6408
J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 118, No. 14, 8 April 2003
Khriachtchev et al.
independent. It should be emphasized that the stretching ef-
fect is introduced in this model purely by kinetic factors
without including any time dependence of the rate constant.
Taking into account the smaller experimental stretching pa-
rameter obtained for HKrCl formation ͑ϳ0.55͒, we suggest
some annealing-induced modification of matrix morphology
in the present experiments. According to models ͑2͒–͑6͒, the
characteristic time of the product formation is inversely pro-
portional to the initial H and Cl concentration, which is in
accord with the experimental data ͓see Fig. 3͑b͔͒. Of course,
this simple kinetic model yields no concentration depen-
dence of the formation efficiency. The experimentally ob-
served decrease on the HKrCl formation efficiency for more
concentrated samples should be explained by experimental
factor, such as a relative increase of various traps for H at-
oms due to improper lattice structure, HCl multimers, etc.
Some losses of H atoms during photolysis might become
important for the concentrated samples.
in the matrix upon annealing. A strong experimental evi-
dence for this image is a nearly linear dependence of the
HKrCl formation time on the initial Kr/HCl ratio shown in
Fig. 3͑b͒.
Thus, we claim that the formation kinetics of HKrCl and
DKrCl reflects differences in thermal mobility of H and D
atoms with activation energies of approximately 64 and 68
meV. When compared with the literature data on H atom
mobility, our data is in perfect agreement with the activation
7
energy of 66 meV obtained by Eberline and Creuzburg, but
it is considerably smaller than the value of 90–140 meV
8
extracted by Vaskonen et al. A computational model quali-
tatively explained the different mobility of H and D atoms in
solid Xe even though it did not provide numerically accurate
9
results. The model estimated energies in the relaxed inter-
stitial and transition-state configurations of H and D atoms in
solid Xe taking into account the zero-point energies. Analo-
gous calculations would qualitatively support the H/D iso-
tope effect on thermal mobility in solid Kr as well. However,
in the present work, we do not repeat those calculations for
solid Kr because we believe that a more advanced theoretical
approach is needed to reach adequate description.
The present results show the kinetic difference between
reactions promoted by mobility of H and D atoms ͑see Fig.
4͒. It should be emphasized once more that we connect this
difference in formation of HKrCl and DKrCl with slower
thermal motion of D atoms compared with H atoms, i.e.,
with a smaller rate of the elementary jumps for deuterium. In
this consideration, we essentially assume that the reaction
barriers for the formation of HRgY molecules can be ne-
glected at ϳ30 K. This assumption is experimentally veri-
fied. Indeed, HKrCl and HKrF show identical formation ki-
C. D¿HKrCl reaction
As assumed in kinetic models ͑2͒–͑6͒, the formed
HKrCl molecules can further react with hydrogen atoms.
This process can be tested using different thermal mobility of
H and D atoms. HKrCl molecules are formed quickly upon
H mobility. Motion of D atoms spreads into a longer time
scale, after formation of the main part of HKrCl molecules.
If HKrCl molecules react with D atoms, these kinetic distinc-
tions should lead to a decrease of the HKrCl concentration
upon selective mobilization of D atoms. This qualitative pic-
ture was analyzed using kinetic models ͑2͒–͑6͒ with added
analogous reactions for D atoms. We assumed k /k ϭ8 and
3
netics upon the long-range H atom mobility, which would
not be the case if the reaction activation energy were impor-
tant. The formation of HKrCN occurs at similar temperatures
even though the detailed data is not available.23 The forma-
tion of HArF molecules takes place in solid Ar at tempera-
2
tures below 20, which is known to promote H mobility in
8
solid Ar. A part of the HRgY products always form at tem-
peratures that do not allow global motion of H atoms. Fol-
lowing Ref. 24, we call this phenomenon local ͑short-range͒
atomic mobility, and it was studied in details for formation of
H
D
͓
D
͔0 ͓ ͔0
/ H ϭ3, which corresponded to the experimental con-
2
5
HXeI. The presence of low-temperature local formation of
these molecules does not allow essential HϩRgϩY reaction
barriers. Moreover, the formation of HXeCl and HXeBr in
solid Ne at 12 K supports the very low intrinsic formation
barriers of the HRgY molecules.26 Thus, we conclude that
these reactions are mainly diffusion-controlled.
ditions. A representative result of the calculations is shown in
Fig. 8. The HKrCl concentration increases quickly, reaches
the maximum, and finally decreases by about 10%, which is
in remarkable agreement with experiment ͑see Fig. 4͒. The
simultaneous presence of H and D atoms in the matrix
changes the shapes of the kinetic curves compared with the
previous ‘‘D-free’’ consideration: The stretching parameters
for the build up of the HKrCl and DKrCl concentrations
become different, 1.02 and 0.81, respectively. This trend was
found qualitatively for the experimental data presented in
Fig. 4. The good agreement between the experimental and
computational data strongly support the efficient DϩHKrCl
and, consequently, HϩHKrCl reactions. Similarly to the ex-
periment, the simulation shows that the HKrCl concentration
increases and the DKrCl concentration decreases in similar
time scales. The similarity in these time scales means that the
DϩHKrCl reaction barrier does not exceed much the activa-
tion energy for thermal mobility of D atoms, i.e., the reaction
can be considered as diffusion-controlled. These conclusions
are analogous to those done by us earlier for the HϩHXeH
reaction.10
The spatial distribution of H atoms produced by solid-
state photolysis of HCl deserves brief discussion. As shown
earlier, the primary UV photolysis of HCl in solid Kr is an
5
essentially local event. This locality means stabilization of
escaping H atoms at small distances ͑comparable with the
lattice parameter͒ from the parent cage. After the successful
escape, the H atom can react with some probability with the
parent Cl–Kr center resulting in the HKrCl molecule. The
formed rare-gas molecules can be photodecomposed effi-
ciently, making the distribution of H atoms more homoge-
neous taking into account the large excess energy upon 193
nm photodissociation of HKrCl ͑ϳ5 eV͒. Additionally, light-
induced motion of H atoms can be promoted by neutraliza-
ϩ
23
tion of (KrHKr) ions. As a result of this homogenization,
H atoms lose memory of the parent cage and globally diffuse
This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP:
131.94.16.10 On: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 18:03:38