Copper Tellurites Ba2Cu4Te4O11Cl4 and BaCu2Te2O6Cl2
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 37, No. 16, 1998 4047
Table 1. X-ray Crystallographic Data
space group, P21, was chosen after a refinement in P21/m failed to
yield a satisfactory model for the structure. Both structures were solved
by direct methods (TEXSAN)14 and refined on |F| by full-matrix least-
squares techniques in SHELXTL-PLUS.15 Absorption effects were
compensated for by the use of empirical ψ-scan data.16 All atomic
parameters in I were refined anisotropically, except for O(11), which
was refined isotropically. Due to the enlarged thermal parameters
associated with Cu(3) and Cu(4), a number of alternative refinements
were attempted. In one model, Cu(3) and Cu(4) were each separated
into two sites with half-occupancy 0.2 Å apart. Upon refinement, this
model diverged and the separate sites coalesced to their original single
positions. Alternatively, attempts at refining site occupancies of Cu(3)
and Cu(4) failed to yield improvements in the structural model, residual
peak densities, and refinement parameters. Further details are included
in Results and Discussion. All atomic parameters in II were refined
anisotropically, and a refinement in the opposite chirality was performed
to determine the best fit. The refinement with the lowest R and Rw
was used as the final structural solution. No higher symmetry was
detected for either compound with the MISSYM algorithm within the
PLATON program suite.17,18 Crystallographic details are given in Table
1. The final positional parameters, relevant interatomic distances, and
relevant bond angles for both compounds are given in Tables 2, 3, and
4, respectively. The anisotropic thermal parameters can be obtained
in the Supporting Information.
Physical Characterization. The magnetic susceptibility data were
determined using a Quantum Design SQUID magnetometer. A sample
(∼20 mg) of ground crystals of I was placed in a gelatin pill capsule
which was subsequently held in a standard plastic drinking straw.
Readings of the sample holder showed negligible diamagnetic effects
on the bulk sample. Room-temperature diffuse reflectance measure-
ments from 800 to 200 nm on compound I were made using a Shimadzu
UV3100 spectrophotometer equipped with an integrating sphere at-
tachment. Barium sulfate was used as the reflectance standard. The
reflectance data were converted to absorbance data using the Kubelka-
Monk function.19
empirical formula
space group
a (Å)
b (Å)
c (Å)
Ba2Cu4Te4O11Cl4 (I)
P1h (No. 2)
9.275(2)
12.135(2)
9.263(2)
98.23(3)
108.35(3)
110.90(3)
885.2(3)
2
5.091
162.06
1357.05
room temp
0.71073
0.0458
BaCu2Te2O6Cl2 (II)
P21 (No. 4)
7.434(2)
7.448(2)
8.271(2)
90
97.42(3)
90
454.1(2)
2
5.021
158.02
686.52
room temp
0.71073
0.0388
R (deg)
â (deg)
γ (eg)
V (Å3)
Z
F
calcd (g cm-3
)
µ (cm-1
)
fw (g mol-1
T (°C)
)
λ (Å)
Ra (Fo > 6σ(Fo))
Rwb (Fo > 6σ(Fo))
0.0678
0.0491
a R ) ∑||Fo| - |Fc||/∑|Fo|. b Rw ) [∑w{|Fo| - |Fc|}2/∑w|Fo| ]1/2
;
2
w ) 1/[σ2{|Fo|} + 0.0025{|Fo|}2.
Experimental Details
Synthesis. The compounds obtained in this study were prepared
using modifications on techniques reported by Rabenau.1 Compound
I, Ba2Cu4Te4O11Cl4, was originally prepared by loading BaCl2‚2H2O
(73 mg, 0.30 mmol, Strem, 99+%), CuO (48 mg, 0.60 mmol, Strem,
99.9%), and Te(OH)6 (138 mg, 0.603 mmol, Strem, 99.9%) into fused
silica tubes (5 mm i.d., 7 mm o.d., ∼1.6 cm3 sealed volume). A 0.7
mL amount (45% fill) of a 2 M NH4Cl solution was added, and the
tubes were flame-sealed after the solvent was frozen in liquid nitrogen.
The tubes were placed in a high-pressure autoclave with 2500 psi of
argon counter-pressure to prevent bursting of the tubes during reaction.
The autoclave was placed in a furnace and heated at 375 °C for 5 days,
after which the autoclave was removed directly from the furnace. After
cooling, I was obtained in ∼30% yield as green plates, with the
remainder of the products being the highly crystalline phases, Cu2Te3O8
(yellow plates)6 and TeO2 (clear prisms). The products were filtered,
washed with distilled water and acetone, and physically separated by
color. Compound I is indefinitely stable in air. It was subsequently
determined that yields of I approaching 50% could be achieved by
reacting BaCl2‚2H2O, CuO, and TeO2 (Strem, 99.9%) in a 1:2:2 ratio
in 5 M NH4Cl at 375 °C for 4 days.
Large, green prismatic crystals of BaCu2Te2O6Cl2 (II) were obtained
by heating a mixture of BaCl2‚2H2O (74 mg, 0.30 mmol), Cu2O (43
mg, 0.30 mmol, Strem, 99.9%), and Te(OH)6 (139 mg, 0.605 mmol)
in 1 M NH4Cl solution at 375 °C for 18 h. This material was obtained
at <10% yield with CuTeO4 as the major phase in the form of a yellow
polycrystalline powder. Longer reaction times with similar amounts
of starting materials yielded varying mixtures of I, Cu2Te3O8, and
CuTeO4.13 Compound II proved to be somewhat air or moisture
sensitive, as the material degraded after several days in air, but showed
no visible indications of decomposition after several weeks in mineral
oil.
Results and Discussion
Structure. Compound I, Ba2Cu4Te4O11Cl4, is a two-
dimensional compound with two types of layers situated in the
ac plane as shown in Figure 1. The structure is made up of
two copper tellurite layers separated by a copper chloride layer.
This arrangement of three layers is separated by a layer of
barium atoms. The copper tellurite layer consists of nearly
square planar CuO4 units, TeO3 pyramids, and TeO3+1 poly-
hedra. The copper chloride layer is made up of CuCl4 tetrahedra
and a CuCl2O unit, which is in essentially a distorted trigonal
planar arrangement.
The copper tellurite layer, shown in Figure 2 as a projection
in the ac plane, can be viewed as having Te4O11 subunits
alternating throughout the layer. These subunits are made by
joining two TeO3+1 polyhedra through an apical oxygen atom
and then adding TeO3 pyramids to the opposite apical atom of
each TeO3+1 polyhedra. These Te4O11 subunits are linked to
one another through copper atoms, which are connected to the
ends of two separate subunits and the center of a third.
All of the coordination polyhedra for copper and tellurium
in this layer are fairly regular and have been observed in other
compounds. The TeO3+1 polyhedra have equatorial Te-O
Qualitative SEM/EDS analyses on crystals of both compounds
verified the presence of Ba, Cu, Te, Cl, and O and the absence of any
impurity elements heavier than F.
Crystallography. Crystals of both phases were mounted onto the
ends of glass fibers using quick-drying epoxy and were studied using
a Rigaku AFC7R four-circle diffractometer equipped with graphite-
monochromated Mo KR (λ ) 0.710 73 Å) radiation. An ω-2θ scan
mode was utilized for room-temperature data collection for both
compounds. Three standard reflections measured after every 97
reflections indicated that the crystals were stable (<2% decay) for both
compounds, and 2θ limits of 52° for I and 55° for II were employed.
The intensity data were corrected for both Lorentz and polarization
effects. Additional data are included in Table 1.
(14) TEXSAN: Single-Crystal Structure Analysis Software, Version 1.6b;
Molecular Structure Corp.: The Woodlands, TX, 1993.
(15) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXTL-PLUS; Siemens Analytical X-Ray Instru-
ments, Inc.: Madison, WI, 1990.
(16) North, A. C. T.; Phillips, D. C.; Mathews, F. S. Acta Crystallogr.
1968, A24, 351.
(17) LePage, Y. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1987, 20, 264.
(18) Spek, A. L. Acta Crystallogr. 1990, A46, C34.
(19) Wendlandt, W. W.; Hecht, H. G. Reflectance Spectroscopy; Inter-
science Publishers: New York, 1966.
The centrosymmetric space group, P1h, was chosen for I on the basis
of lattice parameters and statistical tests. The systematic absence 0k0,
k ) 2n + 1, indicated that II could be either P21 or P21/m. The acentric
(13) Falck, L.; Lindqvist, O.; Mark, W. Acta Crystallogr. 1978, B34, 1450.