Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 154 ͑2͒ A146-A149 ͑2007͒
A149
Table I. Comparison of the capacity in the limited potential range as the lithium-ion secondary batteries. We use the ratio of capacity in per
potential unit, which is defined as CЈ/⌬V, to estimate the lithium storage device and supercapacitor, here CЈ is the capacity and ⌬V is the limited
potential range.
Current in
the cell
͑mA͒
CЈ in
limited region
͑mAh/g
Rate
⌬V
͑V͒
CЈ/⌬V
−1
͑mAh/g V−1
−1
Material ͑Ref.͒
͑Ag−1
͒
͒
͒
Classify
This work
10.0
15.1
19.0
10.0
332
350
225
0.15–0.01 V
0.20–0.01 V
1.8–1.0 V
2370
1842
280
Secondary batteries
20.0
TiO –P O –SnO
10.0
Supercapacitor
2
2
5
2
1
5
CGMN
1
4
c-SWNT/TiO ͑TTB-acac͒
6.72
23.7
10
—
1.9
8
60
560
540
700
1.7–1.4 V
0.9–0.34 V
1.3–0.5 V
1.0–0.01 V
200
1000
675
Supercapacitor
Supercapacitor
Supercapacitor
Supercapacitor
2
8
SnO nanofibers
2
11
Ni/NiO
1
2
Ni/Fe O
13
11
707
2
3
8
sity. The solution of problem 5 is based on the high lithium-ion
diffusion coefficient of Li–Sn alloy. The lithium-ion diffusion coef-
ever, the absolute current of 1.9 mA in the cell for 23.7 A/g is
much smaller than those of other works due to the very small
amount of active materials. From Table I, only our device can be
called a lithium-ion secondary battery.
−
7
2
−1
16
ficient of 1.8–5.9 ϫ 10 cm s of Li7/3Sn is extremely large.
8,11-15
Previous reports
on high-rate lithium storage devices did not
consider the use of materials with high lithium-ion diffusion coeffi-
cients. Moreover, the electronic conductivity of the active materials
in the reports was lower than our metallic conductivity because the
other materials were metal oxides. In this work, the electronic con-
ductivity and lithium-ion diffusion coefficient are vastly improved,
thus attaining the flat plateau at the high-rate condition.
Conclusions
Electrodeposited tin dendrite indicates a large capacity of
20 mAh/g ͑10th cycle͒ based on the large flat plateau at high cur-
4
rent densities of 10 and 20 A/g. The metallic electron conductivity,
high lithium-ion diffusion coefficients, and self-nanoporous struc-
ture of tin during high-rate charge/discharge due to tin–lithium alloy
are suitable for the flat plateau at the high-rate condition. Moreover,
the small volume change based on the Sn–Li7/3Sn reaction results in
good cycle performance. The lithium-ion batteries based on this me-
tallic tin as the negative electrode are not super-capacitors but real
high-rate lithium secondary batteries with a flat plateau and good
cycle performance.
Second, the solution of problem 4, which is cycle performance,
at the high-rate condition is discussed. In a previous study using a
7
tin electrode, the cycle performance was very poor due to the large
volume change of the reaction Sn ꢀ Li4.4Sn. In this work, the pla-
teau of the reaction of LiSn ꢀ Li7/3Sn is focused. The reaction in-
dicates a long theoretical plateau because the reaction has the largest
lithium-storage reaction of 4/3 lithium ͑301 mAh/g͒ per unit in the
seven reactions as shown in Eq. 1-4. If the lithium-storage reaction
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology as-
sisted in meeting the publication costs of this article.
is not Sn ꢀ Li4 Sn but Sn ꢀ Li7/3Sn, the volume change is greatly
.4
decreased. In fact, the charge/discharge cycling curves performed at
+
1
A/g over the voltage range of 0.3–0.7 V vs a Li/Li reference
References
electrode indicate nearly perfect cycle performance as shown in Fig.
1
. P. Poizot, S. Laruelle, S. Grugeon, L. Dupont, and J. M. Tarascon, Nature (Lon-
don), 407, 496 ͑2000͒.
2. X. Wang, X. Chen, L. Gao, H. Zheng, Z. Zhang, and Y. Qian, J. Phys. Chem. B,
08, 16401 ͑2004͒.
. B. Gao, S. Sinha, L. Fleming, and O. Zhou, Adv. Mater. (Weinheim, Ger.), 13, 816
2001͒.
4. W. J. Weydanz, M. Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, and R. A. Huggins, J. Power Sources,
81–82, 237 ͑1999͒.
5. Y. Idota, T. Kubota, A. Matsufuji, Y. Maekawa, and T. Miyasaka, Science, 276,
5
a because the reaction of LiSn ꢀ Li7/3Sn is only occurred in the
windows of 0.3–0.7 V judging from Fig. 2a. In the case of the
high-rate condition, the plateau of LiSn ꢀ Li7/3Sn at 0.4 V in the
discharge process in the case of low rate ͑0.1 A/g͒ is decreased to
1
3
͑
0
.15 V due to the overpotential. It is considered that other lithium
storage potentials of Li7/3Sn → Li Sn → Li Sn → Li3.5Sn
2.5
2.6
+
→
Li4.4Sn are also decreased to less than 0.0 V vs Li/Li resulting
1
395 ͑1997͒.
from overpotential at the high-rate condition. The capacity at the
low-rate condition of 0.1 A/g after the cycling of 10 times at high-
rate condition of 20 A/g is larger than that of 20 A/g after 10 cy-
cling and similar to the that of 0.1 A/g as shown in Fig. 2a. There-
fore, the amount of stored lithium per unit is not 4.4 but near 7/3.
This small volume change based on the storage of 7/3 lithium
caused the good cycle performance. When the potential window is
6
. J. Yang, Y. Takeda, N. Imanishi, and O. Yamamoto, J. Electrochem. Soc., 146,
4009 ͑1999͒.
. M. Winter and J. Besenhard, Electrochim. Acta, 45, 31 ͑1999͒.
. N. Li and C. R. Martin, J. Electrochem. Soc., 148, A164 ͑2001͒.
. N. Tamura, R. Ohshita, M. Fujimoto, S. Fujitani, M. Kamino, and I. Yonezu,
J. Power Sources, 107, 48 ͑2002͒.
10. S. D. Beattie, T. Hatchard, A. Bonakdarpour, K. C. Hewitt, and J. R. Dahn,
J. Electrochem. Soc., 150, A701 ͑2003͒.
11. E. Hosono, S. Fujihara, I. Honma, and H. Zhou, Electrochem. Commun., 8, 284
7
8
9
+
more decreased such as 0.9–0.14 V vs a Li/Li reference electrode
͑2006͒.
at the high-rate condition of 20 A/g, the charge/discharge cycling
curves indicate good cycle performance as shown in Fig. 5b.
In Table I, the specific capacity in the limited voltage regions
among this work and other reported works for high-rate lithium-ion
12. E. Hosono, S. Fujihara, I. Honma, and H. Zhou, J. Electrochem. Soc., 153, A1273
͑2006͒.
1
3. T. Kudo, Y. Ikeda, T. Watanabe, M. Hibino, M. Miyayama, H. Abe, and K. Kajita,
Solid State Ionics, 152–153, 833 ͑2002͒.
4. I. Moriguchi, R. Hidaka, H. Yamada, T. Kudo, H. Murakami, and N. Nakashima,
Adv. Mater. (Weinheim, Ger.), 18, 69 ͑2006͒.
1
storage devices are compared. Other works have not shown the flat
plateau. Hence, the CЈ/⌬V of 2370 mAh/g−1
V
−1
in our work is
15. H. Zhou, D. Li, M. Hibino, and I. Honma, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 44, 797 ͑2005͒.
1
1
1
6. J. Wang, I. D. Raistrick, and R. A. Huggins, J. Electrochem. Soc., 133, 457 ͑1986͒.
7. Z. W. Fu and Q. Z. Qin, J. Phys. Chem. B, 104, 5505 ͑2000͒.
8. H. C. Shin, J. Dong, and M. Liu, Adv. Mater. (Weinheim, Ger.), 15, 1610 ͑2003͒.
much larger than those of other works and the range of voltage
change ⌬V ͑0.14 V͒ is very small. The CЈ/⌬V of about
−
1
−1
8
1000 mAh/g
V
of SnO nanofiber is also relatively high. How-
19. H. C. Shin and M. Liu, Adv. Funct. Mater., 15, 582 ͑2005͒.
2