challenge, and the domino reaction in particular has
received considerable attention. Reactions of this type
offer a wide range of possibilities for the efficient con-
struction of highly complex molecules in a single process
consisting of several steps, thus avoiding the require-
ment for complicated purification stages and therefore
allowing for considerable savings in the use of both
solvents and reagents. For these reasons, the domino
reaction has been used as a tool for delivering high levels
of diversity in targeted compound libraries.9
Small organic molecules such as the cinchona alkaloids,
L-proline, and their derivatives are readily available com-
mercial catalysts and have been used in various transfor-
mations with excellent yields.10 For example, L-proline
has been used in enamine-based direct catalytic asym-
metric Aldol,11 Mannich,12 Michael,13 DielsÀAlder,14 R-
amination,15 and Knoevenagel type reactions,16 as well as
an unsymmetric Biginelli reaction.17 Recently, L-proline
and its derivatives have been used in domino reactions;18
we also reported the synthesis of a series of heterocycles
using domino reactions catalyzed by L-proline.19 In the
current paper, we report a novel domino reaction for the
synthesis of pyrrolo[2,3,4-kl]acridine derivatives using
L-proline as the catalyst. The attractive features of the
current domino reaction include the novel construction of
the pyrrolo[2,3,4-kl]acridine skeleton and the direct CÀN
Table 1. Optimizing the Reaction Conditions for the Synthesis
of 3a
catalyst
(mol %)
t
yielda
(%)
entry
solvent
ethanol
(°C)
1
;
reflux
reflux
reflux
reflux
reflux
reflux
80
trace
23
2
ethanol
acetonitrile
chloroform
THF
L-proline (10)
L-proline (10)
L-proline (10)
L-proline (10)
L-proline (10)
L-proline (10)
L-proline (10)
L-proline (10)
piperidine (10)
phenylalanine (10)
L-proline (5)
3
22
4
52
5
33
6
1,4-dioxane
DMF
20
7
40
8
water
80
trace
82
9
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
80
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
80
57
80
49
80
80
L-proline (15)
L-proline (20)
L-proline (10)
L-proline (10)
L-proline (10)
L-proline (10)
80
74
80
70
40
11
60
20
100
reflux
84
90
(7) Kitahara, Y.; Mizuno, T.; Kubo, A. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 4283.
(8) Wang, F.; Liu, H, X.; Fu, H.; Jiang, Y. Y.; Zhao, Y. F. Org. Lett.
2009, 11, 2469.
a Yield was determined by HPLC-MS.
(9) (a) Tietze, L. F.; Brasche, G.; Gericke, K. M. Domino Reactions in
Organic Synthesis; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2006. (b) Tietze, L. F.; Brazel,
C. C.; Holsken, S.; Magull, J.; Ringe, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47,
5246. (c) Trost, B. M. Science 1991, 254, 1471. (d) Padwa, A. Chem. Soc.
Rev. 2009, 38, 3072. (e) Padwa, A.; Bur, S. K. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 5341.
(f) Huang, Y.; Walji, A. M.; Larsen, C. H.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15051. (g) Lu, M.; Zhu, D.; Lu, Y.; Hou, Y.; Tan,
B.; Zhong, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 10187.
(10) (a) Chandrasekhar, S.; Reddy, N. R.; Sultana, S. S.; Narsihmulu,
C.; Reddy, K. V. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 338. (b) Li, H.; Wang, B.; Deng, L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 732.
(11) Alcaide, B.; Almendros, P.; Luna, A.; Torres, M. R. J. Org.
Chem. 2006, 71, 4818.
(12) (a) Janey, J. M.; Hsiao, Y.; Armstrong, J. D., III. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 71, 390. (b) List, B.; Pojarliev, P.; Biller, W. T.; Martin, H. J. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 827.
(13) (a) Rasalkar, M. S.; Potdar, M. K.; Mohile, S. S.; Salunkhe,
M. M. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2005, 235, 267. (b) Kotrusz, P.; Toma, S.
Molecules 2006, 11, 197. (c) Kotrusz, P.; Toma, S. ARKIVOC 2006, 100.
(14) Ramachary, D. B.; Chowdari, N. S.; Barbas, C. F., III. Angew.
Chem. 2003, 115, 4365.
(15) Bogevig, A.; Juhl, K.; Kumaragurubaran, N.; Zhuang, W.;
Jorgensen, K. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1790.
(16) Hossein, A. O.; Elham, R.; Majid, M. H. J. Chem. Res. 2006,
246.
(17) (a) Yadav, J. S.; Kumar, S. P.; Kondaji, G.; Rao, R. S.; Nagaiah,
K. Chem. Lett. 2004, 33, 1168. (b) Mabry, J.; Ganem, B. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2006, 47, 55.
(18) (a) Kumar, A.; Maurya, R. A. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 1946.
(b) Indumathi, S.; Perumal, S.; Menendez, J. C. Tetrahedron 2011, 67,
7101. (c) Guo, S. B.; Wang, S. X.; Li, J. T. Synth. Commun. 2007, 37,
2111. (d) Jiang, H. F.; Mai, R. H.; Gao, H.; Zhu, Q. H.; Liu, X. H. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 4943. (e) Jiang, H. F.; Li, J. H.; Chen, Z. W.
Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 9721.
bond cleavage of an isatin, both of which were easily
achieved without the need for multistep operations.
We initially evaluated the domino reaction of the en-
aminone 1a, which was derived from the reaction of aniline
with 5,5-dimethylcyclohexane-1,3-dione, and isatin 2a.
The reaction mixture, which was composed of a 1:1
mixture of 1a to 2a, was tested under a variety of different
conditions. The results are summarized in Table 1.
The optimization process revealed that the reaction
could not proceedinethanol under catalyst-free conditions
(Table 1, entry 1). Pleasingly, when the reaction was
conducted in the presence of L-proline (10 mol %) in
ethanol, the target compound 3a was obtained in 23%
yield (Table 1, entry 2). To improve the yield, different
solvents were evaluated. The results indicated that toluene
provided much better results than ethanol, acetonitrile,
chloroform, tetrahydrofuran (THF), 1,4-dioxane, N,N-
dimethylformamide (DMF), and water (Table 1, entries
2À9). Several other organocatalysts were also evaluated
for their catalytic efficiency in the current reaction. In all
cases, 10 mol % of the catalyst was used and the reaction
was carried out in toluene at 80 °C. The results revealed
that L-proline provided a superior catalytic effect to piper-
idine and phenylalanine (Table 1, entries 10À11). These
results indicated that the presence of both secondary
nitrogen and carboxylic acid groups may be essential for
better catalytic activity.
(19) (a) Shi, C. L.; Shi, D. Q.; Kim., S. H.; Huang, Z. B.; Ji, M. Aust.
J. Chem. 2008, 61, 547. (b) Shi, C. L.; Chen, H.; Shi, D. Q. J. Heterocycl.
Chem. 2011, 48, 351. (c) Shi, C. L.; Chen, H.; Shi, D. Q. J. Heterocycl.
Chem. 2012, 49, 125. (d) Shi, C. L.; Wang, J. X.; Chen, H.; Shi, D. Q.
J. Comb. Chem. 2010, 12, 430. (e) Li, Y. L.; Chen, H.; Shi, C. L.; Shi,
D. Q.; Ji, S. J. J. Comb. Chem. 2010, 12, 231.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX