pubs.acs.org/joc
SCHEME 1. Endo’s [3,3]-Sigmatropic Rearrangement of
A Mild Method for the Efficient [3,3]-Sigmatropic
Rearrangement of N,O-Diacylhydroxylamines
N,O-Diacylhydroxylamines3
Helen Rachel Lagiakos,† Marie-Isabel Aguilar,‡ and
Patrick Perlmutter*,†
Monash University, Clayton,
Victoria, 3800, Australia, and Department of Biochemistry &
Molecular Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria,
3800, Australia. †School of Chemistry. ‡Department of
Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
SCHEME 2. Alternative [3,3]-Sigmatropic Rearrangement
of N,O-Diacylhydroxylamines5
Received August 7, 2009
enolization of 3 generates the corresponding enol and/or
enolate which then rearranges to give R-acyloxy products 4.
These products can easily be hydrolyzed to give synthetically
useful 2-hydroxyamides and acids.6 Since that report, Clark
has published a series of studies, exploring the use of
different bases in order to improve the generality of the
process.7 Two main issues with regard to substrate structure
were noted by this group. The first involved the acidity of the
R protons required to undergo enolization. It was found that
only activated systems (i.e., allylic and benzylic) would
undergo rearrangement.
In order to overcome this problem, a catalytic method
based on the use of highly basic phosphazenes in refluxing
toluene for extended periods of time was developed. Under
these conditions, even unactivated systems rearranged.
However, with such unactivated substrates, the steric nature
of the N-alkyl substituent played a significant role in pro-
moting or hindering the rearrangement. Thus, it was ob-
served that as the substituent decreased in steric demand so
did the yield. Whereas N-tert-butyl-containing substrates
gave good yields after rearrangement, N-sec-butyl and
N-isopropyl gave modest yields and N-methyl failed to react
at all.
We were interested in establishing whether milder condi-
tions than those previously described could be developed for
this class of rearrangements. We did this with a view toward
expanding the scope of the rearrangement to include as wide
a range of substrates as possible.
The rearrangement of N,O-diacylhydroxylamines em-
ploying varying ratios of a mild base, Et3N, and TMSOTf
as silylating agent was examined first (Scheme 3). These
conditions are similar to those reported by Miller’s group
for the rearrangement of N,N0-diacylhydrazides8 and
A mild, general method for the [3,3]-sigmatropic rear-
rangement of N,O-diacylhydroxylamines, employing a
combination of mild base and Lewis acid, is described.
Employing stoichiometric amounts of reagents with
respect to substrate provides R-acyloxyamides, whereas
an excess of reagents favors formation of cyclic ortho-
amides.
The [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangement1,2 of N,O-diacylhy-
droxylamines (e.g., 1, Scheme 1) was first reported by Endo
in 1994.3 Under their reported conditions, the dienolate was
generated at low temperature which then rearranged to give
products 2 in modest to good yields.
Several years later, Clark’s group reported that under
forcing thermal conditions4 or employing an organic base,5
an alternative rearrangement can occur as shown in
Scheme 2. Thus, under Clark’s conditions, selective amide
(1) For general reviews on [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangements: (a) Enders,
D; Knopp, M; Schiffers, R. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1996, 7 (7), 1847–1882.
(b) Nowicki, J. Molecules 2000, 5, 1033–1050. (c) Allin, S. M.; Baird, R. D.
Curr. Org. Chem. 2001, 5, 395–415. (d) Nubbemeyer, U. Synthesis 2003, 7,
961–1008.
(2) For general reviews on hetero-[3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangements, see:
(a) Blechert, S. Synthesis 1989, 71–82. (b) Ziegler, F. E. Chem. Rev. 1988, 88,
1423–1452. (c) Overman, L. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1984, 23, 579–
586.
(3) (a) Endo, Y.; Uchida, T.; Hizatate, S.; Shudo, K. Synthesis 1994,
1096–1105. (b) Uchida, T.; Endo, Y.; Hizatate, S.; Shudo, K. Chem. Pharm.
Bull. 1994, 42 (2), 419–421. For Endo’s previous anionic [3,3]-sigmatropic
rearrangements of either O- or N-acylhydroxylamines, see: (c) Endo, Y.;
Hizatate, S.; Shudo, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32 (24), 2803–2806. (d) Endo,
Y.; Hizatate, S.; Shudo, K. Synlett 1991, 9, 649–650.
(6) There are few synthetic methods available for the synthesis of 2-
hydroxyamides; see: (a) Seebach, D; Scheiss, M. Helv. Chim. Acta 1983, 66,
1618–1623. (b) Hoffman, R. V.; Nayyar, N. K.; Chen, W. J. Org. Chem. 1992,
57, 5700–5707.
(7) Clark, A. J.; Al-Faiyaz, Y. S. S.; Patel, D.; Broadhurst, M. J.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 2007–2009.
(8) Miller, S. J.; Bayne, C. D. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 5680–5681.
(4) Al-Faiyaz, Y. S. S.; Clark, A. J.; Filik, R. P.; Peacock, J. L.; Thomas,
G. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 1269–1272.
(5) Clark, A. J.; Al-Faiyaz, Y. S. S.; Broadhurst, M. J.; Patel, D.; Peacock,
J. L. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1. 2000, 1117–1127.
DOI: 10.1021/jo901717a
r
Published on Web 09/15/2009
J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 8001–8003 8001
2009 American Chemical Society