S. Banerjee et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 4505–4508
4507
azeteochlorin 10Ni are the signals for the methyl group (d, 1.23, 3H
and 30.0 ppm, respectively) and the sp3-azete position (q, 4.99, 1H
and 45.0 ppm, respectively; see also Supplementary data). The
methyl group located on one face of the porphyrin causes a face
differentiation at the ortho-positions of the flanking phenyl groups.
Evidently, phenyl rotation is slow on the NMR time scale.
its b- or the phenyl positions, particularly as the method used
was firstly reported for the b-formylation of 5Ni.
A comparison of the Electronic absorption spectrum of 10Ni to
that of a typical Ni(II) chlorin [tetraphenyl-2,3-dihydroxychlorina-
to]Ni(II) and that of the metalloporphyrin 5Ni clearly demonstrates
that it is based on the relative intensity of the Q-band with respect
to the Soret band and the Q-band shapes and positions, metallo-
chlorin-like (Fig. 2). However, the Soret band is ꢀ10 nm hypsochro-
mically shifted as compared to the corresponding band of the
chlorin and Ni(II) porphyrin 5Ni. We interpret this blue-shift as a
spectroscopic signature for the (projected)18 planarity of the sys-
tem compared to the ruffled conformation of the chlorin and the
porphyrin.19 As expected, the spectral features of Zaleski’s azeteo-
Although the two-step conversion of monoaldehyde 7Ni to 10Ni
is high yielding and straightforward, the preparation of 7Ni is
fraught with problems: it cannot be prepared efficiently by
mono-deformylation of secochlorin bisaldehyde 6Ni (itself readily
available from the corresponding diol chlorin,6 which itself is avail-
able in gram-scales from the corresponding porphyrin by an OsO4-
mediated dihydroxylation reaction).13 This is because the reaction
of bisaldehyde 6Ni with excess Wilkinson’s catalyst in refluxing
PhCN generates chlorophin 8Ni in 60% isolated yields, but monoal-
dehyde 7Ni in only about 12% yields.6 In other words, the first
deformylation is much slower than the second, greatly inhibiting
the generation of larger quantities (e.g., 25 mg batches) of 7Ni. In
the attempts to optimize the reaction conditions, we varied the
solvents (using mixtures of varying ratios of dry PhCN and PhCH3)
and reduced the stoichiometric ratio of Wilkinson’s catalyst ini-
tially used (down to 1.0 equiv with a batch-wise addition of further
1.0 equiv over the course of 3 days at reflux temperatures; for de-
tails, see Supplementary data). In the best of circumstances, this al-
lowed the isolation of 9% of 7Ni, with up to 30% recovery of the
starting material 6Ni. The extended reaction times also led to the
loss of the brown-green 7Ni as it is converted to the turquoise alco-
hol 3Ni in ꢀ7% yield (this represents an improvement over the pre-
viously described formation,6 but still does not constitute a
practical synthesis).
chlorin ester 4Ni (DSoret = À2 nm,
D
kmax = À3 nm)7,9 and alcohol
3Ni (DSoret = 2 nm,
those of 10Ni.
Dkmax = 9 nm) are overall similar compared to
In summary, an improved Vilsmeier–Haack formylation of chlo-
rophin results in the efficient formation of monoformyl chlorophin
7Ni. This aldehyde is susceptible to a ring-closing reaction using
the addition of methyl-Grignard, followed by an acid-catalyzed
ring-closing step to form azeteochlorin 10Ni. This reaction ex-
plores the high reactivity of the
a-position of the chlorophin to-
ward electrophilic substitution. This work points toward a novel
strategy for the construction of novel pyrrole-contracted porphyri-
noids. The optical properties of 10Ni are suggestive of the presence
of a planar macrocycle, providing an additional evidence for an in-
creased rigidity of the azeteoporphyrin/chlorin chromophore when
compared to the corresponding porphyrins/chlorins.
Acknowledgments
Since we failed to skew the product ratios of the deformylation
reaction toward the monoformyl product 7Ni, we revisited the
Vilsmeier–Haack formylation of 8Ni that, in an earlier report,6
did not proceed satisfactorily (Scheme 2). When we used a much
lower ratio of Vilsmeier reagent (chloroiminium formed from
DMF and POCl3) to substrate than that previously described and
switched the solvent to CHCl3 under reflux conditions for short
periods of time (5–10 min),17 we were able to obtain the mono-
formylated product in up to 45% isolated yields (for details, see
Supplementary data). Despite no 8Ni can be recovered from the
reaction and two minor unidentified side products formed, the
reaction has the advantage of allowing the preparation of 10 mg
This work was supported by the NSF (CHE-0517782 and CMMI-
0730826) and the US Air Force (through a stipend to M.A.H.).
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (procedure for the conversion of 7Ni to
10Ni via 9Ni and for the optimized Vilsmeier–Haak mono-formyla-
tion of 8Ni to provide 7Ni, including corresponding spectroscopic
data of the novel compounds and reproductions of key spectra)
associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at
batches of 7Ni (using 20 Â 20 cm, 500
lm silica gel preparative
chromatography plates for the isolation of the product). The selec-
References and notes
tivity of the formylation reaction provides another indication for
1. Representative reviews of porphyrins in photomedicine: (a) Sternberg, E. D.;
Dolphin, D.; Brückner, C. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 4151–4202; (b) O’Connor, A. E.;
Gallagher, W. M.; Byrne, A. T. Photochem. Photobiol. 2009, 85, 1053–1074; Light
harvesting: (c) Aratani, N.; Kim, D.; Osuka, A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1922–
1934; (d) Gust, D.; Moore, T. A.; Moore, A. L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 1890–
1898.
the high reactivity of the chlorphin a-position when compared to
2. (a) Lash, T. D.. In Kadish, K. M., Smith, K. M., Guilard, R., Eds.; The Porphyrin
Handbook; Academic Press: San Diego, 2000; pp 125–200; (b) Latos-Grazynski,
L.. In Kadish, K. M., Smith, K. M., Guilard, R., Eds.; The Porphyrin Handbook;
Academic Press: San Diego, 2000; pp 361–416.
3. Sessler, J. L.; Weghorn, S. Expanded, Contracted & Isomeric Porphyrins; Pergamon
Press: New York, NY, 1997.
4. The much longer and well known corroles might also be considered ring-
contracted porphyrins: Nardis, S.; Monti, D.; Paolesse, R. Mini-Rev. Org. Chem.
2005, 2, 355–374.
5. Crossley, M. J.; King, L. G. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1984, 920–922.
6. Brückner, C.; Hyland, M. A.; Sternberg, E. D.; MacAlpine, J.; Rettig, S. J.; Patrick,
B. O.; Dolphin, D. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2005, 358, 2943–2953.
7. Köpke, T.; Pink, M.; Zaleski, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 15864–15871.
8. Köpke, T.; Pink, M.; Zaleski, J. M. Chem. Commun. 2006, 4940–4942.
9. Köpke, T.; Pink, M.; Zaleski, J. M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 4059–4062.
10. Köpke, T. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Chemistry, Indiana University, 2008.
11. (a) Campbell, C. J.; Rusling, J. F.; Brückner, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6679–
6685; (b) McCarthy, J. R.; Melfi, P. J.; Capetta, S. H.; Brückner, C. Tetrahedron
2003, 59, 9137–9146; (c) Daniell, H. W.; Brückner, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2004, 43, 1688–1691; (d) Akhigbe, J.; Ryppa, C.; Zeller, M.; Brückner, C. J. Org.
Chem. 2009, 74, 4927–4933.
Figure 2. UV–vis spectral comparison of [tetraphenylporphyrinato]Ni(II) 5Ni
(dashed trace), [tetraphenyl-2,3-diolchlorininato]Ni(II) (solid trace), and [tetraph-
enylazeteochlorinato]Ni(II) 10Ni (dotted trace), all in CH2Cl2.