cally independent molecules with different dihedral angles
(63.6° for molecule A and 71.0° for molecule B). In both
molecules, the methylenequinoid structures are clearly
observed in the central core in Figure 1a, where the C-C
bondlengths of C1-C11* (1.363 Å) and C9-C10 (1.384
Å) are shorter than that of C1-C10 (1.454 Å). The two
substituents at the 7 and 14 positions can effectively interact
with each other in the neutral state. Dione 1 forms a π-staking
structure with interplanar distances of 3.588 Å (molecule A)
and 3.546 Å (molecule B) with a close intermolecular contact
of 2.879 Å between the C atoms of the carbonyl groups and
F atoms of the fluorinated phenyl rings. On the other hand,
dione 2 containing two TIPS groups also has a planar
structure and the central methylenequinoid structure. A one-
dimentional π-stacking structure is observed in the crystal
with interplanar distances of 3.439 and 3.476 Å as shown in
Figure 1d. This stacking structure may be favorable for
transporting electrons.
absorption maxima and molar extinction coefficients in
dichloromethane are summarized in Table 1. The absorption
maximum of dione 1 appears at 578 nm with a large molar
extinction coefficient. These intense absorptions in the visible
region are considered to be due to charge transfer from the
quinoid unit to the carbonyl groups. Introduction of the
thienyl rings brings about red-shifts of the absorption maxima
to 598 nm in 3a and 600 nm in 3b. The TIPS groups in 2
induce a further red-shift of the absorption maximum to 636
nmowingtotheextendedπ-conjugation.TheHOMO-LUMO
energy gaps were estimated from the end-absorptions and
are listed in Table 1. These end-absorptions are somewhat
dependent on solvents, thus in polar solvents broad peaks
were observed with red-shifts (see the Supporting Informa-
tion). On the other hand, they showed red fluorescence,
whose quantum efficiencies in dichloromethane are shown
in Table 1. Among them, dione 1 with orthogonal difluori-
nated phenyl rings showed the highest efficiency (Φ ) 0.45).
The solvent effects on the fluorescence spectra were also
observed. In ethanol, emission peaks were significantly
weakened with red-shifts (see the Supporting Information).
Table 1. Optical Propertiesa of Diones 1-3
dione
λabs (nm (log ε))
λem (nm (Φf))b
λedge (eV)c
1
2
3a
3b
578 (4.84)
636 (4.75)
598 (4.59)
600 (4.65)
632 (0.45)
687 (0.18)
666 (0.01)
d
1.75
1.61
1.61
1.58
a In CH2CI2. b Determined by using rhodamine B (λex ) 535 nm, Φf )
0.97 in EtOH) as standard. c Optical HOMO-LUMO gaps determined from
the end-absorption in CH2CI2. d Very weak.
Table 2. Redox Potentialsa of Diones 1-3
dione
Ered1 (V)
Ered2 (V)
Epa (V)
Figure 2. Absorption spectra of compounds 1-3 in CH2Cl2.
1
2
3a
3b
-0.28
-0.21
-0.31
-0.31
-0.82
-0.73
-0.83
-0.80
+1.40b
+1.24b
+1.32
+1.06
These pentacene-5,12-diones 1-3 exhibited intense ab-
sorptions in the visible region as shown in Figure 2. The
a 0.1 M n-Bu4NPF6 in DMF, Pt electrode, scanning rate 100 mV s-1, V
versus SCE. b Determined from differential pulse voltammogram.
(6) (a) Jones, B. A.; Ahrens, M. J.; Yoon, M.-H.; Facchetti, A.; Marks,
T. J.; Wasielewski, M. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6363–6366.
(b) Babel, A; Jenekhe, S. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13656–13657.
(c) Miyata, Y.; Minari, T.; Nemoto, T.; Isoda, S.; Komatsu, K. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2007, 5, 2592–2598.
These pentacene-5,12-diones 1-3 are expected to show
amphoteric redox properties with low LUMO levels. The
cyclic voltammograms were measured in DMF, and the
redox potentials are summarized in Table 2. All compounds
1-3 showed two clear reversible reduction waves. The first
reduction potential of 1 appeared at -0.27 V, which is
significantly high compared to those of indenofluorenediones
containing two conjugated carbonyl groups (-0.73 V vs
SCE).11 Introduction of the electron-donating thienyl groups
or the acetylene groups did not affect the reduction potentials
(7) (a) Kaur, I.; Jia, W.; Kopreski, R. P.; Selvarasah, S.; Dokmeci, M. R.;
Pramanik, C.; McGruer, N. E.; Miller, G. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130,
16274–16286. (b) Allen, C. F. H.; Bell, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1942, 64,
1253–1260.
(8) (a) Ono, K.; Totani, H.; Hiei, T.; Yoshino, A.; Saito, K.; Eguchi,
K.; Tomura, M.; Nishida, J.; Yamashita, Y. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 9699–
9704. (b) Jang, B.-B.; Lee, S. H.; Kafafi, Z. H. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18,
449–457.
(9) (a) Anthony, J. E.; Brooks, J. S.; Eaton, D. L.; Parkin, S. R. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9482–9483. (b) Anthony, J. E.; Eaton, D. L.; Parkin,
S. R. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 15–18. (c) Lehnherr, D.; Tykwinski, R. R. Org.
Lett. 2007, 9, 4583–4586. (d) Okamoto, T.; Bao, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 10308–10309. (e) Kim, Y.; Whitten, J. E.; Swager, T. M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12122–12130. (f) Be´nard, C. P.; Geng, Z.; Heuft,
M. A.; VanCrey, K.; Fallis, A. G. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 7229–7236.
(10) Miao, Q.; Chi, X.; Xiao, S.; Zeis, R.; Lefenfeld, M.; Siegrist, T.;
Steigerwald, M. L.; Nuckolls, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1340–1345.
(11) (a) Nakagawa, T.; Kumaki, D.; Nishida, J.; Tokito, S.; Yamashita,
Y. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 2615–2617. (b) Zhao, C.; Zhang, Y.; Ng, M.-
K. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 6364–6371.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 8, 2009
1815