Journal of Natural Products
Article
cells were analyzed for each sample. The viability of cells after
treatment with doxorubicin alone was compared with the viability after
treatment with doxorubicin in combination with the test compounds
or verapamil (positive control).
AUTHOR INFORMATION
■
Corresponding Author
*Tel: +420549496985. Fax: 549491327. E-mail: ipokorna@
WST Assay. Antiproliferative activity was assessed using a WST
assay on 96-well plates (Nunc A/S, Rockilde, Denmark). The assay is
based on the reduction of WST-1 (2-(4-iodophenyl)-3-(4-nitro-
phenyl)-5-(2,4-disulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, Na salt) by viable
cells. The amount of the formazan dye generated by the activity of
dehydrogenases within cells is therefore directly proportional to the
number of living cells. All cells were seeded at a density of 5 × 104 cells
per mL (100 μL/per well) and incubated at 37 °C in a medium
containing doxorubicin, modulators (test compounds or verapamil), or
doxorubicin with modulators for 48 h. After incubation 10 μL of
working WST-1 solution [1 mM WST (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany)]
and 0.2 mM MMPM [(1-methoxy-5-methylphenazinium methyl
sulfate; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA, USA)]
were added to 100 μL of fresh medium in each well, and cells were
incubated for a further 4 h under normal cell culture conditions. At the
end of the incubation periods the optical density was read at 450 nm
using a DTX 880 multimode detector (Beckman Coulter, Inc.). Each
concentration of each of the test compounds was examined in four
replicate wells. The experiment was repeated at least three times.
Cell Cycle Analysis. Approximately 5 × 105 cells/mL (HL60/
MDR) were treated with doxorubicin at a concentration of 0.2 μM
and/or 0.02 μM either alone or in combination with 1 and/or (+)-2 at
a concentration of 25 μM and cultivated under standard conditions for
48 h. Cells were harvested into ice-cold PBS and fixed with 70%
ethanol for 30 min at room temperature. After washing in PBS, the
cells were incubated with RNase A (17 μg/mL) at 37 °C for 30 min
and then stained with PI (3 μg/mL) for 10 min (in darkness, at room
temperature).
Present Address
∥Public Health Institute Ostrava, Partyzan
́
ske
́
Nam
́
es
̌
ti 7, 702
́
00 Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Author Contributions
▽J. Slanina and G. Pac
́ ́
hnikova contributed equally to this
work.
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
The authors thank Prof. B. Sarkadi (Semmelweis University
Medicine, National Blood Centre, Membrane Ressearch Group,
Hungarian Academy of Science, Budapest, Hungary) for
providing HL60/MDR cells and Mrs. Z. Prokopova
́
and I.
́
Komarkova for laboratory assistance. O. Julinek, Institute of
́
́
Chemical Technology, Prague, Czech Republic, is acknowl-
edged for optical rotation measurements. This work was
supported by Masaryk University Projects of Specific Research
MUNI/A/0938/2013 and MUNI/A/0954/2013.
REFERENCES
■
(1) Filipits, M. Drug Discovery Today 2004, 1, 229−234.
(2) Yu, X. Q.; Xue, C. C.; Wang, G.; Zhou, S. F. Curr. Drug Metab.
2007, 8, 787−802.
The cell cycle profile was analyzed using a Cytomics FC 500 flow
cytometer using the FL3 channel (emission at 620 nm), and 10 000−
20 000 events were acquired. Data from each sample were saved as
separate flow cytometry standard (FCS) files using CXP analysis
software (Beckman Coulter, Inc.) and were analyzed for cell cycle
phases using Multicycle AV for Windows software (Phoenix Flow
System, San Diego, CA, USA). DNA content analysis included the
determination of the percentage of G1, G2/M, and S phases and sub-
G1 fractions.
(3) Ozben, T. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 2903−2909.
(4) Wu, C. P.; Ohnuma, S.; Ambudkar, S. V. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol.
2011, 12, 609−620.
(5) Li, L.; Lu, Q. H.; Shen, Y. W.; Hu, X. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2006,
71, 584−595.
(6) Li, L.; Pan, Q. R.; Sun, M.; Lu, Q. H.; Hu, X. Life Sci. 2007, 80,
741−748.
(7) Sun, M.; Xu, X. L.; Lu, Q. H.; Pan, Q. R.; Hu, X. Cancer Lett.
2007, 246, 300−307.
Statistical Analysis. All statistical analysis was performed with
Statistica version 10 (StatSoft software). The data for doxorubicin
accumulation were from at least four independent experiments
performed in triplicate. Statistical comparison of doxorubicin
accumulation induced by the test compound versus the control
group and the verapamil group was done using one-way analysis of
variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s test. Stepwise multiple
regression analysis was used to find the relation between the
percentage of P-gp inhibition and the descriptors in a QSAR model.
The least-squares regression analysis was used to determine the
correlation between the measured data and calculated percentage of
doxorubicin accumulation. A paired Student’s t test was applied to
compare the effects of enantiomers or pairs of test lignans differing
only in one structural parameter.
(8) Wan, C. K.; Zhu, G. Y.; Shen, X. L.; Chattopadhyay, A.; Dey, S.;
Fong, W. F. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2006, 72, 824−837.
(9) Huang, M.; Jin, J.; Sun, H.; Liu, G. T. Cancer Chemother.
Pharmacol. 2008, 62, 1015−1026.
(10) Slanina, J.; Glatz, Z. J. Chromatogr. B 2004, 812, 215−229.
(11) Hancke, J. L.; Burgos, R. A.; Ahumada, F. Fitoterapia 1999, 70,
451−471.
(12) Opletal, L.; Sovova,
357−371.
(13) Pan, Q. R.; Lu, Q. H.; Zhang, K.; Hu, X. Cancer Chemother.
Pharmacol. 2006, 58, 99−106.
́ ́ ́
H.; Bartlova, M. J. Chromatogr. B 2004, 812,
(14) Slaninova,
Vitro 2009, 23, 1047−1054.
́ ̌ ́ ́
I.; Brezinova, L.; Koubíkova, L.; Slanina, J. Toxicol. in
(15) Chiu, P. Y.; Leung, H. Y.; Poon, M. K. T.; Mak, D. H. F.; Ko, K.
M. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2006, 289, 185−191.
Cytotoxicity data were evaluated from at least three independent
experiments performed in triplicate (PI-exclusion assay) or two
independent experiments performed in quadruplicate (WST assay).
The results were analyzed using Student’s t test.
(16) Chiu, P. Y.; Tang, M. H.; Mak, D. H. F.; Poon, M. K. T.; Ko, K.
M. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2003, 35, 368−380.
(17) Ip, S. P.; Ko, K. M. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1996, 52, 1687−1693.
(18) Yoo, H. H.; Lee, M.; Lee, M. W.; Lim, S. Y.; Shin, Y.; Kim, D. H.
Planta Med. 2007, 73, 444−450.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
(19) Schobert, R.; Kern, W.; Milius, W.; Ackermann, T.; Zoldakova,
M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 3359−3362.
■
S
* Supporting Information
(20) Gruber, A.; Peterson, C.; Reiyenstein, P. Int. J. Cancer 1988, 41,
224−226.
The isolation procedure for the lignans investigated and their
characteristic details, including circular dichroism and NMR
spectra, are available free of charge via the Internet at http://
(21) Loetchutinat, C.; Heywang, C.; Priebe, W.; Garnier-Suillerot, A.
Biochem. Pharmacol. 2001, 62, 561−567.
(22) Pajeva, I. K.; Wiese, M. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 5671−5686.
H
dx.doi.org/10.1021/np500521v | J. Nat. Prod. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX