Angewandte
Chemie
Table 2: The influence of thioaryl substitution on the diastereoselectivity
of the reactionswith 2 and 36.
clearer with this example; no products resulting from reaction
of the vinyl carbenoid with the indole lacking the thioether
unit were isolated.
To determine whether the substituent at C3 of the indole
ring was responsible for the enhanced diastereoselectivity
with 11, we examined the effect of a variety of C3 substituents
on the reaction (Table 1). Whereas 3-tert-butyl-2-thiophenyl-
Table 1: The influence of substitution at C3 on the diastereoselectivity.
Entry
Indole
Ar
Indoline
A/B
Yield
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4-OMeC6H4
4-NO2C6H4
2-OMeC6H4
2-FC6H4
2-MeC6H4
2,6-dimethylphenyl
2-iPrC6H4
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
7:1
7:1
9:1
7:1
11:1
15:1
18:1
86%
74%
74%
81%
75%
96%
91%
Entry
Indole
R
Indoline
A/B
Yield
[a] Ratio of diastereomers determined by the integrations of the allylic
proton peak in the 1H NMR spectra of the crude reaction mixture.
1
2
3
4
5
11
14
15
16
17
3’-indole
Ph
Me
tBu
12
18
19
20
21
10:1[a]
8:1[a]
7:1[a]
76%
80%
75%
91%
88%
15:1[a]
8:1[b]
CH2CH2CO2Et
1
[a] Ratio of diastereomers determined by H NMR spectroscopy of the
crude reaction mixture. [b] Ratio of diastereomers determined by HPLC
analysis of the crude reaction mixture.
indole (16)[22] gave the highest selectivity (Table 1, entry 4),
more subtle structural modifications as exemplified by 14,[23]
15,[24] and 17[25] resulted in little to no change in diastereose-
lectivity (Table 1, entries 2, 3, and 5).
Scheme 4. (E)-Chlorovinyldiazoacetate coupling.
From our perspective the most interesting result from the
studies summarized in Table 1 was that 2-thiophenylethers
showed enhanced selectivity relative to 2-alkylthioethers
(compare Table 1, entry 5 with Scheme 1), implying that
substitution on the thioether group might influence the
reaction. We examined the effect of the substitution on the
thioarene unit to gain more insight (Table 2) into the
reaction.[26] Whereas para substitution resulted in selectivities
that were similar to those obtained with the parent thiophenyl
derivative (compare Table 2, entries 1 and 2 with Table 1,
entry 5), the reaction was significantly enhanced by substitu-
tion ortho to the thioether. The diastereoselectivity increased
to 11:1 with ortho-methyl thioether 26 (Table 2, entry 5) and
to 15:1 with 2,6-dimethylphenyl thioether 27 (Table 2,
entry 6). The highest selectivity in these studies was obtained
with ortho-isopropyl indole 28 giving indoline 35 with 18:1
diasteroselectivity. These results along with the lower selec-
tivities seen with ortho-methoxy and ortho-fluoro thiophenyl
ethers 24 and 25, respectively (Table 2, entries 3 and 4) imply
that steric, and not electronic effects are operative here.[27]
As would be expected for a reaction involving a concerted
rearrangement (cf. 8 to 9, Scheme 2), the reaction is
stereospecific; the reaction of 36 with (E)-vinylchloride 37
gave indoline 38, whose structure is analogous to the minor
isomer from the reaction of 17 with 2, as the major product in
88% yield as an 8:1 ratio of diastereomers (Scheme 4).
We next examined the influence of a chiral RhII complex
([Rh2(tbsp)4]; tbsp = tetrakis{1-[(4-tert-butylphenyl)sulfonyl]-
(2S-pyrrolidinecarboxylate}) on the reaction.[28] Although the
enantioselectivity was low (Table 3),[29] exposure of 2,6-
dimethylphenylthioindole 27 to 2 and [Rh2(tbsp)4] resulted
in an increased diastereoselectivity when compared to the
Table 3: Effect of [Rh2(tbsp)4] on the diastereoselective coupling reac-
tionsof 2 with 2-arylthioindoles.
Entry
Indole
Ar
Indoline
A/B[a]
Yield
1
2
22
27
4-OMeC6H4
2,6-dimethylphenyl
29
34
7:1[b]
94%
91%
>95:5[c]
[a] Ratio of diastereomers determined by integration of the of the allylic
proton in the 1H NMR spectrum of the crude reaction mixture. [b] e.r.=
62:38 asdetermined by chiral HPLC method.s [c] e.r.
determined by chiral HPLC methods.
=56:44 as
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 5374 –5377
ꢀ 2008 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
5375