6150 J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 102, No. 32, 1998
Letters
a temperature of 180-250 °C. This procedure is likely to
produce activated Pt particles with well-preserved particle
shapes, allowing for efficient catalytic activity. Second, the
particle shape shows almost no change if the specimen tem-
perature is lower than 350 °C. At a temperature between 350
and 450 °C, slight truncation takes place. Therefore, the
resulting Pt particles can still be useful for studying shape-
dependent properties if the reaction temperature is below ∼450
°C. The particle shape experiences a dramatic transformation
into a spherical-like shape when the temperature is higher than
∼500 °C, possibly due to surface diffusion and/or sublimation.
The carbon substrate has a large effect on the mobility of the
nanocrystals on the surface, largely prohibiting the coalescence
of the individual nanocrystals.
The issue of small clusters melting has been discussed
previously in the literature.8-26 Solid-liquid coexistence in
these clusters is discussed using the capillarity approximation
by Reiss, et al.8 and by Buffat and Borel.11 In our study, surface
melting occurs and a surface solid-liquid core coexistence starts
after the particle shape becomes near spherical and is best
observed as the surface of neighboring particles begins to
coalesce (e.g., the large circle in Figure 4) at 500 °C. At 610
°C, more surface melting has taken place as evidenced by the
presence of more atoms found between the particles than at
lower temperatures (500 °C). The core in these particles remains
crystalline as shown in the diffraction patterns at different
temperatures in Figure 5. In this figure, two diffraction patterns
were recorded from the same aggregate of nanocrystals before
and after being annealed in-situ from 25 to 650 °C. The
intensities of the high index reflections (at high scattering angles)
drop dramatically. This is due to the increased Debye-Waller
factor from the atomic vibrations and the disordering of the
atoms in the nanocrystals. Also, there are sharp spots in the
pattern recorded at 650 °C, suggesting the formation of larger-
size crystals due to the combination of nanocrystals. Finally,
the total diffraction intensity at 650 °C is significantly lower
than that at 25 °C, indicating the decrease in crystallinity of
the nanocrystals. All of these facts support that the nanocrystals
are experiencing a surface melting process at 650 °C.
nanocrystals in these samples average 4 nm in radius, δ is equal
to 1 nm, corresponding to the first few atomic layers of the
spherical surface. From this equation, γSL is estimated to be
2.0 N m-1. As the temperature continues to increase, δ also
increases (and r decreases), and γSL becomes 0 as the entire
particle turns into liquid and the surface interface disappears.
Owing to the increase in the curvature of the nanoparticle,
the solid-vapor surface tension, γSV, would normally increase
when compared to that of the bulk4 γSV, which is between 2.6
and 3.5 N m-1
. However, the calculation is not for the
outermost surface, but that of the interface between the two
phases present. Therefore, the decrease of the γSL can be
attributed to the increase in the total number of bonds formed
by the solid surface atoms (in comparison to the atoms on the
surface) owing to the wetting with the surrounding liquid layer.
This wetting, and subsequent bond formation, more than
compensates for the increase of γSV due to the large curvature
of the nanoparticle.
Finally, two points need to be mentioned. First, the macro-
scopic values were used in eq 1 for the heat of fusion and the
density. Upon heating the nanoparticle, the density and the heat
of fusion are expected to decrease. The change in these terms
would further decrease the value of γSL from that calculated
above. Second, as was shown recently by Petroski et al.,28 the
particle shape at room temperature is determined by the kinetics
of their formation (and not by the thermodynamics). Above
200 °C, each shape strives to be as near spherical in shape as
possible in order to decrease the surface tension and attain the
most thermodynamically stable configuration. This can be
accomplished initially by surface diffusion and finally by surface
melting.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the National
Science Foundation Grants CHE-9727633 and DMR-9733160.
References and Notes
(1) Ahmadi, T.; Wang, Z. L.; Green, T. C.; Henglein, A.; El-Sayed,
M. A. Science 1996, 272, 1924.
It is clear that surface melting at 650 °C occurs at much lower
temperatures than the melting point of the bulk (1769 °C).9
According to Buffat and Borel,11 the ratio of the melting
temperature of the cluster (T) with a radius r to that of the bulk
(T0) is given by
(2) (a) Ahmadi, T.; Wang, Z. L.; Henglein, A.; El-Sayed, M. A. Chem.
Mat. 1996, 8, 1161. (b) Wang, Z. L.; Ahmadi, T.; El-Sayed, M. A. Surf.
Sci. 1997, 380, 302.
(3) (a) Clint, J. H.; Collins, I. R.; Williams, J. A.; Robinson, B. H.;
Towey, T. F.; Cajean, P.; Khan-Lodhi, A. Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc.
1993, 95, 219. (b) Freund, P. L.; Spiro, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89, 1074.
(4) Solliard, C.; Flueli, M. Surf. Sci, 1985, 156, 487.
(5) Rampino, L. D.; Nord, F. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1942, 63, 2745.
(6) Henglein, A.; Ershov, B. G.; Malow, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99,
14129.
(7) (a) Follstaedt, D. M. Appl. Phys. Lett., 1993, 62, 1116. (b)
Eaglesham, D. J.; White, A. E.; Feldman, L. C.; Moriya, N.; Jacobson, D.
C. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1993, 70, 1643.
(8) Reiss, H.; Mirabel, P.; Whetten, R. L. J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92,
7241.
(9) Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 52nd ed.; The Chemical
Rubber Co.: Boca Raton, FL, 1971.
(10) Reiss, H.; Wilson, I. B. J. Colloid Sci. 1948, 3, 551.
(11) Buffat, P.; Borel, J. P. Phys. ReV. A 1976, 13, 2287.
(12) Goldstein, A. N.; Echer, C. M.; Alivasatos, A. P. Science 1992,
256, 1425.
γSL
FS
FL
T
T0
2
) -
+ γL 1 -
(1)
(
)
]
[
FSλ r - δ
where γSL is the solid-liquid surface tension and γL is the
surface tension of the liquid, δ is the liquid layer thickness, FS
and FL are the densities of the bulk solid and liquid, respectively,
and λ is the heat of fusion. The equation derived by Reiss et
al.8 is essentially the same, but the liquid layer thickness term
does not appear. Since the difference in the liquid and solid
densities27 is less than 2%, the last term in eq 1 is neglected.
Using this approximation, one gets an expression for γSL from
eq 1 to be
(13) Peppiat, S. J.; Sambles, J. R. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. 1975, A345,
387.
(14) Hahn, M. Y.; Whetten, R. L. Phys. ReV. Lett. 1988, 61, 1190.
(15) Sheng, P.; et al. J. Phys. C 1981, 14, L565.
(16) Solliard, C.; Surf. Sci 1981, 106, 58.
(17) Coombes, C. J. J. Phys. F 1972, 2, 441.
(18) Pawlow, P. Z. Phys. 1909, 66, 549.
(19) Brian, C. L.; Burton, J. J. J. Chem. Phys., 1975, 63, 2045.
(20) Berry, R. S.; Jellinek, J.; Natanson, G. Phys. ReV. A, 1984, 30,
919.
FSλ
2
T
T0
γSL ) 1 - r - δ
(2)
(
)
]
[
As the temperature increases, the liquid layer begins to form
on the surface of the nanocrystal. At 650 °C, the liquid layer
thickness is estimated to be approximately 25%. Since the Pt