many surface silanol residues, and the rotational flexibility
allows for the accommodation of a range of main group and
transition metal elements.
2 proceeds under conventional conditions,11,12 giving tet-
rakis(3-bromo-5-tert-butyl-2-methoxyphenyl)ethene 3 or tet-
rakis(3-bromo-5-tert-butyl-2-hydroxyphenyl)ethene 4, re-
spectively, cleanly and in high yield (Scheme 1). Despite
For applications to catalysis, steric isolation of the binding
sites is essential to directing metal coordination, inhibiting
intermolecular aggregation, and the formation of sandwich
structures lacking surface-like character.5 To this point,
however, the largest substituent that has been successfully
installed adjacent to the hydroxy functionality is the n-propyl
group, which was introduced by a 4-fold Claisen rearrange-
ment of tetrakis(2-allyloxyphenyl)ethene followed by stan-
dard catalytic hydrogenation.1a While this classical procedure
is highly efficient (>80% overall starting from the unsub-
stituted ligand), the introduction of sterically larger ortho-
substituents with equal efficiency represents a substantial
synthetic challenge.6
Scheme 1
In this communication, we report the use of the retro-
Brook rearrangement7 for the simultaneous installation of
four trialkylsilyl or aryldialkylsilyl substituents onto the
tetrakis(2-hydroxphenyl)ethene ligand framework. Under
optimized conditions, this intramolecular 1,3-migration reac-
tion can be conducted on a substantial scale and proceeds in
remarkably high yields. The resulting tetrakis(2-hydroxy-3-
silylphenyl)ethene derivatives have been characterized both
spectroscopically and, for the trimethylsilyl derivative, by
X-ray crystallography.8
Application of the retro-Brook rearrangement to the
tetrakis(2-hydroxphenyl)ethene structural class requires ef-
ficient halogenation ortho to the phenoxy residues. To avoid
issues of regioselectivity,9 the synthesis begins with deriva-
tives bearing 5-tert-butyl substituents in each arene
residue.1a,c These compounds are prepared in high yield on
a multigram scale via the McMurry olefination of bis(5-tert-
butyl-2-methoxyphenyl)methanone.1c,10
the dense functionality, NMR spectroscopic analysis at room
temperature reveals no evidence of restricted rotation in either
system.
The retro-Brook sequence is initiated by exhaustive
O-silylation (Scheme 2). For sterically small silyl derivatives,
Scheme 2
Bromination of either tetrakis(5-tert-butyl-2-methoxyphe-
nyl)ethene 1 or tetrakis(5-tert-butyl-2-hydroxyphenyl)ethene
(5) Verkerk, U. H.; McDonald, R.; Stryker, J. M. Can. J. Chem. 2005,
83, 922–928.
(6) The introduction of tert-butyl substituents to either tetrakis(2-
hydroxyphenyl)ethene or tetrakis(5-tert-butyl-2-hydroxyphenyl)ethene via
Friedel-Crafts alkylation using a range of standard synthetic procedures
invariably produces intractable mixtures of tert-butylated products and
cannot be driven to completion.
(7) (a) Brook, A. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1974, 7, 77–83. (b) Wright, A.;
West, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 3214–3222, and 3227-3232. (c)
Linderman, R. J.; Ghannam, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 2392–2398.
Review: (d) Moser, W. H. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 2065-2084. Phenolic
cases: (e) Simchen, G.; Pfetschinger, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1976,
15, 428–429. (f) Billedeau, R. J.; Sibi, M. P.; Snieckus, V. Teterahedron
Lett. 1983, 24, 4515–4518. (g) Maruoka, K.; Itoh, T.; Araki, Y.; Shirasaka,
T.; Yamamoto, H. Bull. Soc. Chem. Jpn. 1988, 61, 2975–2976. (h) Thadani,
A. N.; Huang, Y.; Rawal, V. H. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3873–3876.
(8) Detailed experimental procedures and complete characterization data
are provided as Supporting Information.
(9) None of the methodologies reported for selective ortho-bromination
of 4-unsubstituted phenols was sufficiently selective for adaptation to this
substrate. See, for example: (a) Posner, G. H.; Canella, K. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1985, 107, 2571–2573. (b) Beak, P.; Brown, R. A. J. Org. Chem. 1977,
42, 1823–1824.
the simple chlorosilane is sufficiently reactive to provide
quantitative conversion. Reactions using the more hindered
silyl derivatives, however, require the use of the correspond-
ing silyl triflate reagents for optimal conversion.13 The
(10) Chung, M.-K.; Stryker, J. M. Inorg. Synth., in press
.
(11) Majetich, G.; Hicks, R.; Reister, S. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 4321–
4326
.
(12) (a) Despite a previous report,12b the bromination of 2 using a Br2/
DMSO reagent was neither clean nor reproducible upon scale-up. In
addition, a procedure reported for the bromination of 1 was not adaptable
(13) (a) BuMe2SiOTf: Corey, E. J.; Cho, H.; Rucker, C.; Hua, D.-H.
t
Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 3455–3458. (b) iPrMe2SiOTf: Olah, G. A.; Laali,
K.; Farooq, O. Organometallics 1984, 3, 1337-1340. (c) Ph2MeSiOTf;
Uhlig, W. J. Organomet. Chem. 1993, 452, 29–32.
to large scale. (b) Verkerk, U. Ph.D Dissertation, 2002
.
3826
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 17, 2008