Published on Web 12/13/2007
Target-Specific Chemical Acylation of Lectins by
Ligand-Tethered DMAP Catalysts
Yoichiro Koshi,† Eiji Nakata,† Masayoshi Miyagawa,† Shinya Tsukiji,†
Tomohisa Ogawa,‡ and Itaru Hamachi*,†
Contribution from the Department of Synthetic Chemistry and Biological Chemistry, Graduate
School of Engineering, Kyoto UniVersity, Katsura, Kyoto 615-8510, Japan, and Department of
Biomolecular Sciences, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku UniVersity,
Sendai 981-8555, Japan
Received July 30, 2007; E-mail: ihamachi@sbchem.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Abstract: Because sugar-binding proteins, so-called lectins, play important roles in many biological
phenomena, the lectin-selective labeling should be useful for investigating biological processes involving
lectins as well as providing molecular tools for analysis of saccharides and these derivatives. We describe
herein a new strategy for lectin-selective labeling based on an acyl transfer reaction directed by ligand-
tethered DMAP (4-dimethylaminopyridine). DMAP is an effective acyl transfer catalyst, which can activate
an acyl ester for its transfer to a nucleophilic residue. To direct the acyl transfer reaction to a lectin of
interest, we attached the DMAP to a saccharide ligand specific for the target lectin. It was clearly
demonstrated by biochemical analyses that the target-selective labeling of Congerin II, an animal lectin
having selective affinity for Lactose/LacNAc (N-acetyllactosamine), was achieved in the presence of Lac-
tethered DMAPs and acyl donors containing probes such as fluorescent molecules or biotin. Conventional
peptide mapping experiments using HPLC and tandem mass-mass analysis revealed that the acyl transfer
reaction site-specifically occurred at Tyr 51 of Cong II. This strategy was successfully extended to other
lectins by changing the ligand part of the ligand-tethered DMAP. We also demonstrated that this labeling
method is applicable not only to purified lectin in test tubes, but also to crude mixtures such as E. coli
lysates or homogenized animal tissue samples expressing Congerin.
Introduction
example, employment of a conventional assay based on tight
antigen-antibody binding such as pull-down technique is not
Advanced glycobiology and glycochemistry techniques have
recently demonstrated that many saccharides and their deriva-
tives play pivotal roles in various biological events by interacting
with the corresponding sugar-binding proteins.1,2 Therefore,
characterization of these sugar-binding proteins, so-called lectins
or other relevant proteins, is important for understanding the
complicated biological phenomena involving sugars.3,4 Selective
labeling of lectins should be useful for investigating the
biological roles of these proteins in detail,5,6 as well as for
providing useful molecular tools for analyzing saccharides.7 For
applicable for the study of the sugar-lectin interactions because
the normal sugar-lectin interactions are not sufficiently strong.
In such cases, it is expected that selective covalent labeling of
lectins can be alternative to these assays, as well as a microarray
analysis.8,9
For protein labeling, bio-orthogonal organic chemistry toward
protein surfaces represents one of the key methodologies. In
(7) (a) Nagase, T.; Nakata, E.; Shinkai, S.; Hamachi, I. Chem.-Eur. J. 2003,
9, 3660-3669. (b) Hamachi, I.; Nagase, T.; Shinkai, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 12065-12066. (c) Nakata, E.; Koshi, Y.; Koga, E.; Katayama,
Y.; Hamachi, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 13253-13261. (d) Koshi,
Y.; Nakata, E.; Hamachi, I. ChemBioChem 2005, 6, 1349-1352.
(8) (a) Tomizaki, K.; Usui, K.; Mihara, H. ChemBioChem 2005, 6, 782-799.
(b) Shin, I.; Park, S.; Lee, M.-r. Chem.-Eur. J. 2005, 11, 2894-2901. (c)
Park, S.; Lee, M.-r.; Pyo, S.-J.; Shin, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4812.
(d) Park, S.; Shin, I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3180. (e) Burn, M.
A.; Disney, M. D.; Seeberger, P. H. ChemBioChem 2006, 7, 421. (f) Diseny,
M. D.; Seeberger, P. H. Chem. Biol. 2004, 11, 1701. (g) Adams, E. W.;
Ratner, D. M.; Bokesch, H. R.; McMahon, J. B.; O’Keefe, B. R.; Seeberger,
P. H. Chem. Biol. 2004, 11, 875. (h) Blixt, O.; et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 2004, 101, 17033. (i) Bryan, M. C.; Lee, L. V.; Wong, C.-H. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 3185.
(9) (a) Koshi, Y.; Nakata, E.; Yamane, H.; Hamachi, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 10413-10422. (b) Hsu, K.-L.; Pilobello, K. T.; Mahal, L. K.
Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006, 2, 153-157. (c) Kuno, A.; Uchiyama, N.; Koseki-
Kuno, S.; Ebe, Y.; Takashima, S.; Yamada, M.; Hirabayashi, J. Nat. Meth.
2005, 2, 851-856. (d) Zheng, T.; Peelen, D.; Smith, L. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 9982-9973. (e) Pilobello, K. T.; Krishnamoorthy, L.;
Slawek, D.; Mahal, L. K. ChemBioChem 2005, 6, 985-989. (f) Chen, S.;
LaRoche, T.; Hamelinck, D.; Bergsma, D.; Brenner, D.; Simeone, D.; Brand,
R. E.; Haab, B. B. Nat. Meth. 2007, 4, 437-444.
† Kyoto University.
‡ Tohoku University.
(1) Varki, A.; Cummings, R.; Esko, J. D.; Freeze, H.; Hart, G. W.; Marth, J.
Essentials of Glycobiology; Cold Spring Harbor Press: Cold Spring Harbor,
NY, 1999.
(2) (a) Bertozzi, C. R.; Kiessling, L. L. Science 2001, 291, 2357-2364. (b)
Dewk, R. A. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 683-720.
(3) Sharon, N.; Lis, H. Lectins; Springer: Netherlands, 2004.
(4) (a) Lis, H.; Sharon, N. Chem. ReV. 1998, 98, 637-674. (b) Dam, T. K.;
Brewer, C. F. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 387-429.
(5) Liver, D.; Arnqvist, A.; Ogren, J.; Firck, I.-M.; Kersulyte, D.; Incecik, E.
T.; Berg, D. E.; Covacci, A.; Engstrand, L.; Boren, T. Science 1998, 279,
373-377.
(6) (a) Lee, M-r.; Jung, D.-W.; Williams, D.; Shin, I. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 5477-
5480. (b) Hatanaka, Y.; Kempin, U.; Jong-Jip, P. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65,
5639-5643. (c) Romaninouk, A. V.; Silva, A.; Feng, J.; Vijay, I. K.
Glycobiology 2004, 14, 301-310. (d) Kitamura, N.; Ikikita, M.; Sato, T.;
Akimoto, Y.; Hatanaka, Y.; Kawakami, H.; Inomata, M.; Fukukara, K.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102, 2796-2801.
9
10.1021/ja075684q CCC: $40.75 © 2008 American Chemical Society
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2008, 130, 245-251
245