isomerization and Claisen stereoselectivity. Reacting 1 with
2 mol % of Ir(PCy3)3BPh4 (3) at 75 °C elicited highly
Z-selective isomerization and concomitant sigmatropic re-
arrangement to directly generate the 2,2-disubstituted pen-
tenal derivative anti-4 (anti/syn ) 97:3, 60%) (Figure 2).
Figure 1. ICR-based strategy for quaternary carbon construction.
Claisen-based chiral quaternary carbon construction that
would share the operational simplicity and reliability char-
acterizing the Ireland-Claisen process.7,8 This account
describes the highly stereoselective construction of quaternary
carbon stereocenters via chemo- and stereoselective Ir(I)-
catalyzed isomerization of 1,1-disubstituted and trisubstituted
allylic ethers and in situ [3,3] sigmatropic rearrangement of
the resulting allyl vinyl ethers. These investigations reveal
several complementary strategies for the enantioselective
construction of all-carbon quaternary stereocenters based on
the ICR technology.
Achieving rigorous stereocontrol in the ICR-based Claisen
rearrangements is predicated on controlling vinyl ether
geometry during the initial olefin isomerization event. During
isomerization of 1,1-disubstituted or trisubstituted allyl ethers,
the limited energetic differentiation of the resulting E- or
Z-vinyl ethers raises concerns for controlling olefin geometry
and, ultimately, Claisen stereoselectivity. As a result, docu-
menting the capacity of metal-catalyzed isomerization of 1,1-
disubstituted or trisubstituted allylic ethers to deliver stereo-
defined trisubstituted vinyl ethers was an essential component
of these investigations. Moreover, enantioselective reaction
variants would be predicated on the 2,2-disubstituted vinyl
ether moieties causing limited disruption of chairlike transi-
tion states responsible for efficient transfer of substrate
chirality during bond reorganization.
Figure 2. Correlating ICR substrate regiochemistry and Claisen
diastereoselectivity.
The trisubstituted allyl ether 2 participated in similarly
stereoselective ICR reorganization to provide the syn-2,2,3-
trisubstituted pentenal syn-4 in 66% yield (syn/anti )
95:5). These preliminary investigations suggested that oxida-
tive insertion at allylic C-H bonds other than those adjacent
to oxygen was not operative in these reactions. Thus, the
regioisomeric di(allyl) ethers 1 and 2 are not subject to Ir-
(I)-catalyzed interconversion prior to vinyl ether formation,
and once generated, the unique vinyl ether isomers 5 and 6
are immune to scrambling of olefin geometry that would
accompany random allylic C-H insertion. This observation
correlates olefin regiochemistry, rather than olefin stereo-
chemistry, with the stereochemical outcome of the [3,3]
sigmatropic rearrangement.
Analyzing the data presented in Table 1 reveals the general
access to quaternary carbon stereocenters afforded by the
ICR methodology. A variety of 1,1-disubstituted allylic ethers
(e.g., 7) possessing aliphatic alkyl, branched alkyl, and
protected oxygen substituents undergo highly diastereo-
selective ICR reorganization to generate the stereodefined
R,R-disubstituted pentenals 8a-e (dr ) 97:3-87:13) (entries
a-e).9 Claisen rearrangement of the benzyl-substituted allylic
ethers 7c and 7d serves to highlight that olefin isomerization
is highly regioselective even when resonance-stabilized
styrene formation is a possible competing pathway. Trisub-
stituted allyl ethers 7g and 7h also afford efficient conduits
to all-carbon stereocenters, delivering Claisen adducts 8g and
8h with excellent syn stereocontrol of the vicinal quaternary-
Preliminary efforts addressing these issues employed ethers
1 and 2 as representative test substrates for assaying olefin
(6) Selected recent examples of stereoselective quaternary carbon
construction via [3,3] sigmatropic rearrangement of allyl vinyl ethers: (a)
May, J. H.; Stoltz, B. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12426-12427. (b)
Nordmann, G.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4978-4979.
(c) Miyamoto, H.; Okawa, Y.; Nakazaki, A.; Kobayashi, S. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2274-2277.
(7) (a) Nelson, S. G.; Bungard, C. J.; Wang, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 13000-13001. (b) Nelson, S. G.; Wang, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 4232-4233.
(8) Other examples of olefin isomerization-Claisen rearrangements: (a)
Reuter, J. M.; Salomon, R. G. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42, 3360-3364. (b)
Wille, A.; Tomm, S.; Frauenrath, H. Synthesis 1998, 305-308. (c)
Higashino, T.; Sakaguchi, S.; Ishii, Y. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 4193-4195. (d)
Ben Ammar, H.; Le Noˆtre, J.; Salem, M.; Kaddachi, M. T.; Dixneuf, P. H.
J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 662, 63-69. (e) Le Noˆtre, J.; Brissieux, L.;
Se´meril, D.; Bruneau, C.; Dixneuf, P. H. Chem. Commun. 2002, 1772-
1773. (f) Schmidt, B. Synlett 2004, 1541-1544. (g) Nevado, C.; Echavarren,
A. M. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 9735-9744.
(9) The relative stereochemistry for 8a was established by X-ray
diffraction analysis of the corresponding semicarbazide derivative; data are
provided in the Supporting Information.
2326
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 12, 2007