J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 10311-10312
10311
Scheme 1
Characterization of
Methylenepropenylidenecyclohexadiene Derivatives
and Their Competing 1,6-Electrocyclic Reaction and
1,7-Hydrogen Shift at Room Temperature
Mariella Mella, Mauro Freccero, and Angelo Albini*
Dipartimento Chimica Organica
UniVersita` di PaVia, Viale Taramelli 10
27100 PaVia, Italy
ReceiVed June 25, 1996
The interconversion between 1,3,5-hexatriene and 1,3-cyclo-
hexadiene and related electrocyclic reactions have been the
subject of many experimental and theoretical investigations.1
Thermal processes have been thermodynamically and kinetically
characterized and occur at relatively high temperatures.1b,c It
is interesting to characterize a system where the process occurs
at room temperature or below. Pentaene 2, expected to be
generated by photolysis of 1,2-dihydronaphthalene (1, Scheme
1), is an appropriate model, since there is a strong thermody-
namic drive toward rearomatization. The photochemistry of
compound 12 and of several of its derivatives3-8 has been
thoughroughly investigated, and the many products reported
have all been rationalized as arising from (thermal and
photochemical) ring closure, cycloaddition, and (whith alkyl-
substituted derivatives) sigmatropic rearrangements of o-xy-
lylenes of type 2.2-8 However, the generation of polyenes of
this type by the ring opening of fused cyclohexadienes has been
directly documented only in the particular case of triphenyl-
9,9a-dihydroanthracene.9 It occurred to us that incorporation
of conjugated substituents would allow direct observation of
this compound and a better discrimination between the following
reactions. We now report that polyenes of type 2 can be
spectroscopically and chemimically characterized starting from
some cyano derivatives of 1.
acetonitrile solution of 3 resulted in a conspicuous end of pulse
absorption between 370 and 500 nm (maximum at 450 nm, see
Figure 1a). This was red-shifted by 60 nm with respect to parent
o-xylylene12 and closely correponded to that reported for its
1,8-diphenyl derivative.9 Therefore, it was assigned to the
5-methylene-6-(2-propenylidene)-1,3-cyclohexadiene 4 (see
Scheme 1). Assuming that the absorbtivity of this compound
is close to that of o-xylylene12 allowed a rough evaluation of
the quantum yield for ring opening (Φe ca 0.1); this rearrange-
ment is expected to occur in the picosecond range.1e The
transient absorption showed a first-order decay, with k ) 4.2
s-1 at 25 °C. Since no irreversible reaction occurs under this
condition, this can be safely attributed to the thermally allowed
cyclization (k ) kc, Scheme 1).
Irradiation of the 1-benzyl derivative 5 caused an efficient
reaction leading to the alkenes 6 as a mixture of the four (two
main) stereoisomers (Scheme 1). No attempt to draw any
conclusion for the isomeric distribution was made due to the
easy E/Z isomerization of the alkene in steady state irradiations.
When the R,R-D2 derivative was used,10 selective deuterium
incorporation at the methyl group was observed (see Scheme
1). The quantum yield of reaction (see Table 1) was affected
little by deuteration. Flash photolysis evidenced a transient with
shape and intensity similar to the previous case (Figure 1b) but
much shorter-lived and with a marked deuterium effect [k(H)
) 440 s-1, k(D) ) 80 s-1, D effect of 5.5]. These data show
that the polyene 7 is formed and is the intermediate for the end
products, which arise through a [1,7]-sigmatropic hydrogen shift.
The efficiency of the photochemical ring opening is not greatly
changed with respect to the conversion of compound 3 into 4
(Φe ca 0.1 in both cases). With 5, this is near to the quantum
yield for the irreversible reaction. Since there is no reason to
expect that electrocyclic ring closure is significantly accelerated
in this case, the fast decay observed for 7 is attributed to
sigmatropic shift (k ) kc+ ks ≈ ks) in Scheme 1) with little
contribution from the electrocyclic reaction. In accord with this
mechanism, the deuterium effect shows up only on the decay
rate of the intermediate, not on the steady state quantum yield
of the final products [Φ ) Φeks/(kc+ ks), where ks . kc] and is
The dinitrile 310 underwent no irreversible reaction by
irradiation in both polar and apolar solvents (λ 254 nm, Φ-3 e
3 × 10-3). However, flash photolyzing (λ 254 nm)11 an
(1) (a) Woodward, R. B.; Hoffmann, R. The ConserVation of Orbital
Symmetry; Verlag Chemie, GmbH/Academic Press: Weinheim, 1970. (b)
Marvel, E. N. Thermal Electrocyclization Reactions in Organic Chemistry;
Academic Press: New York, 1980. (c) Bakulev, V. A. Russ. Chem. ReV.
1995, 64, 99. (d) Baldwin, J. E.; Reddy, V. P.; Schaad, L. J.; Hess, B. A.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 8554, 8555. (e) Reid, P. J.; Doig, S. J.;
Wickham, S. D.; Mathies, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 4754. (f)
Evanseck, J. D.; Thomas, B. E., IV; Spellmeyer, D. C.; Houck, K. N. J.
Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 7134. (g) Dolbier, W. R.; Koroniak, H.; Burton, D.
J.; Bailey, A. R.; Shaw, G. S.; Hansen, S. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984,
106, 1871 (h) McCullough, J. J. Acc. Chem. Res. 1980, 13, 270. (i) Okamura,
W. M.; De Lara, A. K. In ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M.,
Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 5, p 699.
(2) Salisbury, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1971, 737.
(3) Kleinhuis, H.; Wijting, R. L. C.; Havinga, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1971,
255.
(4) Widmer, U.; Heimgartner, H.; Schmid, H. HelV. Chim. Acta 1975,
58, 2210.
(5) Lamberts, J. J. M.; Laarhoven, W. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106,
1736.
(6) Lamberts, J. J. M.; Laarhoven, W. H. Recl. TraV. Chim. Pays-Bas
1984, 103, 131. Lamberts, J. J. M.; Cuppen, T. J. H. M.; Laarhoven, W. H.
J. Chem. Soc. 1985, 1819. Woning, J.; Lijten, F. A. T.; Laarhoven, W. H.
J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 2427.
(7) Laarhoven, W. H. L. Org. Photochem. 1987, 9, 129.
(8) Seeley, D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 4378.
(9) Grellmann, K. H.; Palmowski, J.; Quinkert, G. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1971, 10, 196.
(10) (a) The dihydronaphthalenedicarbonitriles 3, 5, and 8 were photo-
chemically prepared from 1,4-naphthalenedicarbonitrile, refs 10b,c. The
deuterated derivatives were prepared using R,R-D2-trimethylbenzylsilane.
(b) Albini, A.; Fasani, E.; Oberti, R. Tetrahedron 1982, 38, 1034. (c)
Sulpizio, A.; Albini, A.; d’Alessandro, A.; Fasani, E.; Pietra, S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1989, 111, 5773.
(12) Flynn, C. R.; Michl, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 3280.
(13) Baldwin, J. E.; Reddy, V. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 8051.
(14) Spangler, C. W. Chem. ReV. 1976, 76, 187.
(15) (a) More O’Ferral, R. A. J. Chem. Soc. B 1970, 785. (b) Kwart, H.
Acc. Chem. Res. 1982, 15, 401.
(11) By means of a Nd-YAG laser, λ ) 266 nm, pulse duration 10 ns,
power 20 mJ.
S0002-7863(96)02145-2 CCC: $12.00 © 1996 American Chemical Society