J. K. Barbay et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 2544–2548
2547
Table 6. Human liver microsome (HLM) stability and rat pharmacokinetic profile of compound 27a
Compound
HLM stability
(t1/2, min)
Cmax, po SD
(lM)
Cl, iv SD
(mL/min/kg)
t1/2, po SD
(h)
F (%)
27
54
1.3 0.3
31
4
1.8 0.2
59
a Dosed po at 10 mg/kg, iv at 2 mg/kg, n = 4.
thylamine subseries (Table 2). Compound 27, bearing an
N-ethyl-1-naphthylamine substituent, had an IC50 of
100 nM. Modest changes to the N-alkyl group (ethyl
to methyl or 2-hydroxyethyl, 28–29) were tolerated,
while replacing this group with an acetyl substituent re-
sulted in lM level activity. Removal of the N-alkyl
group caused a decrease in activity (31, >10 lM). The
naphthalene group was also required; N-ethyl secondary
amine 32 did not display significant antagonist activity.
Attachment of the amine substituent at the 1-position of
the naphthalene ring appeared to be preferred, as 2-
naphthyl analog 33 displayed decreased activity. A small
set of methoxy-substituted 1-naphthylamines (35–37)
generally displayed reduced activity, with 6-methoxy
substitution affording the most active compound (35,
180 nM). 1,2,3,4-Tetrahydronaphthalenes 38–41 (each
tested as a single diastereomer) displayed activities rang-
ing from 820 nM to 8.1 lM, while reduction of the
naphthalene to the 5,6,7,8-tetrahydronaphthalene was
better tolerated (42, 220 nM). Replacement of the naph-
thalene with an unsubstituted phenyl reduced activity
(43, 7.9 lM) as did the homologation to the naphtha-
len-1-ylmethanamine 45 (>10 lM).
The effect of the stereochemistry of 27 on its C5aR
antagonist activity was investigated. The enantiomers
of this compound were resolved by chiral supercritical
fluid chromatography (SFC). The levorotary enantio-
mer (absolute stereochemistry undetermined) was
shown to be primarily responsible for activity ((À)-27
IC50 27 nM; (+)-27 IC50 > 10 lM).
The human liver microsome stability and pharmacoki-
netic profile of racemic 27 in rats were determined
(Table 6). The compound displayed 59% oral bioavail-
ability. It had reasonable human liver microsome stabil-
ity (t1/2 54 min; 88% remaining at 10 min), but displayed
moderate clearance (31 mL/min/kg).
In conclusion, a series of substituted 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-
quinoline C5aR antagonists was discovered. Structure–
activity relationships at the 2-, 4-, and 5-position of
the tetrahydroquinoline core were studied. The com-
pounds displayed activity in binding (displacement of
[
125I]-C5a) and functional (C5a-induced calcium mobili-
zation) assays in a human cell line. These results add to
the growing body of evidence that C5aR can be potently
antagonized with non-peptidic small molecules. Further
exploration of the series will be reported separately.
In the next phase of the study the N-ethyl-1-naphthalene
substituent was held constant while the aryl group at the
2-position was varied (Table 3). In general, 2,6-disubsti-
tuted analogs (46–49) were more potent C5a receptor
antagonists than 2-monosubstituted compounds (50–
54). Continuing the trend, the unsubstituted phenyl ana-
log 56 did not show significant activity, nor did several
heterocycles unsubstituted at the ortho carbons (57–
59). These results suggest that maintaining a twisted
biaryl conformation is important for activity.
Acknowledgments
We thank the ADME team (J&JPRD, Spring House,
PA) for pharmacokinetic data, Michel Carpentier
(J&JPRD, Beerse, Belgium) for enantiomeric separation
of compound 27, and Dr. Christopher Teleha (J&JPRD,
Spring House, PA) for supplying intermediate 5.
Finally, structure–activity relationships at the 4-position
were explored by varying this group while holding con-
stant the N-ethyl-1-naphthylamine and 2,6-diethylphe-
nyl substituents (Table 4). Alkoxy groups larger than
methoxy groups were found to be capable of improving
activity (ethoxy, 67 nM; cyclopentoxy, 37 nM). Re-
moval of this substituent, or replacement with a chloro,
resulted in lower potency (IC50 > 10 and 2.0 lM, respec-
tively). A thiomethyl replacement for the methoxy group
was tolerated (82 nM).
References and notes
1. (a) Morgan, B. P. Complement. Clinical Aspects and
Relevance to Disease; Academic Press Limited: London,
1990; (b) Gasque, P. Mol. Immunol. 2004, 41, 1089.
2. Gerard, C.; Gerard, N. P. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1994, 12,
775.
3. (a) Makrides, S. C. Pharmacol. Rev. 1998, 50, 59; (b)
Mizuno, M.; Morgan, B. P. Curr. Drug Targets Inflamm.
Allergy 2004, 3, 87; (c) Ricklin, D.; Lambris, J. D. Nat.
Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 1265.
The binding affinity of selected compounds to the C5a
receptor was assessed by their ability to displace [125I]-
C5a from differentiated U937 cells (Table 5).11 A num-
ber of compounds demonstrated binding to the receptor
with high affinity (for instance, compound 27, Ki
8.9 nM). These results provide evidence that the ob-
served functional antagonism of members of the series
is a consequence of binding to C5aR (as opposed to a
mechanism involving the downstream signaling
cascade).
4. (a) Zareba, K. M. Drugs Today 2007, 43, 539; (b) Rother,
R. P.; Rollins, S. A.; Mojcik, C. F.; Brodsky, R. A.; Bell,
L. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 1256.
5. Holland, M. C. H.; Morikis, D.; Lambris, J. D. Curr.
Opin. Investig. Drugs 2004, 5, 1164.
6. Reviews: (a) Wong, A. K.; Taylor, S. M.; Fairlie, D. P.
iDrugs 1999, 2, 686; (b) Pellas, T. C.; Wennogle, L. P.
Curr. Pharm. Des. 1999, 5, 737; (c) Taylor, S. M.; Fairlie,
D. P. Exp. Opin. Ther. Patents 2000, 10, 449; (d)
Sumichika, H. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs 2004, 5, 505;
(e) Hutchison, A. J.; Krause, J. E. Annu. Rep. Med. Chem.