KIEs in Cycloreversion of Rhenium Diolates
A R T I C L E S
Scheme 1
cycloalkene or at the very least isomerize to the cis-cycloal-
kanediolate, which would then fragment. Similar arguments
discount the ionic mechanism, as does the absence of any
significant solvent effect and the relatively small Hammett F
value observed for extrusion of styrenes from Cp*Re(O)(diolato)
complexes (Cp* ) η-pentamethylcyclopentadienyl).11
The remaining possibilities are either the concerted mecha-
nism, or two stepwise processes involving migration of carbon.
One of the latter would form a metallaoxetane by migration to
the metal, or a coordinated epoxide12 via a migration to the
second diolate oxygen. Either would be a frontside migration
of carbon with retention of stereochemistry and would conclude
with a rapid concerted loss of alkene from the intermediate after
the initial rate-determining step.
Experiments to date have suggested that cleavage of only
one of the two C-O bonds occurs to any extent in the transition
state. The effect of strain in the CdC bond is expected to have
a significant impact on relative transition-state energies for either
cycloaddition or cycloreversion, due to the rehybridization of
the reacting carbon. However, this effect was observed only
for cycloaddition; furthermore, the quantitative impact on ∆Hq
implied a complete relief of strain at the cycloaddition transition
state. The invariance of ∆Hq for cycloreversion of strained and
unstrained disubstituted alkenes agrees that strain is not evident
by the cycloreversion transition state. Both observations are
consistent with a transition-state structure that lacks sp2
character. That at least one C-O bond is cleaved at or before
the transition state is confirmed by the observation of a
significant secondary deuterium KIE on extrusion of ethylene;
kH/kD4 ) 1.25 at 100 °C. This value by itself could be
rationalized with either the concerted (KIE per D ) 1.06) or
stepwise (KIE per D ) 1.13) mechanisms; efforts to perform a
Thornton analysis13 by measuring the KIE for extrusion of
ethylene-d2 were stymied by analytical complications arising
from fragmentation during mass spectrometry.14 However, the
combination of the strain effects with the KIE strongly suggested
a highly asynchronous and probably stepwise process in which
reorganization to an intermediate preceded development of the
new CdC π bond.
driven by entropy, and that incorporation of some strain into
the alkene CdC bond can favor cycloaddition to LReO3 in the
same fashion as alkenes add to OsO4.8 A series of mechanisms
considered for these reactions is seen in Scheme 1.
The high degree of stereospecificity9 (to the limit of detection,
taken as >95% by NMR) suggests that the first two of these,
homolytic and heterolytic cleavage of a C-O bond, are unlikely.
However, the standard restriction applies in that if either of these
intermediates were to cleave the second C-O bond faster than
bond rotation occurs, stereospecificity would be observed.
However, several further arguments mitigate against these
proposals. First, substituents such as a phenyl group would be
expected to stabilize the intermediate and lengthen its lifetime
sufficiently for bond rotation to occur; this is not seen. Second,
diolates of trans-cycloalkanediols are thermally stable, while
the isomeric cis-cycloalkanediolates fragment.10,26 Were a radical
to be produced, it would invert readily and collapse to the cis-
Further experiments agreed with this conclusion. Conforma-
tional analysis of a series of diolates suggested that a staggered
form enhanced the reaction rate, whereas a concerted reaction
presumably would be enhanced by an eclipsed geometry that
would allow proper orbital overlap in the incipient CdC π bond.
Such an effect is evidence that orientation of a C-O bond with
an orbital on rhenium is important. While a Hammett study on
styrene extrusion was uninformative, the curved behavior seen
for stilbene extrusion again suggested a competition between
(asynchronous) cleavage of the two different C-O bonds.
However, in the intervening years, application of high-level
computational methods to our system has strongly and consis-
tently suggested that the concerted process should be energeti-
cally favored over formation or fragmentation of a metalla-
(8) Gable, K. P.; Phan, T. N.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 3036-3037.
(9) Gable, K. P.; Juliette, J. J. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 955-962.
(10) Gable, K. P.; Phan, T. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 833-839.
(11) Gable, K. P.; Juliette, J. J. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2625-2633.
(12) Zhu, Z.; Al-Ajlouni, A. M.; Espenson, J. H. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35, 1408-
1409.
(13) Thornton, E. R.; Taagepara, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 1168-1177.
(14) Phan, T. N. M.S. Thesis, Oregon State University, 1994.
(15) (a) Deubel, D. V.; Frenking, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 2021-2031.
(b) Gisdakis, P.; Ro¨sch, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 697-701. (c)
Ko¨stlmeier, S.; Ha¨berlen, O. D.; Ro¨sch, N.; Herrmann, W. A.; Solouki,
B.; Bock, H. Organometallics 1996, 15, 1872-1878. (d) Pietsch, M. A.;
Russo, T. V.; Murphy, R. B.; Martin, R. L.; Rappe´, A. K. Organometallics
1998, 17, 2716-2719.
(16) (a) Torrent, M.; Deng, L.; Duran, M.; Sola, M.; Ziegler, T. Organometallics
1997, 16, 13-19. (b) Pidun, U.; Frenking, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1996, 35, 2817-2820. (c) Dapprich, S.; Ujaque, G.; Maseras, F.; Lledos,
A.; Musaev, D. G.; Morokuma, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11660-
11661.
(17) Singleton D. A.; Thomas, A. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 9357-
9358.
(18) Gable, K. P.; AbuBaker, A.; Zientara, K.; Wainwright, A. M. Organome-
tallics 1999, 18, 173-179.
(21) Corey, E. J.; Noe, M. C.; Grogan, M. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 4899-
4902.
(19) (a) Curtis, M. D.; Shiu, K.-B.; Butler, W. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986,
108, 1550-1561. (b) Skagestad, V.; Tilset, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993,
115, 5077-5083. (c) Etienne, M.; White, P. S.; Templeton, J. L.
Organometallics 1993, 12, 4010-4015. (d) Janiak, C. Chem. Ber. 1994,
127, 1379-1385.
(22) Schlosser, M.; Christmann, K. F. Ger. Pat. DE 1279678, 1968; Chem. Abstr.
1969, 70, 37429
(23) Seebach, D.; Ha¨ssig, R.; Gabriel, J. HelV. Chim. Acta 1983, 66, 308-337.
(24) Yoshino, T.; Manabe, Y.; Kikuchi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 4670-
4673.
(25) Melander, L.; Saunders, W. H. Reaction Rates of Isotopic Molecules;
Wiley: New York, 1980; pp 95-102.
(26) Ness, S. L. M.S. Thesis, Oregon State University, 1999.
(20) (a) Gajewski, J. J.; Peterson, K. B.; Kagel, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987,
109, 5545-5546. (b) Houk, K. N.; Loncharich, R. J.; Blake, J. F.; Jorgensen,
W. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 9172-9176. (c) Birney, D. M.; Houk,
K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 4127-4133.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 15, 2002 3971