(
)
H. Kanzow et al.rChemical Physics Letters 295 1998 525–530
529
particle becomes completely encapsulated, stopping
tubes after their formation and carbonises further.
This explains the amorphous coating of our graphitic
multiple tubes. By changing the reaction gas from
acetylene to carbon monoxide it may be possible to
Ž
.
further growth Fig. 4d .
Several studies have suggested that the inner di-
ameter of the nanofibres produced by the CVD
method is determined by the size of the catalyst
w
x
suppress the polymerisation 12 , but even in this
w
x
Ž
particles 9,12 . However, from our study, it seems
that this is only very roughly the case. Although
cluster sizes vary between 1 and 100 nm, the tubes
are generated in most cases with inner diameters of
3–10 nm. Our findings suggest rather that only
case we expect some amorphous product which is
inevitable if one has a plasma flame inside the
.
reactor . Further optimisation of laser and reaction
parameters should also lead to a higher quality of the
samples.
Ž
particles of a certain narrow size range from 15 to
.
25 nm are active for the formation of nanotubes.
5. Conclusions
The longish form of the inclusions we find indicates
that the nickel particles are at least partially molten
during the growth of the tube took place. From our
experiment we cannot decide whether the fibre for-
mation starts from a molten metal droplet, or if the
exothermic nature of the reaction combined with the
freezing-point depression due to the solvating of
carbon in the metal causes the melting. Bearing in
mind that similar multi-walled carbon nanotube for-
mation can take place at temperatures as low as
We have reported a new laser method for the
production of carbon nanotubes by the catalytic de-
composition of acetylene. With this method, multi-
walled tubes were obtained with inner diameters of
3–10 nm and outer diameters of 10–100 nm. TEM
analysis shows a high degree of graphitisation of
these tubes. The results obtained are in good agree-
ment with a growth model developed by Baker et al.
w x
w x
5 for the formation of carbon nonofibres.
3908C 3 , we did not address the melting by the
growth model we used.
The model restricts the range of catalyst particle
diameter where effective growth is possible. For
large particles the reaction is too slow due to the
long diffusion lengths. This explains why there is
almost no contribution of aggregates larger than 25
nm. These large particles become easily encapsulated
with excess carbon and completely inactive before
any fibre growth can start. The smaller the particles
are, the faster the growth rate should be. However,
Acknowledgements
This work has been funded by the German Min-
Ž
.
istry of Science and Technology BMBF under con-
tract No. 13N6705. The SEM pictures were taken by
J. Nissen, Central Institute for Electron Microscopy
Ž
.
ZELMI , Technical University Berlin. TEM was
performed by T. Link, Technical University Berlin,
and N. Pfander, Fritz-Haber-Institut Berlin. The lasers
¨
Ž
.
very small metal particles -3 nm are also not
useful for the growth of carbon nanotubes. To avoid
dangling bonds during the growth process the whole
tube cross-section must be in contact with the metal
surface. However, tubes of very small diameters are
energetically unfavourable because of their inner
strain. This implies that there is a minimum particle
were provided by the Laser and Medicine Technol-
Ž
.
ogy Berlin LMTB .
References
w x
1
L.V. Radushkevich, V.M. Lukyanovich, Zh. Fiz. Khim. 26
´
w x
diameter for the formation of nanotubes 6 . In our
Ž
.
1952 88.
reaction conditions only tubes with diameters larger
than 3 nm are formed. If the catalytic particle’s
diameter is less than this minimum tube size of 3
nm, no tubes can be formed.
In the hot reaction chamber the acetylene also
reacts with itself, leading to the formation of a
tar-like side product. This material condenses on the
w x
2
L.V. Radushkevich, V.M. Lukyanovich, Chem. Abstr. 47
´
Ž
.
1953 6210.
w x
3
L.J.E. Hofer, E. Sterling, J.T. McCartney, J. Phys. Chem. 59
Ž
.
1955 1153.
w x
4
P.A. Tesner, E.Y. Robinovich, I.S. Rafalkes, E.F. Arefieva,
Ž
.
Carbon 8 1970 435.
w x
5
R.T.K. Baker, M.A. Barber, P.S. Barber, P.S. Harris, F.S.
Ž
.
Feates, R.J. Waite, J. Catal. 26 1972 51.