6242
G. Xu et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 51 (2010) 6240–6242
pathway for our reaction, we treated 1a with DBU in the methanol-
d4/toluene (1:10) and observed that both the protons of the thio-
phene ring were deuterated, demonstrating that the bisallene-
diradical mechanism is more plausible because the monoallene
intermediate and the [4+2] cycloaddition pathway should influ-
ence only one methylene group (Scheme 4).
141.0, 140.8, 137.0, 136.1, 129.1 (double carbon), 128.8 (double
carbon), 120.2, 116.8, 116.4, 50.4, 44.1, 34.8, 33.5, 26.7, 25.9,
21.0; MS (m/z) 280 (M, 60), 281 (M+1, 10); HRMS calcd for
C19H20S: 280.1286. Found: 280.1280.
Acknowledgment
With this result in hand, we examined the scope of the reaction
and obtained tricyclic thiophene derivatives in moderate to good
yields (Table 1).
Financial support was received from the Natural Science Foun-
dation of China (Nos. 20702046, 20972134).
Notably, the (3-cyclohexenylprop-2-ynyl)(hept-2-ynyl)sulfane
(1j) could not offer the expected product (entry 10, Table 1), prob-
ably because the presence of the aryl ring could stabilize the radi-
cal intermediate. Compared to the smooth Diels–Alder cyclization
of 3-(3-(hept-2-ynylthio)prop-1-ynyl)cyclohex-2-enone,5 this re-
sult may give indirectly further proof for the pathway proposed
in Scheme 3.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
In summary, we have developed a facile and efficient cycliza-
tion for the synthesis of tricyclic thiophene derivatives. As a me-
tal-free process, a result of the ready availability of the starting
materials and the simple and convenient operation, the type of
reaction presented herein has potential utility in organic synthesis.
1. (a)Handbook of Oligo- and Polythiophenes; Fichou, D., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim,
1999; (b)Polythiophenes—Electrically Conductive Polymers; Schopf, G., Kossmehl,
G., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, 1997.
2. (a) Ortiz, R. P.; Casado, J.; Hernande, V.; Navarrete, J. T. L.; Letizia, J. A.; Ratner, M.
A.; Facchetti, A.; Marks, T. J. Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 5023; (b) Cosimelli, B.; Neri,
D.; Roncucci, G. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 11281; (c) Hom, D. H. S.; Lamberton, J. A.
Aust. J. Chem. 1963, 16, 475.
2. Experimental section
3. (a) Rapaka, R. S.; Porreca, F. Pharm. Res. 1991, 8, 1; (b) Kaneko, H.; Yamato, Y.;
Kurokawa, M. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1968, 16, 1200; (c) Ronzoni, S.; Cerri, A.;
Dondio, G.; Fronza, G.; Petrillo, P.; Raveglia, L. F.; Gatti, P. A. Org. Lett. 1999, 1,
513.
2.1. General procedure for synthesis of 2
4. (a) Zhou, H.; Xie, Y.; Ren, L.; Su, R. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 356; (b) Dudnik, A. S.;
Sromek, A. W.; Rubina, M.; Kim, J. T.; Kel’in, A. V.; Gevorgyan, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2008, 130, 1440; (c) Sromek, A. W.; Gevorgyan, V. Top. Curr. Chem. 2007, 274, 77;
(d) Kim, J. T.; Kel’in, A. V.; Gevorgyan, V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 98; (e)
Zafrani, Y.; Gottlieb, H. E.; Sprecher, M.; Braverman, S. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70,
10166; (f) Zafrani, Y.; Cherkinsky, M.; Gottlieb, H. E.; Braverman, S. Tetrahedron
2003, 59, 2641; (g) Braverman, S.; Cherkinsky, M.; Birsa, M. L.; Zafrani, Y. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2002, 18, 3198; (h) Braverman, S.; Zafrani, Y.; Gottlieb, H. E.
Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 9177; (i) Peng, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J. J. Org.
Chem. 2007, 72, 1192; (j) Peng, L.; Zhang, X.; Ma, M.; Wang, J. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2007, 46, 1905; (k) Peng, L.; Zhang, X.; Ma, J.; Zhong, Z.; Wang, J. Org. Lett.
2007, 9, 1445; (l) Zhao, X.; Zhong, Z.; Peng, L.; Zhang, W.; Wang, J. Chem.
Commun. 2009, 2535.
To 0.5 mmol of (3-cyclohexenylprop-2-ynyl) (3-p-tolylprop-2-
ynyl)sulfane (1a) was added 0.6 mmol of DBU in 2 mL of toluene
under a N2 atmosphere, followed by heating to 90 °C for 12 h. After
evaporation, chromatography on silica gel (eluent/petroleum
ether) of the reaction mixture afforded the desired product 2a in
a yield of 82%.
Compound 2a: yield: 82%, 115 mg; oil; 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3) d 7.19–7.14 (m, 4H), 6.84–6.83 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.33–
6.31 (m, 2H), 3.61–3.58 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 2.52–2.45 (m, 1H),
2.48–2.47 (m, 1H), 2.37 (s, 3H), 2.30–2.16 (m, 1H), 1.82–1.78 (m,
2H), 1.38–1.27 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) d 142.0,
5. Zhou, H.; Zhu, D.; Xie, Y.; Huang, H.; Wang, K. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 2706.
6. Garratt, P. J.; Neoh, S. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 3255.