ChemComm
Communication
Fig. 6 Epi-fluorescence imaging of PC-3 living cells with compounds 3a
and 5. Top: cis,mer-[ReCl(CO)2(2)], 3a, 100 mM, 1% DMSO, 15 minutes.
Bottom: fac-[Re(CO)3(2)]+, 5, 50 mM, 2% ethanol, 15 minutes. (A) Brightfield
image, (B) green channel lex = 460–500 nm, long pass filtered at 510 nm,
(C) overlay of A and B.
Fig. 5 Overlay of HPLC chromatograms from the crude reactions between
triphos-Ph or 2 and [Re(CO)5]+ (UV, 220 nm) or fac-[99mTc(CO)3(OH2)3]+
(NaI, g-detector) to yield fac-[Re(CO)3(triphos-Ph)]+ (4) at 22.9 min, fac-
[
99mTc(CO)3(triphos-Ph)]+ (6) at 23.0 min, fac-[Re(CO)3(2)]+ (5) at 24.4 min
and fac-[99mTc(CO)3(2)]+ (7) at 24.5 min.
in PC-3 cells, which indicated an MI50 (the concentration
required to reduce mitochondrial metabolism to 50%) of
45 mM Æ 5 mM for complex 5, confirming its cytotoxic effect
(ESI†). Furthermore, MTT assays indicated that complex 3a was
innocuous up to 250 mM after 48 h incubation (ESI†). Moreover,
both 3a and 5 possess negligible cytotoxicity at the concentra-
tions required for detection via SPECT, confirming that they are
highly appropriate for use as imaging probes,11 and our work is
now focused in this direction.
conditions, the Bodipy phosphine, 2, produced fac-[99mTc(CO)3(2)]+
7 in similar conversion, giving a single major HPLC peak that
correlated with the rhenium analogue 5 (Fig. 5). The stabilities of 6
and 7 were examined by radio-HPLC using competitive amino acid
challenge assays (1 mM histidine or cysteine) to simulate an in vivo
environment ([PO4]3À 10 mM, pH 7.2, 37 1C). Analysis by HPLC
indicated that both complexes remained 497% stable up to 18 h;
no trans-chelation of the fac-[99mTc(CO)3]+ core in 6 or 7 with either
amino acid was observed during the study. The radiolabelling
yields, purity and stability of 6 and 7 indicate that the tridentate
phosphine ligand system is comparable for fac-[99mTc(CO)3]+ to
other potent tridentate chelates (e.g. histidine, bis(2-pyridylmethyl)-
amine [DPA]).9 Therefore, to the best of our knowledge, complex 7
represents the first example of a phosphine-based, multi-functional
imaging tool, combining (i) a tridentate phosphine for kinetic
stability, (ii) a fluorophore for in vitro imaging, and (iii) a radioactive
metal for in vivo imaging via g-detection by SPECT.
We thank Dr Dyszlewski at Covidien for providing the Isolinks
kits, the NIH/NIGMS (Institutional Award T32-GM008336) and
EPSRC for funding (EP/G005206/1) and the NMSSC, Swansea
for Mass Spectra. SIP and SWB thank the Royal Society, MRC
and STFC for support. We also thank Prof. Jon Dilworth for
rhenium salts and advice.
Notes and references
Radiolabelling of the complexes constitutes the first, crucial
step towards their use in nuclear medicine for in vivo tissue
imaging, but SPECT does not provide information at the
subcellular level due to resolution limitations (1–2 mm). In
contrast, optical imaging methods allow for the direct visuali-
sation of the uptake and localisation of complexes within cells
which often contributes to the understanding of the mecha-
nism of action of such probes in cellular environments, due to
the sub-micron resolution level.10 Thus, in a preliminary
screening, the rhenium complexes 3a and 5 were imaged in
prostate carcinoma (PC-3) cells (cultured as described in the
ESI†), by epi-fluorescence microscopy using single-photon exci-
tation between 460 and 500 nm and an emission filtered at
510 nm (Fig. 6). Remarkably, exchanging a chloride for a
carbonyl ligand renders the cellular behaviour of 3a and 5 very
different; whereas [ReCl(CO)2(2)]+ allows for high-resolution
imaging and enables visualisation of organelles without any
apparent cytotoxicity, fac-[Re(CO)3(2)]+, 5, on the other hand
causes some morphological changes. Further investigations
would elucidate the sub-cellular localisation of the rhenium
1 S. Liu, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2004, 33, 445; I. Santos, A. Paulo and
J. D. G. Correia, Top. Curr. Chem., 2005, 252, 45; P. D. Benny and
A. L. Moore, Curr. Org. Synth., 2011, 8, 566.
2 K. A. Stephenson, S. R. Banerjee, T. Besanger, O. O. Sogbein, M. K.
Levadala, N. McFarlane, J. A. Lemon, D. R. Boreham, K. P. Maresca,
J. D. Brennan, J. W. Babich, J. Zubieta and J. F. Valliant, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2004, 126, 8598.
3 L. H. Davies, B. Stewart, R. W. Harrington, W. Clegg and L. J.
Higham, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 4921.
4 C. Bianchini, A. Marchi, L. Marvelli, M. Peruzzini, A. Romerosa,
R. Rossi and A. Vacca, Organometallics, 1995, 14, 3203.
5 A. M. Bond, R. Colton, R. W. Gable, M. F. Mackay and J. N. Walter,
Inorg. Chem., 1997, 36, 1181.
6 R. Alberto, R. Schibli, A. Egli, A. P. Schubiger, U. Abram and
T. A. Kaden, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 7987.
7 A. Loudet and K. Burgess, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 4891.
8 J. C. Koziar and D. O. Cowan, Acc. Chem. Res., 1978, 11, 334.
9 A. Egli, R. Alberto, L. Tannahill, R. Schibli, U. Abram, A. Schaffland,
R. Waibel, D. Tourwe, L. Jeannin, K. Iterbeke and P. A. Schubiger,
J. Nucl. Med., 1999, 40, 1913; G. Liu, S. Dou, J. He, J.-L. Vanderheyden,
M. Rusckowski and D. J. Hnatowich, Bioconjugate Chem., 2004, 15, 1441.
10 P. A. Waghorn, M. W. Jones, M. B. M. Theobald, R. L. Arrowsmith,
S. I. Pascu, S. W. Botchway, S. Faulkner and J. R. Dilworth, Chem. Sci.,
2013, 4, 1430; B. Wang, Y. Liang, H. Dong, T. Tan, B. Zhan, J. Cheng,
K. K.-W. Lo, Y. W. Lam and S. H. Cheng, ChemBioChem, 2012, 13, 2729;
S. J. Butler, L. Lamarque, R. Pal and D. Parker, Chem. Sci., 2014, 5, 1750.
complexes into specific organelles. MTT assays were carried out 11 T. Skotland, Contrast Media Mol. Imaging, 2012, 7, 1.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 15503--15505 | 15505