J. Truong et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 921–923
923
at the ketene carbonyl rather than at the terminal allylic carbon of
the vinylketene. Reductive elimination to form a cyclohexadie-
none, followed by tautomerization provides the catechol.
associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at
In an attempt to understand the regioselectivity of the products,
ab initio calculations are performed for various alkynes and some
of the products. The Löwdin population analysis on the chloro-
alkyne at the various levels of the theory shows the general trend
for the alkyne carbon connected to R2 is electron-rich or electron-
deficient in accordance with the electronegativity difference be-
tween chlorine and the R2 group. Therefore, the product distribu-
tion in Table 1 cannot be understood by the alkyne electronic
structure. The thermodynamic stability of the products alone does
not explain the product distribution, either. As shown in Table 1,
using the MP2/6-31G(d,p) level of theory including the zero-point
energy from the RHF/6-31G(d,p) level, R2 = H, cyclo-Pr, and Ph
substituted model products are nearly isoenergetic. In the case of
R2 = SiMe3, 4h is more stable than 3h by 3.5 kcal/mol. The largest
difference among the calculated products is R2 = COOH, and 3i is
6 kcal/mol more stable than 4i. The major products of the latter
two substitutions are in fact opposite of what thermodynamic sta-
bility of the products should be. From these considerations, it is
likely that steric factors in the formation of reactive intermediates
play a more important role in the formation of the observed prod-
ucts. Hence the ketene-alkyne adduct geometry must be important
in determining the product distribution, and we are currently
investigating this aspect computationally. We are actively probing
the electronic and steric parameters that influence the
regioselectivity.
References and notes
1. An entire issue of Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 757–968 focuses on the use of
benzannulation and cycloaddition reactions to form aromatic rings.
2. For a comprehensive review of ketene chemistry see: Tidwell, T. T. Ketenes;
Wiley: New York, 1995.
3. Trahanovsky, W. S.; Surber, B. W.; Wilkes, M. C.; Preckel, M. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1982, 104, 6779–6781. and references cited therein.
4. Corey, E. J.; Kozikowski, A. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1975, 16, 2389–2392.
5. (a) Loebach, J. L.; Bennett, D. M.; Danheiser, R. L. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 8380–
8389; (b) Danheiser, R. L.; Sard, H. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 4810–4812.
6. (a) Moore, H. W.; Decker, O. H. W. Chem. Rev. 1986, 86, 821–830; (b) Sun, L.;
Danheiser, R. L.; Brisbois, R. G.; Kowalczyk, J. J.; Miller, R. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1990, 112, 3093–3100; (c) Liebeskind, L. S. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 8194–
8203.
7. Austin, W. F.; Zhang, Y.; Danheiser, R. L. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3905–3908.
8. For a comprehensive review of the Dötz benzannulation see: Waters, M. L.;
Wulff, W. D. Org. React. 2008, 70, 121–623; And for a general updated review
see: Dötz, K. H.; Stendal, J., Jr. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 3227–3274.
9. (a) Merlic, C. A.; Aldrich, C. C.; Albaneze-Walker, J.; Saghatelian, A.; Mammen, J.
J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 1297–1309; (b) Merlic, C.; Xu, D.; Gladstone, B. G. J. Org.
Chem. 1993, 58, 538–545; (c) Rawat, M.; Wulff, W. D. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 329–
332.
10. Anderson, B. A.; Wulff, W. D.; Rheingold, A. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 8615–
8617.
11. (a) Huffman, M. A.; Liebeskind, L. S.; Pennington, W. T. Organometallics 1992,
11, 255–266; (b) Huffman, M. A.; Liebeskind, L. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112,
8617–8618.
12. Huffman, M. A.; Liebeskind, L. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 2771–2772.
13. Kondo, T.; Niimi, M.; Nomura, M.; Wada, K.; Mitsudo, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007,
48, 2837–2839.
14. For a comprehensive review of vinylketene complexes see: Gibson, S. E.;
Peplow, M. A. Adv. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 44, 275–353.
15. For recent reviews of iron chemistry in organic synthesis see: Sherry, B. D.;
Fürstner, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1500–1511; Bolm, C.; Legros, J.; Le Paih, J.;
Zani, L. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 6217–6254.
Acknowledgments
16. Alcock, N. W.; Richards, C. J.; Thomas, S. E. Organometallics 1991, 10, 231–238.
17. Morris, K. G.; Saberi, S. P.; Thomas, S. E. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1993,
209–211.
18. Saberi, S. P.; Salter, M. M.; Slawin, A. M. Z.; Thomas, S. E.; Williams, D. J. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1994, 167–171.
19. Akhani, R. K.; Rehman, A.; Schnatter, W. F. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 930–
932; Darbasie, N. D.; Schnatter, W. F. K.; Warner, K. F.; Manolache, N.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 963–966.
20. (a) Villeneuve, K.; Ridell, N.; Jordan, R. W.; Tsui, G. C.; Tam, W. Org. Lett. 2004, 6,
4543–4546; Allan, A.; Villenueve, K.; Cockburn, N.; Fatila, E.; Riddell, N.; Tam,
W. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 4178–4192; (b) Yoo, W.-J.; Allen, A.; Villeneuve, K.;
Tam, W. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 5853–5856.
We acknowledge financial support through an Intramural Re-
search grant to N.M. and W.F.K.S., and a grant to W.F.K.S. from
the NIH (SC2GM082276). The NSF provided funds for the purchase
of a GC–MS (CHE-0840432). We also thank the Department of
Chemistry and Biochemistry of Rutgers University, Newark for ac-
cess to instrumentation. We thank Mr. William. A. Helwig, Mr. Ru-
hul Q. Chowdhury, Ms. Kerry McKenzie, Mr. Dean Aquino, and Ms.
Jeunesse Lewis (Harlem Childrens Society intern) for assistance.
21. Diphenylketene–alkyne Ir(I) complexes have been shown to undergo
cyclization to form iridabenzopyrans: Lo, H. C.; Grotjahn, D. B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 2958–2959.
Supplementary data
22. Benyunes, S. A.; Gibson (née Thomas), S. E.; Peplow, M. A. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 1997, 8, 1535–1538. and references cited therein.
Supplementary data (detailed experimental procedures, spec-
troscopic data, NMR spectra, and details of ab initio calculations)