Below 20 K, a kink was observed in the χT product, which is
a typical signal of the non-diamagnetic ground state. To further
elucidate this phenomenon the field-cooled magnetisation at
different external fields was measured, see the inset of Fig. 3.
The molar susceptibility curve at lower fields show a ramp
below 7 K, reaching a maximum of 0.5 cm3 mol−1 at 2 K. The
onset of a sharp increase at lower fields referred to a spin-canted
antiferromagnetism with long-range ordering, which was further
confirmed by the ac susceptibility data (Fig. S1‡). Both in-phase
and out-of-phase ac susceptibility peak at 3.2 K without any fre-
quency-dependent behaviour.
Moreover, a hysteresis loop was clearly recorded at 1.9 K with
a coercive field of 110 Oe and a remnant magnetisation (MR) of
0.04 μB (Fig. 3), showing the typical behaviour of a weak ferro-
magnet. The linear increase of the M vs. H plot at higher fields
without saturation confirms this behaviour (Fig. S2‡). The
equation, tanα = MR/MS, was therefore used to measure the
canting angle α by taking MS = gS = 5 μB. The resulting α =
0.5° indicates a very small canting angle between two spin orien-
tations. Compared to the Fe–Ohydroxy–Fe bond angle α does not
suggest a collinear alignment of the bond direction and the prin-
ciple magnetic axis.
Indeed, the isotropic nature of the iron(III) ion does not favour
the spin-canting behaviour originated from the Dzialoshinski–
Moriya (DM) interaction,15 which tends to orientate the parallel
spins into a perpendicular fashion. Without a significant mag-
netic anisotropy the occurrence of the canted antiferromagnetism
mainly due to the lack of inversion-centre between the adjacent
iron(III) ions. The asymmetric hydroxy-carboxylato bridge
between the nearing metal centres contributes the main source of
DM interaction.
Bearing a net magnetic moment from spin-canting does not
necessarily lead to long-range collective behaviour. The presence
of the magnetic ordering in 1 suggests that some superexchange-
coupling interaction propagating through the chemical bonds does
exist regardless of the far separation of the chains. We took the
risk of over-parameters to extract this interchain magnetic inter-
action by appending a mean-field approximation term to eqn (2):
χ = χchain/(1 − zJ′χchain/Ng2μB2), where zJ′ accounts for the inter-
chain magnetic interaction. The best fitting between 20 and 320 K
leads to J = −20.3(2) cm−1, zJ′ = −1.1(2) cm−1, g = 2.16(1) and
R = 6.8 × 10−6. Interestingly, the quantity of the zJ′ agrees well
with the reported value of an e,e-trans-1,4-chdc bridge between
two titanium(III) ions,16 indicating a potential superexchange-
coupling pathway through the σ-bonds.
References
§Crystal data for 1: C8H22FeO5, M = 234.02, monoclinic, space group
P21/m (No. 11), a = 8.010(2), b = 6.8872(18), c = 8.569(2) Å, β =
108.232(5)°, V = 449.0(2) Å3, Z = 2, Dc = 1.797 g cm–3, Mo Kα (λ =
0.71073 Å). Completeness = 99.2% (to θmax = 27°), T = 223(2) K, total
reflections: 2447, unique reflections: 1054, μ = 1.671 mm–1, 76 para-
meters, R1 = 0.0380 (I > 2σ), wR2 = 0.895 (all data) and S = 1.038.
Bruker SMART Apex CCD diffractometer. The structure was solved by
direct methods and all non-H atoms were subjected to anisotropic refine-
ment on F2 using SHELXTL.
1 R. Georges, J. J. Borrás-Almenar, E. Coronado, J. Curély and M. Drillon,
One-dimensional Magnetism: An Overview of the Models, in Magnetism:
Molecules to Materials, ed. J. S. Miller and M. Drillon, Wiley, Germany,
2001, vol. I, p. 1, and references therein.
2 M. Kurmoo, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 1353.
3 R. Sessoli, D. Gatteschi and J. Villain, Molecular Nanomagnets, Oxford
University Press, Oxford (UK), 2006.
4 (a) C. Coulon, H. Miyasaka and R. Clérac, Struct. Bonding, Springer,
Berlin, 2006, vol. 122, p. 163; (b) H.-L. Sun, Z.-M. Wang and S. Gao,
Coord. Chem. Rev., 2010, 254, 1081.
5 Y.-Z. Zheng, M.-L. Tong, W.-X. Zhang and X.-M. Chen, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 6310.
6 (a) Y.-Z. Zheng, W. Xue, M.-L. Tong, X.-M. Chen and S.-L. Zheng,
Inorg. Chem., 2008, 47, 11202; (b) Y.-Z. Zheng, M.-L. Tong, W. Xue,
W.-X. Zhang, X.-M. Chen, F. Grandjean and G. J. Long, Inorg.
Chem., 2008, 47, 4077; (c) S. Hu, L. Yun, Y.-Z. Zheng, Y. Lan,
A. K. Powell and M.-L. Tong, Dalton Trans., 2009, 1897;
(d) Y.-Z. Zheng, M.-L. Tong, W. Xue, W.-X. Zhang, X.-M. Chen,
F. Grandjean, G. J. Long, S.-W. Ng, P. Panissoid and M. Drillon,
Inorg. Chem., 2009, 48, 2028.
7 H. Miyasaka and M. Yamashita, Dalton Trans., 2007, 399.
8 (a) Y. J. Kim and D. Y. Jung, Chem. Commun., 2002, 90; (b) W. Bi,
R. Cao, D. Sun, D. Yuan, X. Li, Y. Wang, X. Li and M. Hong, Chem.
Commun., 2004, 2104; (c) J. Lü, W.-H. Bi, F.-X. Xiao, S. R. Batten
and R. Cao, Chem.–Asian J., 2008, 3, 542; (d) W. Bi, R. Cao,
D. Sun, D. Yuan, X. Li and M. Hong, Inorg. Chem. Commun., 2003,
6, 1426.
9 (a) M. Kurmoo, H. Kumagai, S. M. Hughes and C. J. Kepert, Inorg.
Chem., 2003, 42, 6709; (b) M. Kurmoo, H. Kumagai, M. Akita-Tanaka,
K. Inoue and S. Takagi, Inorg. Chem., 2006, 45, 1627; (c) H. Kumagai,
M. Akita-Tanaka, K. Inoue, K. Takahashi, H. Kobayashi, S. Vilminot and
M. Kurmoo, Inorg. Chem., 2007, 46, 5949; (d) J. Chen, M. Ohba,
D. Zhao, W. Kaneko and S. Kitagawa, Cryst. Growth Des., 2006, 6, 664;
(e) A. Thirumurugan, M. B. Avinash and C. N. R. Rao, Dalton Trans.,
2006, 221; (f) M. Du, Z.-H. Zhang and X.-J. Zhao, Cryst. Growth Des.,
2006, 6, 390; (g) J. Lü, W.-H. Bi, F.-X. Xiao, S. R. Batten and R. Cao,
Chem.–Asian. J., 2008, 3, 542.
10 (a) F. A. Cotton, J. P. Donahue, C. Lin and C. A. Murillo, Inorg. Chem.,
2001, 40, 1234; (b) Y.-Z. Zheng, M. Speldrich, P. Kögerler and
X.-M. Chen, CrystEngComm, 2010, 12, 1057.
11 E. L. Eliel, N. L. Allinger, S. J. Angyal and G. A. Morrison, Confor-
mational Analysis, Wiley, New York, 1996.
12 The binding energy of these supramolecular interactions can reach up to
ca. 12 kcal mol–1, for details, see: J. W. Steed and J. L. Atwood, Supra-
molecular Chemistry, Wiley, New York, 2nd edn, 2009.
13 (a) J. Wang, L.-L. Zheng, C.-J. Li, Y.-Z. Zheng and M.-L. Tong, Cryst.
Growth Des., 2006, 6, 357; (b) J. Wang, Y.-H. Zhang and M.-L. Tong,
Chem. Commun., 2006, 3166; (c) Y.-Z. Zheng, W. Xue, S.-L. Zheng,
J.-B. Lin, M.-L. Tong and X.-M. Chen, Adv. Mater., 2008, 20, 1534;
(d) A. Thirumurugan, R. A. Sanguramath and C. N. R. Rao, Inorg.
Chem., 2008, 47, 823; (e) Z.-J. Lin and M.-L. Tong, Coord. Chem. Rev.,
2010, 255, 421.
In summary, by using mild hydrothermal synthesis the pure
e,a-cis conformation of the 1,4-chdc ligand can be integrated
into a 2D coordination polymer, linking a novel iron(III)-hydroxy
chain with spin-canted antiferromagnetism. We postulate that the
σ-bonding is the primary superexchange-coupling pathway of
weak inter-chain magnetic interactions, which leads to the estab-
lishment of long-range magnetic ordering below 4 K.
14 M. E. Fisher, Am. J. Physiol., 1964, 32, 343.
15 (a) I. Dzialoshinski, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 1958, 4, 241; (b) T. Moriya,
Phys. Rev., 1960, 120, 91.
16 L. S. Kramer, A. W. Clauss, L. C. Francesconi, D. R. Corbin,
D. N. Hendrickson and G. D. Stucky, Inorg. Chem., 1981, 20, 2070.
YZZ is grateful for the financial support by the “Young 1000
Plan” program and the Starting Fund by XJTU.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Dalton Trans.