K. Osakama et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 4199–4201
4201
2312; (d) Bocknack, B. M.; Wang, L.-C.; Krische, M. J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2004,
101, 5421–5424; (e) Nishiyama, H.; Shiomi, T.; Tsuchiya, Y.; Matsuda, I. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6972–6973; (f) Fuller, N. O.; Morken, J. P. Synlett 2005,
1459–1461; (g) Lam, H. W.; Joensuu, P. M. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4225–4228; (h)
Deschamp, J.; Chuzel, O.; Hannedouche, J.; Riant, O. Angew. Chem. 2006, 118,
1314–1319. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 1292–1297; (i) Zhao, D.; Oisaki, K.;
Kanai, M.; Shibasaki, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 1403–1407; (j) Zhao, D.;
Oisaki, K.; Kanai, M.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14440–14441;
(k) Chuzel, O.; Deschamp, J.; Chausteur, C.; Riant, O. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5943–
5946; (l) Ito, J.; Shiomi, T.; Nishiyama, H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2006, 348, 1235–
1240; (m) Shiomi, T.; Ito, J.; Yamamoto, Y.; Nishiyama, H. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 5594–5600; (n) Shiomi, T.; Nishiyama, H. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1651–1654;
(o) Bee, C.; Han, S. B.; Hassan, A.; Iida, H.; Krische, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 2746–2747; (p) Lipshutz, B. H.; Amorelli, B.; Unger, J. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2008, 130, 14378–14379; (q) Shiomi, T.; Adachi, T.; Ito, J.; Nishiyama, H. Org.
Lett. 2009, 11, 1011–1014; (r) Deschamp, J.; Riant, O. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1217–
1220; (s) Kato, M.; Oki, H.; Ogata, K.; Fukuzawa, S. Synlett 2009, 1299–1302.
3. (a) Sugiura, M.; Sato, N.; Kotani, S.; Nakajima, M. Chem. Commun. 2008, 4309–
4311; (b) Sugiura, M.; Sato, N.; Sonoda, Y.; Kotani, S.; Nakajima, M. Chem. Asian
J. 2010, 5, 478–481.
Scheme 2. Stereochemistry of the reductive aldol reaction.
4. Kotani, S.; Osakama, K.; Sugiura, M.; Nakajima, M. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3968–
3971.
corresponding aldol adduct with high syn-diastereo- and
enantioselectivities.
5. Quenching the reaction with D2O provided
(>99%, D).
a-deuterized product in 98% yield
In conclusion, we demonstrated a novel type of the enantiose-
lective reductive aldol reaction using a tertiary amine-mediated
conjugate reduction and an organocatalyzed aldol reaction. The
present reaction offered the aldol products with high diastereo-
and enantioselectivities. The NOESY analysis verified the (Z)-selec-
tive generation of trichlorosilyl enol ethers, which ensured high
syn-selectivity in reductive aldol reaction. This is the first example
of the enantioselective sequential reaction involving a tertiary
amine-mediated reduction. Efforts in our laboratory continue to
extend this strategy to other asymmetric reactions.
6. For reviews on Lewis base organocatalysts, see: (a) Denmark, S. E.; Beutner, G.
L. Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 1584–1663. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1560–
1638; (b) Orito, Y.; Nakajima, M. Synthesis 2006, 1391–1401; (c) Malkov, A. V.;
ˇ
´
Kocovsky, P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 29–36; (d) Benaglia, M.; Rossi, S. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2010, 8, 3824–3830.
7. For phosphine oxide-catalyzed enantioselective aldol reactions, see: (a) Kotani,
S.; Hashimoto, S.; Nakajima, M. Synlett 2006, 1116–1118; (b) Kotani, S.;
Hashimoto, S.; Nakajima, M. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 3122–3132; (c) Kotani, S.;
Shimoda, Y.; Sugiura, M.; Nakajima, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 4602–4605;
(d) Kotani, S.; Aoki, S.; Sugiura, M.; Nakajima, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52,
2834–2836; (e) Rossi, S.; Benaglia, M.; Genoni, A.; Benincori, T.; Celentano, G.
Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 158–166; (f) Rossi, S.; Benaglia, M.; Cozzi, F.; Genoni, A.;
Benincori, T. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 848–854.
8. The acidic condition might diminish the activity of the Lewis base catalyst. A
slight excess amount of the amine kept the reaction media basic to increase the
catalyst activity, leading to high yield and stereoselectivity.
Acknowledgement
9. Representative procedure for the reductive aldol reaction of ketone 1a and
aldehyde 2a: A solution of trichlorosilyl triflate in dichloromethane (2.0 M,
0.38 mL, 0.75 mmol, 1.5 equiv) was added dropwise to the solution of ketone
1a (125.0 mg, 0.6 mmol, 1.2 equiv) and dicyclohexylisobutylamine (237.4 mg,
1.0 mmol, 2.0 equiv) in dichloromethane (5 mL) at À40 °C. (S)-BINAPO
(32.7 mg, 0.05 mmol, 10 mol%) and aldehyde 2a (0.05 mL, 0.5 mmol,
1.0 equiv) were successively added to the mixture, which was further stirred
for 1 h. The reaction was quenched with sat. NaHCO3 (5.0 mL) and stirred for
1 h. After filtration through celiteÒ, the aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc
(2 Â 30 mL) and the combined organic layers were successively washed with
15% HCl (3 Â 20 mL), water (20 mL), sat. NaHCO3 (20 mL), and brine (20 mL),
and dried over Na2SO4. After filtration and evaporation, the obtained crude
product was purified by column chromatography (hex/EtOAc = 8:1, SiO2 10 g)
to furnish the aldol product as a diastereomeric mixture. The enantiomeric
excess was determined by chiral HPLC.
This work was financially supported by The Sasakawa Scientific
Research Grant from Japan Science Society.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
10. The conjugate reductions of enones bearing aliphatic substituents on R2 (Me,
iPr, tBu) resulted in low yields, see Ref. 4.
1. For reviews on reductive aldol reaction, see: (a) Guo, H.-C.; Ma, J.-A. Angew.
Chem. 2006, 118, 362–375. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 354–366; (b)
Nishiyama, H.; Shiomi, T. Top. Curr. Chem. 2007, 279, 105–137.
2. For enantioselective reductive aldol reaction, see: (a) Taylor, S. J.; Duffey, M. O.;
Morken, J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4528–4529; (b) Zhao, C.-X.; Duffey, M.
O.; Taylor, S. J.; Morken, J. P. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1829–1831; (c) Russell, A. E.;
Fuller, N. O.; Taylor, S. J.; Aurriset, P.; Morken, J. P. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2309–
11. Low reactivity of non-conjugated aldehydes has been observed for Lewis base-
catalyzed reactions with trichlorosilylated reagents due to the formation of the
corresponding O-silylated chlorohydrins, see: Denmark, S. E.; Wynn, T.;
Beutner, G. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 13405–13407.