I. D. Tomlinson et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 15 (2005) 5307–5310
5309
NH2
O
S
PEG O
N
H
N
+
O
NH
HN
O
N
O
O
(7)
(9)
O
N
H
(a)
O
S
PEG O
N
H
O
NH
HN
HN
O
N
(8)
N
H
Scheme 2. Reagent and conditions: (a) CH2Cl2, rt, 24 h.
was replaced with borate. Where appropriate the IC50 of
the free ligand was also determined.
activity of the conjugate. These ligands have higher
affinities for hSERT than our first ligand and we ob-
served no quenching when the ligand was bound to
the dot. We hope to be able to use these conjugates in
fluorescent imaging assays in future studies.
Table 1 shows the biological activities of the conjugated
ligands 5 and 8 as well as free ligand 5. IC50 values for
the parent drug (2) and our initial compound (1) in free
solution and conjugated to dots are also shown. When
ligands were conjugated to the streptavidin conjugated
dots, there was no observable decrease in the fluorescent
intensity of the dots. However, when the ligand 1 was at-
tached to quantum dots, there was a significant reduc-
tion in fluorescence that could be observed by the
naked eye. These observations indicated that the thiol
in 1 may be quenching the dots and consequently
ligands with a thiol attached to a linker arm should be
avoided whenever possible. Also, the proximity of the
ligand to quantum dots does not appear to have a detri-
mental effect on the biological activity of the conjugate.
Acknowledgments
We thank Quantum Dot Corporation for supplying the
core shell nanocrystals used in this study. We would also
like to thank Dr. Marcel Bruchez of Quantum Dot Cor-
poration for helpful advice during the course of this
study. This work was supported by grants from the
National Institutes of Health and Quantum Dot
Corporation.
References and notes
In conclusion, we have prepared two biotinylated li-
gands (5 and 8) that may be attached to streptavidin-
conjugated quantum dots. These ligands have high affin-
ity for hSERT when in solution and bound to dots, and
the length of the linker arm between the ligand and the
dot doesnot appear to significantly affect the biological
1. Alivisatos, A. P. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 13226.
2. Hines, M. A.; Guyot-Sionnest, P. J. Phys. Chem. 1996,
100, 468.
3. Dabbousi, B. O.; Rodriguez-Viejo, M. F. V.; Heine, J. R.;
Mattoussi, H.; Ober, R.; Jensen, K. F.; Bawendi, M. G.
J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 9463.
4. Peng, X.; Schlamp, M. C.; Kadavanich, A. V.; Alivisatos,
A. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 7019.
5. Bruchez, M.; Moronne, M.; Gin, P.; Weiss, S.; Alivisatos,
A. P. Science 1998, 281, 2013.
Table 1. IC50 values for free ligands and ligands bound to quantum
dots against the SERT transporter protein
6. Chan, W. C. W.; Nie, S. Science 1998, 281, 2016.
7. Chunyang, Z.; Hui, M.; Nie, S.; Yao, D.; Leland, J.;
Dieyan, C. The Analyst 2000, 125, 1029.
8. Sondi, I.; Silman, O.; Koester, S.; Matijev, E. Langmuir
2000, 16, 3107.
˚
9. Akerman, M. E.; Chan, W. C. W.; Laakkonen, P.; Bhatia,
S. N.; Ruoslahti, E. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 20,
12617.
10. Rosenthal, S. J.; Tomlinson, I. D.; Adkins, E. M.;
Schroeter, S.; Adams, S.; Swafford, L.; McBride, J.;
Compounds Free ligand inhibition Bound ligand inhibition
IC50 (nM)
IC50 (nM)
1
2
5
8
115,000a
99,000a
na
30
80b
2
1c
100
a Values were obtained using HeLa cells.
b Literature value (na = not applicable).
c IC50 value of crude ligand.