2262
N. Chatterjee et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 55 (2014) 2261–2265
reaction using microwave heating, basic alumina as solid support
and base, and aryl imidazol-1-yl-sulfonate as oxygen based
electrophile.
alines, triazolo benzodiazepines, triazolo benzoxazepines, and
triazolo benzothiazines involving various azido alkynes (2a–f)
and aryl imidazol-1-yl-sulfonate as oxygenated electrophilic com-
pounds (3a–e) with basic alumina as a solid support using only
Cu(phen)(PPh3)Br (1h) as a catalyst under microwave irradiation
(100 °C, 250 W). In all cases the products were obtained in high
yield. The use of solid support serves dual role; it eliminates the
use of hazardous and costly Pd-catalyst and also restricts the use
of organic solvents. The new protocol does not require additional
base and can be carried out efficiently in a short time.
We used 2a and 3a to synthesize triazole fused benzoxazine 4a
for the initial studies. Our first objective was to develop the opti-
mal condition for the one-pot reaction under solid support without
using Pd salts. Systematic studies of the reaction conditions in the
presence of copper(I) catalysts23b,26 (Fig. 1) and various solid sup-
ports (basic alumina, TiO2, MgO) revealed that basic alumina pro-
vided better yield (Table 1), even in the absence of any added
base (triethyl amine or DBU). Copper(I) iodide or bromide (1a–b),
yielded [1,2,3]triazolo[5,1-c][1,4]benzoxazines (4a) in 61% and
58%, respectively, (Table 1, entry 5 & 6), whereas, the use of cata-
lysts 1c and 1d gave yields of 54% and 57% (Table 1, entry 7 & 8).
Similar observations were noted for thio-copper complexes (1e–
g) (Table 1, entry 9–11). Use of catalyst 1h was found to be very
effective for the reaction with an excellent yield of 77% (Table 1,
entry 12). No additional base was required as basic alumina acts
as base and also as solid support.
To evaluate the effect of microwave irradiation in comparison
with conventional reaction conditions, a pre-heated oil-bath was
used as heat source. Reaction in an oil bath of the same reactants
2a, 3a, and catalyst 1h gave 4a in significantly lower yield (60%).
This clearly indicates that the effect of microwave is not purely
thermal. It could be expected that the application of microwave
irradiation causes easy excitation of electronic energy levels and
thus leads to better yield.
To establish the scope and generality of this approach, reaction
of various aryl imidazol-1-yl-sulfonates (3a–e) was carried out fol-
lowing the same reaction condition. The results are summarized in
Table 2. It was observed that a wide variety of aryl imidazol-1-yl-
sulfonates possessing different functional groups reacted success-
fully. All the products were characterized by spectral and analytical
methods. To ensure the recyclability of the solid support, the resi-
due was washed thoroughly with acetone and water, calcined at
Microwave heating at controlled temperature and pressure may
considerably reduce reaction time without promoting any side
reactions.23 Solid support like alumina, possesses excellent ability
to absorb the organic compounds on their surface, and transmits
microwave irradiation without absorbing or restricting it. Litera-
ture also revealed that the basic oxides, like alumina, serve as a
suitable alternative for palladium catalyzed heteroannulation reac-
tions due to its role as a base and the presence of oxide ion in the
solid framework.24 Oxygen based electrophiles25a,25b have also at-
tracted attention of the synthetic organic chemists, due to their
high stability and easy accessibility through functional group inter-
conversion from readily available hydroxylated compounds. These
prompted us to explore an efficient yet simple and one-pot green
protocol using basic alumina and microwave irradiation with aryl
imidazol-1-yl-sulfonate as electrophile. Herein, we describe
(Scheme 1) the synthesis of triazolo benzoxazines, triazolo quinox-
X
X
Ar-OSO2Imidazol-1-yl (3a-e)
N3
Basicalumina, Cu(phen)(PPh3)Br
M.W, 15-20min, 100°C
N
Ar
N
N
2a X = O, 2b X = COO
2c X = NAc, 2d X = NPh
2e X = S, 2f X = CONH
4a-j
Scheme 1. One-pot reaction under microwave irradiation using basic alumina as
solid support.
Cu-X
[Cu(MeCN)2(PPh3)2]Cl [Cu(CH3CN)4]PF6
1c
1d
N
Cu
S
1a X=I
1b X=Br
1e
N
N
N
N
Cu
Cu
S
S
Cu
Ph3P
Br
1f
1g
1h
Figure 1. Copper catalysts used in the study.
Table 1
Optimization of Cu(I) catalysts on various solid supports and bases
Entrya
Solid support
Catalyst used
Catalyst (mol %)
Time (min)
Yieldb (%)
A. Without additional base
1
2
3
4
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
TiO2
TiO2
TiO2
TiO2
1a
1a
1a
1a
1a
1a
1b
1c
1d
1e
1f
2.0
2.5
2.5
3.0
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
10
10
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
27
30
30
30
36
61
58
54
57
54
48
57
77
MgO
Basic alumina
Basic alumina
Basic alumina
Basic alumina
Basic alumina
Basic alumina
Basic alumina
Basic alumina
1g
1h
B. With Et3N as additional base
13
Basic alumina
1h
1h
2.5
2.5
15
15
77
75
C. With DBU as additional base
14
Basic alumina
a
All reactions were performed using 1-azido-2-(prop-2-ynyloxy)benzene (2a, 1 equiv) and arylimidazol-1-yl-sulfonate (3a, 1.2 equiv), with copper catalysts (1a–h) under
microwave irradiation (250 W, 100 °C).
b
Isolation of pure product, 4a.