ChemComm
Communication
Fig. 3 Selected 2D nOe excerpts of 2 (a) and 5 (b) displaying C-11 membered hydrogen bonds (CDCl3, 400 MHz and 500 MHz, respectively).
the (i + 5) residue along with the regular reverse turn, described
SSK, GP and ASK thank CSIR, New Delhi, for research
earlier. This intriguing conformational feature singles out 3 fellowships. This work was funded by NCL-IGIB, New Delhi.
among others in the series, raising its prospects of being used
for the development of foldamers with perfect back-to-back
Notes and references
hydrogen bonding.2
The results of solution-state NMR studies firmly suggest that
the solid-state conformation is prevalent in the solution state as
well. The characteristic inter-residual nOe interactions supportive
of the folded conformation are the diagnostic long range inter-
residual dipolar couplings between the N- and C-termini groups.
Some of the selected nOes (Fig. 3a) that support the reverse-turn
1 (a) R. P. Cheng, S. H. Gellman and W. F. DeGrado, Chem. Rev.,
2001, 101, 3219; (b) T. A. Martinek and F. Fulop, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
2012, 41, 687; (c) D. Seebach and J. L. Matthews, Chem. Commun.,
1997, 2015; (d) L. K. A. Pilsl and O. Reiser, Amino Acids, 2011,
41, 709.
2 (a) P. G. Vasudev, S. Chatterjee, N. Shamala and P. Balaram, Chem.
Rev., 2011, 111, 657; (b) G. Guichard and I. Huc, Chem. Commun.,
2011, 47, 5933; (c) C. Tomasini, G. Angelici and N. Castellucci, Eur. J.
Org. Chem., 2011, 3648 and references cited therein.
t
conformation of 2 are Boc (C16H) vs. NH3 and NH4, C16H vs.
3 The Fleet group reported diverse classes of sugar derived amino
acids: M. D. P. Risseeuw, M. Overhand, G. W. J. Fleet and
M. I. Simon, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2007, 18, 2001.
4 (a) T. A. Martinek, G. K. Toth, E. Vass, M. Hollosi and F. Fulop,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 1718; (b) D. Seebach, S. Abele,
K. Gademann and B. Jaun, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 1595.
5 S. De Pol, C. Zorn, C. D. Klein, O. Zerbe and O. Reiser, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 511.
C12H and NH2 vs. NH3. Similarly, some of the selected nOes
observed in 5 (Fig. 3b), which support its folded conformation
are NH2 vs. C2H, NH2 vs. Boc (C18H) and C15H vs. C18H.
t
Compounds 3 and 4 also display characteristic inter-residual nOes
supporting their folded conformation (ESI,‡ pages S42–S51). The
negligible chemical shift [Dd (NH) o 0.33 ppm (ESI,‡ pages
S29–S32)] observed in the DMSO-d6 titration experiments strongly
support the intramolecular nature of the amide protons involved
in the 11-membered hydrogen bonding in compounds 2–5.
The results of variable temperature studies of compounds 2–5
[temperature coefficients (Dd/DT) B 3.8 ppb) (ESI,‡ pages
S33–S36)] further support the strong intramolecular H-bonding
pattern observed in these peptides.
In conclusion, we could demonstrate that orthanilic acid
(2-aminobenzenesulfonic acid, SAnt) is a strong reverse-turn
inducer when incorporated into peptide sequences (Xaa-SAnt-
Yaa). All the designed peptides containing SAnt displayed
11-membered-ring hydrogen bonding, formed in the backward
direction of the sequence as seen in native four-residue b-turns,
clearly vindicating the significance of the conformational rigidity
offered by SAnt to efficiently promote folding. The results of
diverse structural perturbations carried out in-and-around the
turn segment suggest that this reverse turn conformation is
robust. Comparison of the crystal structures15 clearly revealed
that it is the typical torsional constraint of orthanilic acid (SAnt)
that is primarily responsible for inducing folding in peptides.
6 S. H. Gellman, Acc. Chem. Res., 1998, 31, 173.
7 (a) W. Seth Horne and S. H. Gellman, Acc. Chem. Res., 2008, 41, 1399;
(b) I. M. Mandity, L. Fulop, E. Vass, G. K. Toth, T. A. Martinek and
F. Fulop, Org. Lett., 2010, 12, 5584.
8 (a) P. Prabhakaran, S. S. Kale, V. G. Puranik, P. R. Rajamohanan,
O. Chetina, J. A. K. Howard, H. J. Hofmann and G. J. Sanjayan, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 17743; (b) K. N. Vijayadas, H. C. Davis,
A. S. Kotmale, R. L. Gawade, V. G. Puranik, P. R. Rajamohanan
and G. J. Sanjayan, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 9747; (c) V. V.
E. Ramesh, G. Priya, A. S. Kotmale, R. G. Gonnade,
P. R. Rajamohanan and G. J. Sanjayan, Chem. Commun., 2012,
48, 11205.
9 (a) D. J. Hill, M. J. Mio, R. B. Prince, T. S. Hughes and J. S. Moore,
Chem. Rev., 2001, 101, 3893; (b) A. Roy, P. Prabhakaran, P. K. Baruah
and G. J. Sanjayan, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 11593.
10 (a) T. A. Edwards and A. J. Wilson, Amino Acids, 2011, 1; (b) A. Patgiri,
K. Yadav, P. S. Arora and D. Bar-Sagi, Nat. Chem. Biol., 2011, 7, 585.
11 (a) S. Chatterjee, R. S. Roy and P. Balaram, J. R. Soc. Interface, 2007,
4, 587; (b) M. A. Schmitt, S. H. Choi, I. A. Guzei and S. H. Gellman,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 130.
12 R. M. J. Liskamp and J. A. W. Kruijtzer, Mol. Diversity, 2004, 8, 79.
13 C. T. Supuran, A. Casini and A. Scozzafava, Med. Res. Rev., 2003,
23, 535.
14 A. Parkin, A. Collins, C. J. Gilmore and C. C. Wilson, Acta Crystallogr.,
Sect. B, 2008, 64, 66.
15 CCDC 910069–910074 (1–6)‡.
c
2224 Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 2222--2224
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013