4466
K. Papi Reddy et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 4463–4466
Table 2 (continued)
Test sample
Food intake (g)
TG (mM)
CHO (mM)
8.25 2.9
HDL–C (mM)
GLU (mM)
GLY (mM)
0.94 0.24
H/C
7.34
+8
7.31 2.19
2.72 1.64
+5
89.73 23.1
+2
0.33
+57
N
***
*
*
À40
À24
À30
4
50 mg/kg
6.52
À4
14.66 5.9
+20
9.40 2.59
À25
2.47 1.70
À5
91.52 19.91
+4
1.25 0.21
À8
0.26
+24
MeO
12
50 mg/kg
N
13
7.51
+11
11.35 6.85
À7
9.10 4.01
À27
1.82 1.38
À30
81.22 15.02
À8
1.08 0.38
À20
0.20
À5
50 mg/kg
Fenofibrate 108 mg/kg (Fig. 1)
—
À42
*
À18
NC
—
À36**
+10
P <0.05 ( ), P <0.01 (**), P <0.001 (***); NC = no change.
*
3 lowered the blood glucose levels to À17.8%, À14.8% at 5 h and
À19.6%, À21.1% at 24 h, respectively. The five-membered furan
and thiophene ester derivatives 9, 10 and 11 were also lowered
the blood glucose levels to À15.8%, À12.5%, À16.9% at 5 h and
À18.5%, À14.9%, À21.5% at 24 h, respectively. The reference drug
metformin lowered the blood glucose levels À23.5% at 5 h and
À26.5% at 24 h in the same model (Table 1).
derivative 4 turned out to be dual-acting (antihyperglycemic
and antidyslipidemic activity) agent in our studies. Further work
is in progress to find out the mechanism of action of 4 in dyslip-
idemic activity.
Acknowledgments
Activity guided fractionation and isolation work on A. marmelos
led to identify the dyslipidemic activity in lupeol (1). Lupeol (1)
lowered the triglyceride by 26%, cholesterol by 9%, glycerol by
10%, free fatty acids by 23% and increased the HDL–cholesterol
by 44% (P <0.001) and the HDL/cholesterol ratio was 63% in ham-
ster model at 100 mg/kg body weight.10 Five novel ester deriva-
tives of lupeol (2–4, 12 and 13) were screened for their
antidylipidemic activity in the same model at a dose of 50 mg/kg
body weight. Nicotinic acid derivative 4 showed better lipid lower-
ing profile than other derivatives. It significantly lowered 40% (P
<0.001) in triglycerides, 30% (P <0.05) in glycerol, 24% (P <0.05)
in cholesterol quantity. It also improved the HDL–cholesterol by
5%. It is also noteworthy to mention here that 4 also exhibited good
Authors are grateful to the Director, Central Drug Research
Institute (CDRI), Lucknow, India for constant encouragement for
the drug development program on antihyperglycemic and antidy-
slipdemic agents, J. P. Chaturvedi for technical support and the
Sophisticated Analytical Instrumentation Facility (SAIF) of CDRI
for spectral data.
Supplementary data
The spectral data (1H, 13C NMR, ES and FAB Mass), experimental
procedure of novel synthetic derivatives and experimental proce-
dure of biological activity of lupeol are available. Supplementary
data associated with this article can be found, in the online version,
antihyperglycemic activity. p-Nitrobenzoic acid derivative
3
showed good lowering in triglycerides (20%), cholesterol (34%),
glycerol (21%), however 3 also lowered the HDL–cholesterol, which
is undesired side effect in dyslipidimia treatment. Compound 2, 12
and 13 showed good cholesterol lowering property; mild effect in
lowering triglycerides, but these derivatives also possesses unde-
sired effect (HDL–C lowering). The reference drug fenofibrate low-
ered the triglycerides 42%, cholesterol 18% and glycerol 36% at a
dose of 108 mg/kg body weight in the same model (Table 2). There
is increasing evidence that hepatic insulin resistance is associated
with an increased production of free fatty acid and hypertriglycer-
idemia. The circulating triglycerides and free fatty acid are com-
monly elevated in obese and diabetic subjects and lower the
ability of insulin to suppress hepatic glucose production by activat-
ing gluconeogenesis yet inhibiting glycolysis.11 Reduction in the
circulating triglycerides and other fatty acid by ester derivative
such as 4 in our studies might be playing a major role to improve
the hyperglycaemia and strengthen the insulin response.
References and notes
1. King, H.; Rewers, M. Diabetes care 1993, 16, 157.
2. McCarthy, D.; Zimmet, P. Diabetes 1994–2010 Global Estimates and Projections;
International Diabetes Institute: Melbourne, 1994.
3. Bennett, P. H. Diabet. Metab. Rev. 1997, 13, 583.
4. Ferrannini, E.; Haffner, S. M.; Mitchell, B. D.; Stern, M. P. Diabetologia 1991, 34,
416.
5. Eghdamian, E.; Ghosh, K. Drugs Today 1998, 34, 943.
6. Bloom, J. D.; Dutia, M. D.; Johnson, B. D.; Wissner, A.; Burns, M. G.; Largis, E. E.;
Dolan, J. A.; Claus, T. H. J. Med. Chem. 1992, 35, 3081.
7. Kirtikar, B. D.; Basu, K. R. Indian Medicinal Plants Part-I, Indian Press: Allahabad,
plate no. 201, 1918 reprinted 1995.
8. Sudhahar, V.; Kumar, S. A.; Varalakshmi, P. Life Sci. 2006, 78, 1329.
9. Sudhahar, V.; Kumar, S. A.; Mythili, Y.; Varalakshmi, P. Nutr. Res. 2007, 27,
778.
10. Narender, T.; Shweta, S.; Tiwari, P.; Reddy, K. P.; Khaliq, T.; Prathipati, P.; Puri,
A.; Srivastava, A. K.; Chander, R.; Agarwal, S. C.; Raja, K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2007, 17, 1808.
11. Hawkins, M.; Tonelli, J.; Kishore, P.; Stein, D.; Ragucci, E.; Gitig, A.; Reddy, K.
Diabetes 2003, 52, 2748.
In conclusion ester derivatives of abundantly available lupeol
(1) was prepared and screened for their in vivo antihyperglycemic
activity and also antidyslipidemic activity. Nicotinic acid