inhibitors,2e and phosphodiesterase inhibitors.2f Several
procedures for transition-metal-catalyzed direct CÀH fun-
ctionalization of imidazoazines have been developed, notably
in the imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine3 and imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidine4
series. Remarkably, Guillaumet et al. have described the
first sequential functionalization of imidazo[1,2-a]pyridines
by implementing SuzukiÀMiyaura and direct CÀH cross-
coupling reactions.3b However, the imidazo[1,2-a]pyrazine
series remains almost unexplored since only one paper
reporting on the palladium-catalyzed direct CÀH aryla-
tion at C3 of the naked imidazo[1,2-a]pyrazine skeleton
with iodobenzene was recently disclosed by Chatani.5 Among
the available imidazo[1,2-a]pyrazine scaffolds, the readily
prepared 6-bromoimidazo[1,2-a]pyrazine flanked with a
methyl ether (1a) or a methyl thioether (1b) group at C8
position6 represent attractive candidates for sequential
coupling reactions.3b,7 Herein, we report an efficient proce-
dure for the sequential functionalization of 6-bromoimidazo-
[1,2-a]pyrazine 1a and 1b at C3/C6 positions through a
palladium-catalyzed one-pot SuzukiÀMiyauraÀdirect CH
cross-coupling sequence. To the best of our knowledge, this
work constitutes one of the rare successful palladium-
catalyzed direct CÀH functionalization conducted in the
presence of a sulfide group8 which could act as a poison of
palladium catalyst.9
within 3 h, and the expected 6-phenylimidazopyrazine 2a
was further isolated in quantitative yield (entry 1). The first
sequential selective C6-Br/C3-H double arylation was then
carried out by simply adding bromobenzene in the wake of
the initial SuzukiÀMiyaura cross-coupling reaction. The
resulting reaction mixture was then stirred for a further
18h whileraising the temperatureto120 °C. Pleasingly, the
expected diarylated imidazopyrazine 3aa was obtained in
fairly good 67% isolated yield (entry 2), along with a 20%
yield of the monoarylated intermediate 2a. This prelimin-
ary result is all the more interesting as no further addition
of palladium catalyst is required for the subsequent C3-H
functionalization step.
Table 1. Optimization of Reaction Conditionsa
entry
ligand
PPh3
base
yieldc (%) of 1a/2a/3aa
1b
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
Cs2CO3
K2CO3
0/99/0
Our study was initiated with the SuzukiÀMiyaura cou-
pling reaction between 1a and phenylboronic acid under a
palladium-based catalysis in the presence of Pd(OAc)2/
PPh3 and Cs2CO3 base in dioxane at 90 °C (Table 1). These
conditions previously proved to be effective in the direct
C3-H arylation of imidazoazines.4a The complete conver-
sion of the reaction (monitoring by GCÀMS) was attained
PPh3
0/20/67
Po-Tol3
0/50/47
PtBu3 HBF4
0/20/66
3
PCy3 HBF4
0/70/20
3
CyJohnPhos
CyJohnPhose
CyJohnPhose
0/0/99 (95)d
0/0/87 (85)d
0/23/68 (63)d
a Reaction conditions: A mixture of 10 mol % of Pd source, 20 mol %
of phosphine ligand, 0.2 mmol of 1a, 1 equiv of PhB(OH)2, and 5 equiv
of base in 1 mL of dioxane was heated to 90 °C for 3 h, and then 1.5 equiv
of bromobenzene was added and the resulting mixture was heated to
120 °C for a further 18 h. b 10 mol % of Pd source, 20 mol % of phos-
phine ligand, 0.2 mmol of 1a, 1 equiv of PhB(OH)2, 5 equiv of base, 1 mL
of solvent, 90 °C. c Yields determinated by NMR and GC analysis with
internal standard. d Isolated yields of 3aa. e 5 mol % of Pd source and
10 mol % of ligand were used.
ꢀ
(3) (a) Toure, R. B.; Lane, B. S.; Sames, D. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1979–
1982. (b) Koubachi, J.; Kazzouli, S. E.; Berteina-Raboin, S.; Mouaddib,
A.; Guillaumet, G. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 7650–7655. (c) Koubachi, J.;
Kazzouli, S. E.; Berteina-Raboin, S.; Mouaddib, A.; Guillaumet, G.
Synthesis 2008, 2537–2542. (d) Koubachi, J.; Berteina-Raboin, S.;
Mouaddib, A.; Guillaumet, G. Synthesis 2009, 271–276. (e) Singhaus,
R. R.; Bernotas, R. C.; Steffan, R.; Matelan, E.; Quinet, E.; Nambi, P.;
Feingold, I.; Huselton, C.; Wilhelmsson, A.; Goos-Nilsson, A.; Wrobel,
J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 521–525. (f) Koubachi, J.;
Berteina-Raboin, S.; Mouaddib, A.; Guillaumet, G. Tetrahedron 2010,
66, 1937–1946. (g) Kumar, P. V.; Lin, W.-S.; Shen, J.-S.; Nandi, D.; Lee,
H. M. Organometallics 2011, 30, 5160–5169. (h) Cao, H.; Zhan, H.; Lin,
Y.; Lin, X.; Du, Z.; Jiang, H. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 1688–1691. (i) Fu.,
H. Y.; Chen, L.; Doucet, H. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 4473–4478.
(4) (a) Li, W.; Nelson, D. P.; Jensen, M. S.; Hoerrner, R. S.; Javadi,
G. J.; Cai, D.; Larsen, R. D. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4835–4837. (b) Parisien,
M.; Valette, D.; Fagnou, K. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 7578–7584.
(5) Hyodo, I.; Tobisu, M.; Chatani, N. Chem. Asian J. 2012, 7, 1357–
1365.
A survey of different phosphines (entries 3À6) revealed
that 2-(dicyclohexylphosphino)biphenyl (CyJohnPhos)
displayed the best performance, providing the expected
diarylated imidazopyrazine 3aa in 95% isolated yield
(entry 6). Interestingly, no significant drop of the yield
(85%) was observed when using a catalyst loading as low
as 5 mol % (entry 7). When the reaction was performed
in the presence of K2CO3, diarylated imidazopyrazine 3aa
was obtained with a somewhat lower yield (63%) together
with the monoarylated imidazopyrazine 2a (23%), point-
ing out the superiority of Cs2CO3 in the CÀH bond activa-
tion step (entry 8).
The scope and limitation of this SuzukiÀMiyaura cross-
coupling/C3ÀH bond activation sequence was then inves-
tigated using the optimized procedure; namely Pd(OAc)2
(5 mol %), CyJohnPhos (10 mol %), Cs2CO3 (5.0 equiv) in
dioxane byusing variousarylboronicacids and arylhalides
(Table 2).
(6) Compounds 1a and 1b were prepared according to the literature
ꢂ ꢂ
ꢂ
procedures; see: Bradac, J.; Furek, Z.; Janezic, D.; Molan, S.; Smerkolj,
ꢂ
ꢂ
I.; Stanovnik, B.; Tisler, M.; Vercek, B. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42, 4197–
4201and ref 2e.
(7) For selected examples of one-pot palladium-catalyzed coupling
reactions, see: (a) Handy, S. T.; Sabatini, J. J. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1537–
1539. (b) Handy, S. T.; Wilson, T.; Muth, A. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72,
8496. (c) Zhang, X.; Liu, A.; Chen, W. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3849–3852.
Wong, N. W. Y.; Forgione, P. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 2738–2741.
(8) For selected examples, see: (a) Shabashov, D.; Daugulis, O.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 3965–3972. (b) Yu, M.; Xie, Y.; Xie, C.;
Zhang, Y. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 2164–2167.
(9) (a) Hegedus, L. L.; McCabe, R. W. In Catalyst Poisoning; Marcel
Dekker: New York, 1984. (b) Hutton, A. T. In Comprehensive Coordination
Chemistry; Wilkinson, G., Gillard, R. D., McCleverty, J. A., Eds.; Pergamon:
Oxford, U.K., 1984; Vol. 5.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 23, 2012
6013