4
Calcd for C58H N O 860.5492, found 860.5474.
1
0,10-Didodecyl-1,2-dimethyl-10H-indeno[1,2-g]quinolin-1-ium
iodide (5). The compound 4 (0.68 g, 1.2 mmol), MeI (0.85g, 6 mmol) and
mL acetonitrile were taken in a sealed tube and heated at 100 ºC for 48
2
Acknowledgments
h. After the completion of the reaction the solvents were removed to give
compound 5 as yellow gum which was used without further purification
0.767 g, 90%). 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl
This work is financially supported by the Council of Scientific and
Industrial Research (CSIR) Network Project NWP0054 (CSIR-
TAPSUN), and SERB-EMR/2016/007114, India. R.B. thanks
CSIR, New Delhi for research fellowships. J.N. thanks Dr.
Kothandam Krishnamoorthy, Polymer Science Engineering
Division, CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, India, for
his support, help with device fabrication and characterization.
Authors also thank Mr. Ananthan Alagumalai for help with
making a precursor.
(
8
3
) δ 8.87 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H),
.39 (s, 1H), 8.22 (s, 1H), 8.01 – 7.87 (m, 2H), 7.52 – 7.40 (m, 3H), 4.77
(
s, 3H), 3.33 (s, 3H), 2.25 – 2.07 (m, 4H), 1.22 – 1.02 (m, 35H), 0.85 (t, J
=
1
1
2
6.4 Hz, 6H), 0.63 – 0.44 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl
3
) δ 161.7,
59.0, 151.3, 145.4, 143.9, 140.1, 137.4, 130.6, 128.8, 128.1, 124.8,
23.6, 121.8, 119.4, 112.1, 57.0, 54.5, 41.6, 41.1, 32.0, 30.0, 29.71,
+
9.65, 29.4, 24.7, 24.2, 22.8, 14.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M] Calcd for
+
C
42
H
64N 582.5033, found 582.5031.
General procedure for synthesizing ISQ dyes: Indenoquinaldinium
iodide, 5 (1 equiv) and respective semi-squaric acid derivatives P1, or P2
or P3 (1.2 equiv) were dissolved in 10 mL of n-BuOH/PhMe (1:1) in a
two-necked round bottom flask and fitted with Dean-Stark apparatus.
Quinoline (1 mL) was added to the reaction mixture and refluxed for 24 h
under argon atmosphere. The reaction mixture was cooled to room
temperature, and the solvents were removed under reduced pressure.
Keywords: unsymmetrical squaraine dyes, Indenoquinaldine,
H- and J-type aggregation, dye-sensitized solar cells, NIR active
dyes, CDCA
2 2
The residue was purified by column chromatography (MeOH-CH Cl ) to
afford the desired dye as dark green solid.
[
1]
a) A. Hagfeldt, G. Boschloo, L. Sun, L. Kloo, H. Pettersson, Chem.
Rev. 2010, 110, 6595–6663; b) M. Grätzel, J. Photochem. Photobiol.
C Photochem. Rev. 2003, 4, 145–153.
ISQ1: Started with 5 (0.2 g, 0.28 mmol) and P1 (0.105 g, 0.34 mmol).
[2]
a) B. E. Hardin, H. J. Snaith, M. D. McGehee, Nat. Photonics 2012, 6,
162–169; b) J. Wu, Z. Lan, J. Lin, M. Huang, Y. Huang, L. Fan, G. Luo,
Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 2136–2173; c) S. Thomas, T. G. Deepak, G. S.
Anjusree, T. A. Arun, S. V. Nair, A. S. Nair, J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2,
o
1
Yield: 0.165 g, 67 %. m.p. 200-202 C. H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl
3
) δ 9.57
(d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H), 8.09 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.03 (s, 1H), 7.98 – 7.87 (m,
2
8
1
0
1
1
1
2
H), 7.85 – 7.72 (m, 1H), 7.54 (s, 1H), 7.44 – 7.34 (m, 3H), 6.87 (d, J =
.4 Hz, 1H), 6.30 (s, 1H), 5.84 (s, 1H), 4.13 (s, 3H), 3.44 (s, 3H), 2.15 –
.96 (m, 4H), 1.83 (s, 6H), 1.24 – 1.02 (m, 36H), 0.84 (t, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H),
4474–4490; d) M.-E. Yeoh, K.-Y. Chan, Int. J. Energy Res. 2017, 41,
2446–2467; e) J. Gong, K. Sumathy, Q. Qiao, Z. Zhou, Renew.
Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 68, 234–246; f) M. Freitag, J. Teuscher, Y.
Saygili, X. Zhang, F. Giordano, P. Liska, J. Hua, S. M. Zakeeruddin,
J.-E. Moser, M. Grätzel, A. Hagfeldt, Nat. Photonics 2017, 11, 372–
.65 – 0.49 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl
3
) δ 184.7, 181.8, 180.8,
70.5, 168.1, 165.4, 156.9, 153.7, 150.6, 148.1, 141.6, 139.8, 138.9,
36.8, 131.3, 128.8, 127.6, 125.7, 125.6, 124.0, 123.3, 123.2, 120.7,
19.2, 109.7, 107.3, 96.0, 87.8, 56.2, 47.5, 41.1, 37.8, 32.00, 30.4, 30.1,
378; g) P. Pinpithak, A. Kulkarni, H.-W. Chen, M. Ikegami, T.
Miyasaka, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2018, 91, 754–760; h) H.
Shimogawa, M. Endo, T. Taniguchi, Y. Nakaike, M. Kawaraya, H.
Segawa, Y. Murata, A. Wakamiya, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2017, 90,
+
9.7, 29.6 29.4, 29.4, 27.6, 24.0, 22.8, 14.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M] Calcd
441–450.
4
for C59H76N2O 876.5805, found 876.5793.
[3]
a) B. O’Regan, M. Grätzel, Nature 1991, 353, 737–740; b) A. S. Polo,
M. K. Itokazu, N. Y. Murakami Iha, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2004, 248,
1
343–1361; c) C.-Y. Chen, M. Wang, J.-Y. Li, N. Pootrakulchote, L.
ISQ2: Started with 5 (0.2 g, 0.28 mmol) and P2 (0.101 g, 0.34 mmol).
Alibabaei, C. Ngoc-le, J.-D. Decoppet, J.-H. Tsai, C. Grätzel, C.-G.
Wu, S. M. Zakeeruddin, M. Grätzel, ACS Nano 2009, 3, 3103–3109.
a) L.-L. Li, E. W.-G. Diau, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 42, 291–304; b) S.
Mathew, A. Yella, P. Gao, R. Humphry-Baker, B. F. E. Curchod, N.
Ashari-Astani, I. Tavernelli, U. Rothlisberger, M. K. Nazeeruddin, M.
Grätzel, Nat. Chem. 2014, 6, 242–247; c) M. Urbani, M. Grätzel, M. K.
Nazeeruddin, T. Torres, Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 12330–12396; d) T.
Higashino, H. Imahori, Dalton Trans. 2014, 44, 448–463.
o
1
Yield: 0.121 g, 50 %. m.p.180-182 C. H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl
3
) δ 9.54
(d, J = 9.1 Hz, 1H), 8.70 (s, 1H), 8.19 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 2H), 7.93 (d, J =
[4]
8
1
.0 Hz, 1H), 7.87 (d, J = 12.9 Hz, 2H), 7.77 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (s,
H), 7.38 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 3H), 7.27 (s, 1H), 6.25 (s, 1H), 5.89 (s, 1H), 4.08
(s, 3H), 3.55 (s, 3H), 2.10 (s, 6H), 2.06 – 1.97 (m, 4H), 1.23 – 1.11 (m,
2
4H), 1.06 – 1.01 (m, 12H), 0.84 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 6H), 0.64 – 0.55 (m, 4H).
) δ 184.9, 181.9, 179.0, 168.8, 168.1, 156.6,
53.2, 150.6, 139.9, 139.4, 139.0, 136.1, 133.7, 133.1, 131.4, 131.2,
1
3C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl
3
[5]
[6]
a) A. Mishra, M. K. R. Fischer, P. Bäuerle, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2009, 48, 2474–2499; b) M. Liang, J. Chen, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013,
42, 3453–3488; c) Z.-S. Huang, H. Meier, D. Cao, J. Mater. Chem. C
2016, 4, 2404–2426.
1
1
1
2
29.7, 128.6, 127.6, 127.0, 125.7, 125.4, 124.9, 123.2, 122.4, 120.6,
19.1, 110.5, 109.5, 95.4, 86.8, 56.1, 49.9, 41.1, 37.6, 32.0, 30.5, 30.1,
9.7, 29.7, 29.4, 29.4, 27.1, 24.0, 22.8, 14.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M]+
a) M. Liang, J. Chen, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 3453–3488; b) A.
Mahmood, Sol. Energy 2016, 123, 127–144; c) Y. Wu, W.-H. Zhu, S.
M. Zakeeruddin, M. Grätzel, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7,
78 2 4
Calcd for C63H N O 926.5962, found 926.5956.
9307–9318; d) Y. Wu, W. Zhu, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 2039–2058.
[7]
a) W. Zeng, Y. Cao, Y. Bai, Y. Wang, Y. Shi, M. Zhang, F. Wang, C.
Pan, P. Wang, Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 1915–1925; b) N. Zhou, K.
Prabakaran, B. Lee, S. H. Chang, B. Harutyunyan, P. Guo, M. R.
Butler, A. Timalsina, M. J. Bedzyk, M. A. Ratner, S. Vegiraju, S. Yau,
C.-G. Wu, R. P. H. Chang, A. Facchetti, M.-C. Chen, T. J. Marks, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4414–4423; c) Y. Ezhumalai, B. Lee, M.-
S. Fan, B. Harutyunyan, K. Prabakaran, C.-P. Lee, S. H. Chang, J.-S.
Ni, S. Vegiraju, P. Priyanka, Y.-W. Wu, C.-W. Liu, S. Yau, J. T. Lin, C.-
ISQ3: Started with 5 (0.2 g, 0.28 mmol) and P3 (0.124 g, 0.34 mmol).
Yield: 0.16 g, 60%. m.p. 142-144 oC. 1H NMR (400 MHz, [D
]DMSO
(1:1)) δ 9.29 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H), 9.05 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 8.01 (s,
H), 7.97 (s, 2H), 7.82 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (d, J = 4.5 Hz, 1H), 7.69
6
/
CDCl
3
1
(s, 1H), 7.41 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 1H), 7.37 – 7.33 (m, 2H), 7.32 – 7.29 (m, 2H),
5
1
.84 (s, 1H), 5.57 (s, 1H), 3.97 (s, 3H), 3.64 (s, 3H), 2.08 – 1.96 (m, 4H),
.17 – 1.05 (m, 24H), 1.00 – 0.95 (m, 12H), 0.79 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 6H), 0.52
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.