of a commercially available or readily synthesized8 enan-
tioenriched propargylic alcohol.
phosphinates to form allenyl phosphorus species (Figure 1).13
Indeed, in initial studies conducted with propargyl alcohol
as the substrate, trivalent phosphorus esters with either
hydrocarbon or amine substituents (Table 1, entries 1 and
Although [3,3]-rearrangements have proven useful for the
preparation of allenes,9 the application to allenamides has
garnered little attention.10 The most extensively studied
example is the Overman rearrangement of propargylic
trichloroacetimidates to form allenamides, which proceeded
in low yields (10-20%) and with limited substrate scope.10a,b
We hypothesized that a propargylic phosphorimidate would
be a good candidate for a [3,3]-rearrangement as the resulting
allenamide would be fully protected. This would provide a
more stable allenyl species, as well as allowing for the
possibility of unmasking an amine after carrying out further
reactions.7,11
Table 1. Optimization of the Rearrangement
In keeping with earlier reports,7,11 the key phosphorimidate
intermidate would be generated by combination of a prop-
argylic alcohol with a chlorophosphite to yield a phosphorus
ester that would be oxidized with an azide via a Staudinger
reduction. The resulting phosphorimidate could then undergo
the desired rearrangement under transition-metal-catalyzed
conditions (Figure 1). We expected, on the basis of similar
a Conditions: (1) propargylic alcohol (1.6 equiv), 1.3 equiv of R2PCl,
and 1.3 equiv of Et3N in Et2O, 0 °C, 20 min; (2) Cbz azide (1.0 equiv), rt,
2 h. b Phosphorimidate (1.0 equiv), PdCl2(CH3CN)2 (3 mol %), solvent to
a final concentration of 0.01 M. c Phosphorimidate species not formed as a
result of rearrangement to allenyl phosphorus species. d Isolated yields.
e NMR yields.
2) rapidly converted to the corresponding allenyl phosphi-
nates. Phosphites, however, could be converted to the desired
phosphorimidate through reaction with an electron-deficient
azide, such as Cbz-azide, and isolated for use in the
rearrangement.
Once conditions for formation of the propargylic phos-
phorimidates were identified, attention was turned to exami-
nation of the rearrangement. Consistent with the related
allylic rearrangement,7 the Cbz-functionalized phosphorimi-
date did not undergo efficient rearrangement under thermal
conditions but required a Pd(II) catalyst. The rearrangement
was sensitive to substrate concentration and catalyst load,
with higher yields obtained under more dilute reaction
conditions. Evidently, bimolecular decomposition pathways
are more readily accessible to the propargylic species in
comparison with related allylic phosphorimidates.7 As shown
in entry 3 of Table 1, when run at a concentration of 10
mM with 3 mol % Pd(II) catalyst, a 66% yield of allenamide
2a was isolated.
Figure 1. Outline of the rearrangement. In the first step, a
propargylic phosphite is formed through combination of a prop-
argylic alcohol with an activated trivalent phosphorus species in
the presence of mild base. This can be converted to a phospho-
rimidate via a Staudinger reduction with an azide. This species can
then undergo a transition-metal-catalyzed rearrangement to form a
fully protected allenamide. A possible side reaction is formation
of an allenyl phosphorus species via rearrangement of the propar-
gylic phosphite.
allylic systems,7,11,12 that regio- and stereochemistry would
be highly conserved in this reaction.
Application of these conditions to a more substituted
propargylic phosphorimidate derived from but-2-yn-1-ol
A complicating factor in the development of the phos-
phorimidate rearrangement is the well-documented spontane-
ous [2,3]-rearrangement of propargylic phosphites and
(10) (a) Overman, L. E.; Marlowe, C. K.; Clizbe, L. A. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1979, 599. (b) Overman, L. E.; Clizbe, L. A.; Freerks, R. L.; Marlowe,
C. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 2807. (c) Padwa, A.; Cohen, L. A. J.
Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 399. (d) Ranganathan, D.; Rathi, R.; Rathi, R.;
Kesavan, K.; Singh, W. P. Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 4873.
(8) (a) Frantz, D. E.; Fa¨ssler, R.; Carreira, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 1806. (b) Helal, C. J.; Magriotis, P. A.; Corey, E. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 10938. (c) Brown, H. C.; Ramachandran, P. V. Acc.
Chem. Res. 1992, 25, 16, and references therein.
(11) Lee, E. E.; Batey, R. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1865.
(12) (a) Overman, L. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1984, 23, 579. (b) Itami,
K.; Yamazaki, D.; Yoshida, J. Org. Lett. 2003, 2161.
(9) Hashmi, A. S. K. Modern Allene Chemistry; Kraus, N., Hashmi,
A. S. K., Eds.; Wiley-VCH; Weinheim, 2004; Vol. 1, pp 29-33.
(13) Mark, V. Mechanisms of Molecular Migrations; Thyagarajan, B. S.,
Ed.; Wiley Interscience: New York, 1971; Vol. 2, pp 319-437.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 11, 2010
2575