Kato et al. have reported on the synthesis of longithorone
B,3 and Shair and co-workers have prepared a dimeric
member of the longithorone family, longithorone A.4 Herein,
we report the first application of auxiliaries that engage in
quadrupolar interactions in a total synthesis objective: the
preparation of the macrocyclic portion of longithorone C.
The synthetic challenge of preparing extremely rigid
macrocycles, such as the [12]paracyclophane core of lon-
githorone C, in an efficient and asymmetric fashion encour-
aged us to develop new methods for enabling difficult
macrocyclizations.5 In 2006, we reported the use of perfluo-
robenzyl ester auxiliaries as conformational control elements
for macrocyclizations using olefin metathesis.6 In 2007, we
reported that 3,5-bistrifluoromethylbenzyl ester auxiliaries
were also effective and demonstrated their utility in en-yne
metathesis macrocyclizations.7 The fluoroarene auxiliaries
are believed to engage in noncovalent interactions with the
macrocyclic precursors, coercing the substrate into a con-
formation conducive to ring closure.8
Our initial studies into the use of these auxiliaries were
conducted using substrates that contained oxygen atoms
attached to the arene core that would become part of the
formed macrocycle. We had reported that molecular model-
ing studies suggested that the fluorinated rings of the
auxiliaries engage in 1p-π interactions with the lone pairs
of the oxygen atoms, resulting in a preference for a “closed”
conformation that is conducive to ring closure.6,9 The
molecular modeling studies also suggested that the 3,5-
bistrifluoromethylbenzyl ester auxiliaries would be more
effective in these model substrates. This hypothesis was also
proven correct through experiment.7 However, in the absence
of oxygen-containing substrates, like those found in the
longithorone family of natural products, the molecular
modeling studies suggested that the pentafluorobenzyl aux-
iliary would be more effective (Figure 2). Molecular model-
ing suggested that the ester 2 would prefer a conformation
2-S in which a quadrupolar interaction would be present,
Figure 2. Comparison of pentafluorobenzyl and 3,5-bistrifluoro-
methylbenzyl ester auxiliaries by molecular modeling.
over the conformation 2-O by -0.55 kcal/mol.10 Similarly,
the ester 3 would also prefer conformation 3-S over 3-O,
however, only by -0.41 kcal/mol.7 To investigate whether
the molecular modeling studies could be used to predict
which auxiliaries would be more effective for a given
substrate, we undertook the synthesis of the carbon skeleton
of longithorone C to probe the efficiency of our auxiliaries
and the results of the previous molecular modeling study.
Hence, the carbon skeleton of longithorone C, represented
by 4 (Figure 3), could arise from a macrocyclic relay ring
(3) Kato, T.; Nagae, K.; Hoshikawa, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40,
1941–1944.
(4) (a) Layton, M. E.; Morales, C. A.; Shair, M. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2002, 124, 773–775. (b) Morales, C. A.; Layton, M. E.; Shair, M. D. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. 2004, 101, 12036–12041.
(5) Some difficult macrocyclizations have been aided by the use of
substituted methylenes as gearing elements. See reference 4 and: (a)
Commeureuc, A. G. J.; Murphy, J. A.; Dewis, M. L Org. Lett. 2003, 5,
2785–2788. (b) Kim, S. H.; Figueroa, I.; Fuchs, P. L. Tetrahedron Lett.
1997, 38, 2601–2604.
Figure 3. Retrosynthetic analysis of the carbon skeleton of
(6) (a) El-azizi, Y.; Schmitzer, A.; Collins, S. K. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2006, 45, 968–973. (b) Collins, S. K.; El-Azizi, Y. Pure Appl. Chem.
2006, 78, 783–789.
longithorone C.
(7) Collins, S. K.; El-Azizi, Y.; Schmitzer, A. R. J. Org. Chem. 2007,
72, 6397–6408.
closing metathesis (RRCM)11 of ester 5. The preparation of
the macrocyclization precursor 5 required the installation of
two carbon-arene bonds. We envisioned preparing these
bonds through copper-catalyzed Grignard reactions, made
possible by combining recent methods for Mg-I exchanges
(8) For some recent uses of quadrupolar interactions, see:(a) Marsella,
M. J.; Wang, Z.-Q.; Reid, R. J.; Yoon, K. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 885–887. (b)
Gorske, B. C.; Blackwell, H. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14378–
14387. (c) Woll, M. G.; Hadley, E. B.; Mecozzi, S.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15932–15933. (d) Watt, S. W.; Dai, C.; Scott, A. J.;
Burke, J. M.; Thomas, R. L.; Collings, J. C.; Viney, C.; Clegg, W.; Marder,
T. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3061–3063. (e) Collings, J. C.;
Batsanov, A. S.; Howard, J. A. K.; Dickie, D. A.; Clyburne, J. A. C.; Jenkins,
H. A.; Marder, T. B. J. Fluorine Chem. 2005, 126, 515–519. (f) Collings,
J. C.; Burke, J. M.; Smith, P. S.; Batsanov, A. S.; Howard, J. A. K.; Marder,
T. B. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 3172–3178.
(10) For a recent molecular modeling study on quadrupolar interactions
with pentafluorobenzenes, see: Gung, B. W.; Amicangelo, J. C. J. Org.
Chem. 2006, 71, 9261–9270.
(9) (a) Gung, B. W.; Xue, X.; Reich, H. J. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70,
7232–7237. (b) Gung, B. W.; Xue, X.; Reich, H. J. J. Org. Chem. 2005,
(11) (a) Wallace, D. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1912–1915.
(b) Hoye, T. R.; Jeffrey, C. S.; Tennakoon, M. A.; Wang, J.; Zhao, H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10210–10211.
70, 3641–3644
.
2928
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 14, 2008