5698
N. Kanoh et al. / Tetrahedron 64 (2008) 5692–5698
In the typical LC/MS runs, MS/MS of selected precursor ions
were also monitored. This facilitated matching of peaks between
separate runs, even if there were some variations in retention time,
which may be caused by a limited pumping reproducibility at the
low-flow rate gradient.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Ms. A. Asami for her technical support. This
work was supported in part by the Daiichi Pharmaceutical Award in
Synthetic Organic Chemistry; the Chemical Biology Project of
RIKEN; grants from the MEXT, Japan; and a Grant-in-Aid for Sci-
entific Research (C) (No. 17510187) from JSPS, Japan.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in
References and notes
1. Brunner, J. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1993, 62, 483–514.
2. Richards, F. M.; Lamed, R.; Wynn, R.; Patel, D.; Olack, G. Protein Sci. 2000, 9,
2506–2517.
3. Craig, P. O.; Ureta, D. B.; Delfino, J. M. Protein Sci. 2002, 11, 1353–1366.
4. Gomez, G. E.; Cauerhff, A.; Craig, P. O.; Goldbaum, F. A.; Delfino, J. M. Protein Sci.
2006, 15, 744–752.
5. Kanoh, N.; Kumashiro, S.; Simizu, S.; Kondoh, Y.; Hatakeyama, S.; Tashiro, H.;
Osada, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5584–5587.
6. Kanoh, N.; Kyo, M.; Inamori, K.; Ando, A.; Asami, A.; Osada, H. Anal. Chem. 2006,
78, 2463–2468.
7. Dilly, S. J.; Bell, M. J.; Clark, A. J.; Marsh, A.; Napier, R. M.; Sergeant, M. J.;
Thompson, A. J.; Taylor, P. C. Chem. Commun. 2007, 2808–2810.
8. Kanoh, N.; Asami, A.; Kawatani, M.; Honda, K.; Kumashiro, S.; Takayama, H.;
Simizu, S.; Amemiya, T.; Kondoh, Y.; Hatakeyama, S.; Tsuganezawa, K.; Utata, R.;
Tanaka, A.; Yokoyama, S.; Tashiro, H.; Osada, H. Chem. Asian J. 2006, 1, 789–797.
9. Kanoh, N.; Honda, K.; Simizu, S.; Muroi, M.; Osada, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2005, 44, 3559–3562.
10. Kuramochi, K.; Haruyama, T.; Takeuchi, R.; Sunoki, T.; Watanabe, M.; Oshige,
M.; Kobayashi, S.; Sakaguchi, K.; Sugawara, F. Bioconjugate Chem. 2005, 16,
97–104.
Figure 7. Distribution of C–H and O–H insertion products from the photolysis of 1 in
alcohols. The reactions were performed at room temperature (liquid phase: designated
as L) and at ꢀ196 ꢁC (solid phase: S). Graphs and numerical values within or near each
bar refer to the percentages of the products that were generated by the insertion of the
carbenes into the chemical bonds shown in the same color. *Total percentage of C–H
insertion product from three equivalent C–H bonds.
11. Choi, J. W.; Chen, J.; Schreiber, S. L.; Clardy, J. Science 1996, 273, 239–242.
12. Ki, S. W.; Ishigami, K.; Kitahara, T.; Kasahara, K.; Yoshida, M.; Horinouchi, S.
J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 39231–39236.
13. Importance of high reactivity and low functional group selectivity of the photo-
generated carbenes as small molecule capturing agents have been discussed
earlier. See Refs. 5 and 8.
14. Quite recently, Schreiber and Koehler et al. reported a new capture strategy that
allows immobilization of common reactive functional groups present in both
synthetic and natural compounds. See: (a) Bradner, J. E.; McPherson, O. M.;
Mazitschek, R.; Barnes-Seeman, D.; Shen, J. P.; Dhaliwal, J.; Stevenson, K. E.;
Duffner, J. L.; Park, S. B.; Neuberg, D. S.; Nghiem, P.; Schreiber, S. L.; Koehler, A.
N. Chem. Biol. 2006, 13, 493–504; (b) Bradner, J. E.; McPherson, O. M.; Koehler,
A. N. Nat. Protocol 2006, 1, 2344–2352; (c) Schmitz, K.; Haggarty, S. J.;
McPherson, O. M.; Clardy, J.; Koehler, A. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 11346–
11347.
cycle was repeated another three more times. The photolyzed
sample was stored at ꢀ20 ꢁC until analyzed by LC/ESI-MS.
4.4. LC/MS and LC/MS/MS analyses of the photolysis products
The photolyzed solution was typically diluted 1/100 with water
or 0.05% aq formic acid and analyzed with a 4000Q TRAP mass
spectrometer (MSD Sciex, Foster City, CA, USA) equipped with an
Agilent 1100 LC system using the following conditions.
Flow rate: 100 ml/min.
15. Platz, M. S. Kinetics and Spectroscopy of Carbenes and Biradicals; Platz, M. S., Ed.;
Plenum: New York, NY, 1990; pp 143–212.
16. Tomioka, H. Res. Chem. Intermed. 1994, 20, 605–634.
17. Gupta, C. M.; Costello, C. E.; Khorana, H. G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1979, 76,
3139–3143.
18. Brunner, J.; Senn, H.; Richards, F. M. J. Biol. Chem. 1980, 255, 3313–3318.
19. Nassal, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 7540–7545.
Solvent A: 0.05% formic acid in water (HPLC grade).
Solvent B: 0.05% formic acid in acetonitrile (HPLC grade).
Gradient: 5%B/0–5 min; 5–45%B/5–65 min; 45–80%B/65–70 min.
Column: Inertsil ODS-3 1.5 mm i.d.ꢂ200 mm (GL Science, Tokyo,
Japan).
20. Platz, M.; Admasu, A. S.; Kwiatkowski, S.; Crocker, P. J.; Imai, N.; Watt, D. S.
Bioconjugate Chem. 1991, 2, 337–341.
Column oven temperature: 25 ꢁC.
21. Delfino, J. M.; Schreiber, S. L.; Richards, F. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 3458–
3474.
22. Tomioka, H.; Suzuki, S.; Izawa, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 3156–3162.
23. The structures of these compounds were determined by comparison with
authentic synthetic samples. See Supplementary data.
Typical injection volume: 1
Ionization mode: ESIþ.
LC/MS scan mode: Q3.
LC/MS/MS scan mode: Triple Quadrupole (Q3 scan with Q1 pre-
cursor selection).
mL.
24. Diderich, G. Helv. Chim. Acta 1972, 55, 2103–2111.
25. Bethell, D.; Stevens, G.; Tickle, P. J. Chem. Soc. D 1970, 792–794.
26. Production of 5 was below the detection limit in this case.
27. Closs, G. L.; Rabinow, B. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 8190–8198.
MS/MS (low-energy CID) condition: 45 V collision energy, N2 col-
lision gas.