To initiate our investigations, we synthesized a range of
P-containing ene-diynes 3a-f designed to yield a single
regioisomer upon RCM. On the basis of careful mechanistic
work by Lloyd-Jones and co-workers providing evidence for
an “ene-then-yne” pathway for the Ru-catalyzed ring-closing
metathesis of enynes,11 we anticipated that initiation would
occur on the monosubstituted alkene of 3a-f, followed by
cyclization onto one of the two diastereotopic alkynes to afford
the desired desymmetrized P-stereogenic heterocycles. The ene-
diynes 3a-f were prepared via monoaddition of various chiral
unsaturated alcohols to phosphorus oxychloride followed by
double addition of either propynyl magnesium bromide or
trimethylsilylethynyl lithium. This concise synthetic route
allowed for facile diversification of both the ene and diyne
fragments (Table 1). In all cases, the desired dichlorophosphi-
Figure 1. P-Stereogenic ligand with alkynyl groups.
closing metathesis (DSRCM) as a strategically valuable route
to P-stereogenic3c compounds featuring an exocyclic alkynyl
group (Scheme 1). We opted for a catalytic diastereoselective
Table 1. Synthesis of P-Containing Ene-Diynes 3a-f
Scheme 1. Metathesis Approach to P-Stereogenic Compounds
with Alkynyl Groups: Diastereoselective Ene-Diyne Metathesis
entry R′
n
R
product yield (%)a product yield (%)b
desymmetrization process of ene-diynic P-templates bearing
two diastereotopic alkynyl substituents and a secondary
alkoxy group that will serve as stereoinductor. The substrates
selected for this investigation were designed to undergo 1,3-
stereocontrolled ring closure. The products resulting from
enyne metathesis are structurally novel P-stereogenic het-
erocycles bearing the desired exocyclic alkynyl group and a
dienic fragment amenable to rich functionalization. Herein
we report the first example of catalytic diastereoselective ene-
diyne metathesis leading to the formation of various chiral
P-stereogenic heterocycles. Diastereoselective enyne me-
tathesis reactions are scarce in the literature10 and have not
been investigated as a strategy to induce carbon or hetero-
atom stereogenicity. We also demonstrate with two repre-
sentative transformations that the primary product of me-
tathesis can be further manipulated.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Me
Et
Bn
Me
Me
Me
1
1
1
2
2
1
H
H
H
H
Me
Me
2a
2b
2c
2d
2d
2a
72
66
46
46
46
72
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
56
47
42
55
65
83
a Crude yield after workup. b Isolated yield after purification by silica
gel column chromatography.
nate intermediates 2a-d were obtained in sufficient purity to
be engaged directly in the next step. Pleasingly, the addition of
the alkynyl groups led successfully to the desired ene-diynes
3a-f with overall chemical yields ranging from 42 to 83%.
We investigated next the feasibility of the suggested
diastereoselective metathesis approach to access alkynyl-
substituted P-stereogenic heterocycles. Our initial studies
began with ene-diyne 3a prepared from 1-methylbut-3-enol
and possessing two terminal ethynyl groups (Table 2). When
the reaction was performed using 2 mol % of the Grubbs
catalyst II in DCM at reflux, the desired product 4a was
formed, albeit in low conversion and very modest diaste-
reoselectivity (entry 1). An attempt to increase conversion
(7) (a) Join, B.; Mimeau, D.; Delacroix, O.; Gaumont, A.-C. Chem.
Commun. 2006, 3249. (b) Glueck, D. S. Chem.sEur. J. 2008, 14, 7108.
(c) Brunker, T. J.; Anderson, B. J.; Blank, N. F.; Glueck, D. S.; Rheingold,
A. L. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1109. (d) Scriban, C.; Glueck, D. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 2788. (e) Moncarz, J. R.; Laritcheva, N. F.; Glueck, D. S.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 13356. (f) Blank, N. F.; Moncarz, J. R.;
Brunker, T. J.; Scriban, C.; Anderson, B. J.; Amir, O.; Glueck, D. S.;
Zakharov, L. N.; Golen, J. A.; Incarvito, C. D.; Rheingold, A. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6847. (g) Blank, N. F.; McBroom, K. C.; Glueck,
D. S.; Kassel, W. S.; Rheingold, A. L. Organometallics 2006, 25, 1742.
(h) Anderson, B. J.; Glueck, D. S.; DiPasquale, A. G.; Rheingold, A. L.
Organometallics 2008, 27, 4992. (i) Chan, V. S.; Stewart, I. C.; Bergman,
R. G.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2786. (j) Chan, V. S.;
Bergman, R. G.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 15122. (k)
Genet, C.; Canipa Steven, J.; O’Brien, P.; Taylor, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 9336. (l) Gammon, J. J.; Canipa, S. J.; O’Brien, P.; Kelly, B.;
Taylor, S. Chem. Commun. 2008, 3750. (m) Nishida, G.; Noguchi, K.;
Hirano, M.; Tanaka, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3410.
(9) (a) Timmer, M. S. M.; Ovaa, H.; Filippov, D. V.; van der Marel,
G. A.; van Boom, J. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 8231. (b) Schuman,
M.; Trevitt, M.; Redd, A.; Gouverneur, V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000,
39, 2491. (c) Slinn, C. A.; Redgrave, A. J.; Hind, S. L.; Edlin, C.; Nolan,
S. P.; Gouverneur, V. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 3820. (d) Bisaro, F.;
Gouverneur, V. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 2395. (e) Dunne, K. S.; Bisaro, F.;
Odell, B.; Paris, J.-M.; Gouverneur, V. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 10803. (f)
McReynolds, M. D.; Dougherty, J. M.; Hanson, P. R. Chem. ReV. 2004,
104, 2239. (g) Harvey, J. S.; Malcolmson, S. J.; Dunne, K. S.; Meek, S. J.;
Thompson, A. L.; Schrock, R. R.; Hoveyda, A. H.; Gouverneur, V. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 762.
(8) Imamoto, T.; Saitoh, Y.; Koide, A.; Ogura, T.; Yoshida, K. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8636.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 6, 2010
1237