Table 1. Optimization of the I2-Promoted CꢀN Bond Formation
of 1-Methylindole with Pyrazolea
entry
solvent
H2O/dioxane (1:1)
yield (3a/5/6/1a, %)b
1c
2
3
4
5
6
30/32/0/0
96/2/1/0
sat. aq NH4OOCH/dioxane (1:1)
sat. aq NaOOCH/dioxane (1:1)
sat. aq NH4Cl/dioxane (1:1)
sat. aq NH4OAc/dioxane (1:1)
NaOAcꢀHOAc buffer (pH 5.5)d/
dioxane (1:1)
90/2/5/0
Figure 1. Structure of compounds I, II, celogentin C (X = Pro,
Y = bond) and moroidin (X = bond, Y = Gly).
45/50/0/0
15/0/65/15
47/0/50/0
from indole derivatives with an electron-withdrawing group
at the C3 position.10 And recently, Poirier and Beaulieu
reported a general method of a thermal or microwave-
mediated reaction of haloindoles with azoles to afford novel
2-(azol-1-yl)indoles.11 Since some of the haloindoles are not
readily accessible and some are not stable, exploring new
methods of direct CꢀH amination of nonactivated indoles
with azoles is highly desirable, even though an intramo-
lecular oxidative coupling method has been applied in the
total synthesis to build up the 2-(imidazole-1-yl)indole
core.12
7
sat. aq NH4OOCH/CH3CN (1:1)
sat. aq NH4OOCH/THF (1:1)
sat. aq NH4OOCH/DMF (1:1)
sat. aq NH4OOCH/DMSO (1:1)
sat. aq NH4OOCH/CH3OH (1:1)
sat. aq NH4OOCH/sulfolane (1:1)
sat. aq NH4OOCH/dioxane (1:1)
95/2/2/0
8
72/2/1/24
74/2/2/20
76/2/10/10
62/2/10/25
52/0/23/23
80/1/1/16
9
10
11
12
13e
a Reaction conditions: 1a (0.5 mmol), 2a (1.25 mmol), I2 (1.0 mmol),
solvent (sat. aq NH4OOCH/dioxane (1:1), 0.6 mL), rt, 24 h. b Yield
based on 1H NMR using CH3NO2 as an internal standard. c With some
other unidentified compounds. d Prepared from saturated aqueous
NaOAc solution (250 μL) and HOAc (50 μL). e I2 (0.75 mmol, 1.5 equiv).
In recent years, organic reactions in aqueous media have
attracted a great deal of attention, because of environ-
mental concerns and the unique reactivity and selectivity
observed in aqueous reactions.13 In connection with our
interests inaqueousmedium reactions,14 herein wereport a
metal-free selective CꢀN bond formation of inactive
indoles with azoles in aqueous media.
presence of 2.0 equiv of iodine (I2) in H2O/dioxane (1:1) at
room temperature. After 24 h, the desired product 3a was
obtained in 30% yield, and a 32% yield of 1-methyl-1,3-
dihydro-indol-2-one (5) was observed (Table 1, entry 1).
Optimization studies were then performed to improve the
yield of the desired product. When water was replaced with
a saturated NH4OOCH solution, the yield was signifi-
cantly increased to 96% (Table 1, entry 2), and a saturated
NaOOCH solution gave a slightly lower yield of 90%
(Table 1, entry 3). However, a saturated NH4Cl and a
saturated NH4OAc solution led to drastic reductions in
yields (Table 1, entries 4 and 5). Studies on the influence of
different organic cosolvents showed that CH3CN gave an
almost identical yield with dioxane (Table 1, entry 7), but
other solvents such as THF, DMF, DMSO, CH3OH, and
sulfolane were inferior to dioxane (Table 1, entries 8ꢀ12).
Furthermore, an attempt to reduce the iodine loading
showed that lowering the amount of I2 to 1.5 equiv
decreased the yield sharply (Table 1, entry 13). Hence,
our optimized reaction conditions are illustrated in entry 2,
Table 1.
Initial studies were performed with the reaction of
1-methylindole (1a) with 2.5 equiv of pyrazole (2a) in the
(10) For examples, see: (a) Somei, M.; Tanimoto, A.; Orita, H.;
Yamada, F.; Ohta, T. Heterocycles 2001, 54, 425. (b) Yamada, K.;
Yamada, F.; Shiraishi, T.; Tomioka, S.; Somei, M. Heterocycles 2009,
77, 971. (c) Benkli, K.; Demirayak, S.; Gundogdu-Karaburun, N.;
Kiraz, N.; Iscan, G.; Ucucu, U. Indian J. Chem. 2004, 43B, 174. (d)
Comber, M. F.; Moody, C. J. Synthesis 1992, 731. (e) Harrison, J. R.;
Moody, C. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 5189.
(11) Poirier, M.; Goudreau, S.; Poulin, J.; Savoie, J.; Beaulieu, P. L.
Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2334.
(12) (a) He, L.; Yang, L.; Castle, S. L. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1165. (b)
Ma, B.; Litvinov, D. N.; He, L.; Banerjee, B.; Castle, S. L. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6104. (c) Ma, B.; Banerjee, B.; Litvinov, D. N.; He, L.;
Castle, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 1159. (d) Feng, Y.; Chen, G.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 958. (e) Hu, W.; Zhang, F.; Xu, Z.; Liu,
Q.; Cui, Y.; Jia, Y. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 956.
(13) For reviews, see: (a) Li, C.-J. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 3095. (b)
Loh, T. P. In Science of Synthesis; Yamamoto, H., Ed.; Georg Thieme
€
Verlag: New York, 2004; p 413. (c) Lindstrom, U. M. Chem. Rev. 2002,
102, 2751. (d) Li, C.-J. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 533. (e) Li, C.-J. Chem.
Rev. 1993, 93, 2023.
Next, a wide variety of indole derivatives were examined
to react with pyrazole under the optimized conditions, and
the results are summarized in Scheme 1. It showed that free
indoles afforded comparable yields with 1-methylindoles.
The new method revealed a tolerance toward functional
groups for both 1-methylindole derivatives and indole
(14) (a) Huang, J.; Zhou, L.; Jiang, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006,
45, 1945. (b) Huang, J.-M.; Dong, Y. Chem. Commun. 2009, 3943. (c)
Huang, J.-M.; Ren, H.-R. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 2286. (d) Huang,
J.-M.; Dong, Y.; Wang, X.-X.; Luo, H.-C. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 1035.
(e) Huang, J.-M.; Wang, X.-X.; Dong, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50,
924. (f) Huang, J.-M.; Lin, Z.-Q.; Chen, D.-S. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 22.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX