derivatives;10 and NÀH insertion of metal carbene.1b,11
However, these methods suffer from some disadvantages
such as the use of a strong base, inaccessibility of the
substrates, and employment of a multistep synthesis.
Obviously, the direct R-amination of the readily available
β-dicarbonyl compounds is more convenient and efficient
for the synthesis of R-amido β-dicarbonyl compounds.
However, to our knowledge, this strategy has received
little attention and there are only two examples of direct
R-amination of β-dicarbonyl compounds. One is the
insertion reaction of in situ generated (ethoxycar-
bonyl)nitrene at the R-position of β-dicarbonyl com-
pounds, but in this case, the yield of the desired product
is low to moderate.12 Another is the conjugate addi-
tions of β-dicarbonyl compounds to azodicarboxylates.13
Herein, as part of our continuous investigations on oxi-
dation reactions induced by hypervalent iodine re-
agents,14 we report a mild and efficient method for the
direct and fast R-amination of β-dicarbonyl compounds
using PhIO as the oxidant and TsNH2 as the aminating
reagent in the presence of a catalytic amount of perchlo-
rate zinc hexahydrate.
10 min (entry 4). Other Lewis acids including Yb(OTf)3
4H2O, Mg(NO3)2 6H2O, and CuSO4 were also checked,
3
3
but none of them showed superior results compared
with Zn(ClO4)2 6H2O (entries 5À7 vs entry 4). Results
3
of the screening study of the amount of Zn(ClO4)2 6H2O
3
(Table 1, entries 8À12) indicated that 0.1 equiv of
Zn(ClO4)2 6H2O was sufficient for the completion of
3
Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditionsa
catalyst
(equiv)
time
yield
(%)b
entry
solvent
(min)
1
none
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CHCl3
2 h
20
10
10
10
7 h
7 h
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
20
48
56
81
86
69
45c
62d
86
85
87
85
67
78
83
50
50
50
2
BF3 Et2O(1.5)
3
3
LiClO4 (1.5)
4
Zn(ClO4)2 6H2O(1.5)
3
In our initial study, the direct amination of ethyl
benzoylacetate (1a) was examined using 1.5 equiv of PhIO
and 1.5 equiv of TsNH2 in dichloromethane at rt. It was
found that the reaction produced a complex mixture after
2 h and the expected aminated product ethyl 3-oxo-3-
phenyl-2-(tosylamino) propanoate (2a) was obtained
in only 48% yield (Table 1, entry 1). To improve the
efficiency of the reaction, several Lewis acids were tried
which were believed to be capable of activating both the
5
Yb(OTf)3 4H2O (1.5)
3
6
Mg(NO3)2 6H2O(1.5)
3
7
CuSO4(1.5)
8
Zn(ClO4)2 6H2O (0.7)
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
9
Zn(ClO4)2 6H2O (0.5)
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Zn(ClO4)2 6H2O (0.25)
Zn(ClO4)2 6H2O(0.1)
Zn(ClO4)2 6H2O (0.05)
Zn(ClO4)2 6H2O(0.1)
Zn(ClO4)2 6H2O(0.1)
CH3CN
CH3CCl3
THF
hypervalent iodine reagent and the substrate. BF3 Et2O,
Zn(ClO4)2 6H2O(0.1)
3
a normally used Lewis acid to activate PhIO, was first
tried, and the reaction afforded 2a in a slightly improved
yield (entry 2). The use of LiClO4 greatly facilitated the
reaction, which gave 2a in 81% yield within a very short
reaction time of 10 min (entry 3). The employment of
Zn(ClO4)2 6H2O(0.1)
3
3
Zn(ClO4)2 6H2O(0.1)
DMF
a The reaction was conducted using 0.5 mmol of 1a. b Isolated yield.
c The conversion of 1a is 67%. d The conversion of 1a is 82%.
Zn(ClO4)2 6H2O led to a more clean reaction, which
produced 2a in the highest yield of 86% also within
3
the reaction. When chloroform and acetonitrile were used
as the solvent, 2a was obtained in a slightly lower yield
compared with that using dichloromethane (entries 13À
14 vs entry 11). Other solvents such as 1,1,1-trichloro-
ethane, THF, and DMF were all less effective (entries
15À17 vs entry 11). Further investigation indicated that
the use of TsNH2 as the aminating reagent was essential
to the reaction. When methanesulfonamide was em-
ployed, the reaction provided the corresponding amina-
tion product in a low yield (38% after 30 min). As for
benzamide and acetamide, no desired amination product
was obtained from the reactions.
With the optimized conditions in hand (Table 1, entry 11),
we then investigated the substrate scope of this method
(Scheme 1). The methyl, benzyl, tert-butyl, and cinna-
myl benzoylacetate were all efficiently transformed to
their corresponding R-N-tosylamido products 2bÀ2e
in high to excellent yields. Substrates bearing either
electron-donating or -withdrawing substituents at the
para or meta positions of the phenyl ring of benzoyl
moiety were also smoothly converted to the expected
(11) (a) Bertelsen, S.; Nielsen, M.; Bachmann, S.; Jørgensen, K. A.
Synthesis 2005, 2234–2238. (b) Honey, M. A.; Blake, A. J.; Campbell,
I. B.; Judkins, B. D.; Moody, C. J. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 8995–9001.
(12) (a) Fioravanti, S.; Morreale, A.; Pellacani, L.; Tardella, P. A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 1171–1173. (b) Felice, E.; Fioravanti, S.;
Pellacani, L.; Tardella, P. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4413–4416.
(13) (a) Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Venugopal, C.; Padmavani, B.
~
Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 7507–7509. (b) Meseguer, M.; Moreno-Manas,
M.; Vallribera, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 4093–4095. (c) Nelson, J. H.;
Howells, P. N.; Delullo, G. C.; Landen, G. L. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 1246–
1249. (d) Evans, D. A.; Nelson, S. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 6452–
6453. (e) Juhl, K.; Jørgensen, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2420–
2421. (f) Marigo, M.; Juhl, K.; Jørgensen, K. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2003, 42, 1367–1369. (g) Saaby, S.; Bella, M.; Jørgensen, K. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8120–8121. (h) Terada, M.; Nakano, M.; Ube, H. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 16044–16045. (i) Kang, Y. K.; Kim, D. Y.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 4565–4568.
(14) (a) Zhao, X.-F.; Zhang, C. Synthesis 2007, 551–557. (b) Li,
X.-Q.; Zhao, X.-F.; Zhang, C. Synthesis 2008, 2589–2593. (c) Li, X.-Q.;
Zhang., C. Synthesis 2009, 1163–1169. (d) Yu, J.; Zhang, C. Synthesis
2009, 2324–2328. (e) Li, X.-Q.; Wang, W.-K.; Zhang, C. Adv. Synth.
Catal. 2009, 351, 2342–2350. (f) Li, X.-Q.; Wang, W.-K.; Han, Y.-X.;
Zhang, C. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 2588–2598. (g) Yu, J.; Tian, J.;
Zhang, C. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 531. (h) Cui, L.-Q.; Liu, K.;
Zhang, C. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 2258–2265. (i) Cui, L.-Q.; Dong,
Z.-L.; Liu, K.; Zhang, C. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 6488–6491.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 3, 2012
833