8640 J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 108, No. 25, 2004
Wang et al.
resistance would be. When the temperature dropped to ∼8 K,
its resistance was only about 10% of the value recorded at room
temperature (Figure 8B). A sharp change in resistance (5-6
times when compared to the resistance at 8 K) was observed
when the temperature was reduced to 7 K, indicating that the
nanowire had entered a superconducting state. As the temper-
ature was further decreased, the ratio between RT and R8K
continued to decrease, but at a slower rate. In the work by
Michotte et al., a similar result was also obtained for individual
lead nanowires of ∼40 nm in diameter. However, the resistance
never dropped to zero in all our measurements. This observation
might be related to the fact that the resistive heating could slowly
transform the wire surface to a thin layer of lead oxide while
the temperature was still above the transition temperature. It
has been shown in previous studies that the transition temper-
ature sometime decreased as the diameter of nanowires (prepared
on SEM measurements. This material is available free of charge
via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
Acknowledgment. This work has been supported in part
by an AFOSR-DURINT subcontract from SUNY Buffalo, a
Career Award from the National Science Foundation (DMR-
9983893), and a Fellowship from the David and Lucile Packard
Foundation. Y.X. is an Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellow and a
Camille Dreyfus Teacher Scholar. We thank Professor David
Cobden for suggesting the synthetic target described in this
article. Y.W. thanks Drs. Yugang Sun and Brian Mayers for
their help with TEM and HRTEM.
References and Notes
(1) See, for example: (a) a special issue on one-dimensional nano-
structures: AdV. Mater. 2003, 15, 341. (b) A special issue on nanowires:
MRS Bull. 1999, 24, 20. (c) Hu, J.; Odom, T.; Lieber, C. Acc. Chem. Res.
1999, 32, 435.
4
c,13
via electrodeposition against templates) was reduced.
This
(
2) (a) Kovtyukhova, N.; Mallouk, T. Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 4355.
dependence suggests the introduction of disorder into a nanowire
(
b) Murphy, C.; Jana, N. AdV. Mater. 2002, 14, 80. (c) El-Sayed, M. Acc.
1
3
and thus a weakening in the superconducting property. For
all lead nanowires with diameters down to ∼50 nm, we did not
observe any significant difference in their critical transition
temperatures. It was demonstrated that all of them exhibited a
sharp drop in resistance at a critical temperature similar to the
value reported for bulk lead (7.2 K). It is believed that the single
crystalline structure of our nanowires might be the major reason
for the elimination of the size-dependent effect.
Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 257. (d) Song, J.; Wu, Y.; Messer, B.; Kind, H.;
Yang, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10 398. (e) Martin, C.; Mitchell, D.
Electroanal. Chem. 1999, 21, 1.
(3) Kittel, C. Introduction to Solid State Physics; John Wiley & Sons:
New York, 1996.
(4) (a) Dubois, S.; Michel, A.; Eymery, J.; Duvail, J.; Piraux, L. J.
Mater. Res. 1999, 14, 665. (b) Michotte, S.; Piraux, L.; Dubois, S.; Pailloux,
F.; Stenuit, G.; Govaerts, J. Physica C 2002, 377, 267. (c) Yi, G.;
Schwarzacher, W. Appl. Phy. Lett. 1999, 74, 1746. (d) Jalochowski, M.;
Bauer, E. Surf. Sci. 2001, 480, 109. (e) Jalochowski, M.; Bauer, E. Prog.
Surf. Sci. 2001, 67, 79. (f) Pang, Y.; Meng, G.; Zhang, L.; Shan, W.; Gao,
X.; Zhao, A.; Mao, Y. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2002, 14, 11 729. (g)
Pang, Y.; Meng, G.; Zhang, L.; Qin, Y.; Gao, X.; Zhao, A.; Fang, Q. AdV.
Func. Mater. 2002, 12, 719.
Conclusions
We have demonstrated a simple and practical route to the
large-scale production of single crystalline nanowires of lead
as uniform sample and with diameters ranging from 50 to 90
nm. Some of these nanowires could be grown up to several
millimeters in length. The formation of such highly anisotropic
nanostructures in an isotropic medium was believed to involve
a combination of Ostwald ripening (responsible for the transport
of material) and the so-called solution-liquid-solid mechanism
(
5) (a) Sun, Y.; Gates, B.; Mayers, B.; Xia, Y. Nano Lett. 2002, 2,
1
65. (b) Sun, Y.; Yin, Y.; Mayers, B.; Herricks, T.; Xia, Y. Chem. Mater.
2
002, 14, 4736. (c) Sun, Y.; Xia, Y. AdV. Mater. 2002, 14, 833. (d) Sun,
Y.; Mayers, B.; Herricks, T.; Xia, Y. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 955.
(
6) (a) Mohamed, M.; Halawy, S.; Ebrahim, M. Thermochim. Acta
1
994, 236, 249. (b) Leibold, R.; Huber, F. J. Therm. Anal. 1980, 18, 493.
(
c) Mu, J.; Perlmutter, D. Thermochim. Acta 1981, 49, 207.
(7) (a) Trentler, T.; Hickman, K.; Goel, S.; Viano, A.; Gibbons, P.;
Buhro, W. Science 1995, 270, 1791. (b) Trentler, T.; Goel, S.; Hickman,
K.; Viano, A.; Chiang, M.; Beatty, A.; Gibbons, P.; Buhro, W. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 2172. (c) Markowitz, P.; Zach, M.; Gibbons, P.; Penner,
R.; Buhro, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 4502. (d) Holmes, J.; Johnston,
K.; Doty, R.; Korgel, B. Science 2000, 287, 1471.
(to account for the unidirectional growth). The nanowires were
shown to exhibit a transition into the superconducting state at
a critical temperature of 7.13 K, and no significant difference
was observed for nanowires with diameters down to ∼50 nm.
This observation further confirms that the lead nanowires
synthesized using the present method were single crystals, and
there were essentially no defects in each individual wire. It is
believed that this synthetic route could be potentially extended
to several other metals (e.g., Bi and Sn) that are also character-
ized by relatively low melting points. The availability of such
uniform nanowires in high qualities and large quantities will
certainly help us achieve a better understanding on the electron
transport properties of these solid materials at reduced dimen-
sionalities and sizes.
(
8) Roosen, A.; Carter, W. Physica A 1998, 261, 232.
(9) (a) Jin, R.; Cao, Y.; Mirkin, C.; Kelly, K.; Schatz, G.; Zheng, J.
Science 2001, 294, 1901. (b) Sun, Y.; Xia, Y. Science 2002, 298, 2176. (c)
Sun, Y.; Mayers, B.; Xia, Y. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 675. (d) Maillard, M.;
Giorgio, S.; Pileni, M.-P. AdV. Mater. 2002, 14, 1084. (e) Kirkland, A.;
Jefferson, D.; Duff, D.; Edwards, P.; Gameson, I.; Johnson, B.; Smith, D.
Proc. R. Soc. London A 1993, 440, 589. (f) Allpress, J.; Sanders, J. Surf.
Sci. 1967, 7, 1.
(10) Sankarapapavinasam, S.; Ahmed, M. J. Electrochem. Soc. India
1
990, 39, 251.
11) (a) Michotte, S.; Matefi-Tempfli, S.; Piraux, L. Appl. Phys. Lett.
003, 82, 4119. (b) Michotte, S.; Matefi-Tempfli, S.; Piraux, L. Physica C
(
2
2003, 391, 369.
(
(
12) Pan, Z.; Dai, Z.; Wang, Z. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 80, 309.
13) (a) Graybeal, J.; Mankiewich, P.; Dynes, R.; Beasley, M. Phys.
ReV. Lett. 1987, 59, 2697. (b) Sharifi, F.; Herzog, A.; Dynes, R. Phys. ReV.
Lett. 1993, 71, 428. (c) Herzog, A.; Xiong, P.; Sharifi, F.; Dynes, R. Phys.
ReV. Lett. 1996, 76, 668.
Supporting Information Available: Histogram of the
diameter distributions for more than 50 lead nanowires based