192501-3
Navas et al.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 192501 ͑2007͒
an out-of-plane anisotropy component has been recently con-
firmed by Magnetic Force Microscopy imaging.9
In summary, Ni nanohole arrays have been fabricated by
two-step/positive replication process, using AAM templates
with tailored hole diameter. The increase of coercivity in
patterned films denotes the pinning effect of the nanoholes.
The reduction of the in-plane anisotropy with hole diameter
is ascribed to local shape anisotropy effects. Finally, pattern-
ing of Ni hole arrays offers possibilities to control magnetic
anisotropy and coercivity of these films.
The authors thank U. Gösele who facilitated the work at
MPI and J. L. Baldonedo for HRSEM images. The work was
supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education and Culture
under Project No. MAT04-00150 and Integrated Action
Spain-Hungary 2005-7 HH04-0003, and by the German Fed-
eral Ministry of Education and Research under project
BMBF, FKZ 03N8701.
FIG. 5. Coercivity Hc, ͑b͒, reduced remanence ͑MR /Msat͒ ͑᭺͒ and in-plane
anisotropy ͑͒ as a function of hole diameter.
thus opened to control the coercivity by tailoring the hole
diameters and the interhole distances.
1R. P. Cowburn, A. O. Adeyeye, and J. A. C. Bland, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
173, 193 ͑1997͒; Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 2309 ͑1997͒; L. Torres, L.
Lopez-Diaz, and J. Iñiguez, ibid. 73, 3766 ͑1998͒.
Out-of-plane hysteresis loop measurements have been
also performed. The loops show a reduced hysteresis and an
increase of coercivity, susceptibility, and remanence with
nanohole diameter. Figure 5 shows the evolution of coerciv-
ity Hc and the ratio remanence to saturation magnetization
MR/Msat, as a function of hole diameter. Estimation of an
effective in-plane anisotropy Keff is performed through
2A. O. Adeyeye, J. A. C. Bland, and C. Daboo, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 3164
͑1997͒; U. Welp, V. K. Vlasko-Vlasov, G. W. Crabtree, C. Thompson,
V. Metlushko, and B. Llic, ibid. 79, 1315 ͑2001͒; I. Ruiz-Feal, L. Lopez-
Diaz, A. Hirohata, J. Rothman, C. M. Guertler, J. A. C. Bland, L. M.
Garcia, J. M. Torres, J. Bartolome, F. Bartolome, M. Natali, D. Decanini,
and Y. Chen, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 242-245, 597 ͑2002͒; P. Vavassori,
G. Gubbiotti, G. Zangari, C. T. Yu, H. Yin, H. Jiang, and G. J. Mankey, J.
Appl. Phys. 91, 7992 ͑2002͒.
Keff = Kout-of-plane − Kin-plane
3J. C. Hulteen and C. R. Martin, J. Mater. Chem. 7, 1075 ͑1997͒; J. I.
Martin, J. Nogues, K. Liu, J. L. Vicent, and I. K. Schuller, J. Magn. Magn.
Mater. 256, 449 ͑2003͒; J. Liang, H. Chik, and J. Xu, IEEE J. Sel. Top.
Quantum Electron. 8, 998 ͑2002͒; H. Chik and J. M. Xu, Mater. Sci. Eng.,
R. 43, 103 ͑2004͒.
M
M
S
S
=
HdM −
0HdM.
͑1͒
͵ ͵
0
0គout
0_in
4Z. L. Xiao, C. Y. Han, U. Welp, H. H. Wang, V. K. Blasco-Vlasov, W. K.
Kwok, D. J. Miller, J. M. Hiller, R. E. Cook, G. A. Willing, and G. W.
Crabtree, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 2869 ͑2002͒; F. J. Castaño, K. Nielsch,
C. A. Ross, J. W. A. Robinson, and R. Krishnan, ibid. 85, 2872 ͑2004͒.
5R. J. Tonucci, B. L. Justus, A. J. Campillo, and C. E. Ford, Science 258,
783 ͑1992͒; D. J. Pearson and R. J. Tonocci, ibid. 270, 68 ͑1995͒;
M. Park, C. Harrison, P. M. Chaikin, R. A. Register, and D. H. Adamson,
Science 276, 1401 ͑1997͒.
Figure 5 also shows the evolution of Keff with hole di-
ameter. The continuous Ni film exhibits a noticeable in-plane
anisotropy that is mainly ascribed to the shape anisotropy. Its
strength decreases with increasing hole diameter indicating
that the hard axis, which is out-of-plane for the continuous
Ni film, becomes weaker in the patterned samples.6 To ex-
plain that, we consider that the gaps ͑D−d͒ between holes
are of 35 and 70 nm, respectively for the samples with the
largest ͑70 nm͒ and smallest ͑35 nm͒ hole diameters, while
the thickness of the membrane is 200 nm in all cases. A
different “local” shape anisotropy is thus expected, with a
stronger contribution to an out-of-plane anisotropy for the
case of larger hole diameters. The competition between in-
trinsic anisotropy and this local shape anisotropy results in
the reduction of in-plane anisotropy. In fact, the existence of
6H. Masuda and K. Fukuda, Science 268, 1466 ͑1995͒; T. Yanagishita,
K. Nishio, and H. Masuda, Adv. Mater. ͑Weinheim, Ger.͒ 17, 2241
͑2005͒; Y. Lei, W-K. Chim, Z. Zhang, T. Zhou, L. Zhang, G. Meng, and
F. Phillipp, Chem. Phys. Lett. 380, 313 ͑2003͒.
7A. Li, F. Müller, A. Birner, K. Nielsch, and U. Gösele, Adv. Mater. ͑Wein-
heim, Ger.͒ 11, 483 ͑1999͒; K. R. Pirota, D. Navas, M. Hernández-Vélez,
K. Nielsch, and M. Vázquez, J. Alloys Compd. 369, 18 ͑2004͒.
8H. R. Hilzinger and H. Kronmüller, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2, 11 ͑1976͒.
9D. Navas, M. Hernández-Velez, A. Asenjo, M. Jaafar, J. L. Baldonedo,
and M. Vazquez, IEEE Trans. Magn. 42, 3057 ͑2006͒.