dienolate adduct 4, wherein a formal negative charge
would be delocalized over both R- and γ-positions with
respect to the ester moiety (Scheme 1). In analogy to the
reactivity of canonical dienolate intermediates,10 we con-
sidered the possibility of engaging the γ-nucleophilicity of
4, thereby leading to new transformations. Here, we report
a P(III)-mediated reductivehomocondensation reaction of
unsaturated keto esters emanating from intermediate 4
that evidence this proposed γ-nucleophilicity.11,12
Scheme 2. Reductive Trimerization of 5 with P(NMe2)3
As shown in Scheme 3, a range of E-benzylidenepyru-
vate esters with variations on both the ester group and the
aryl motif are suitable substrates. Substitution of the aryl
ring only modestly affects the reaction outcome, and yields
of the trimerization reaction across both electron-deficient
(9ꢀ11) and electron-rich (12ꢀ13) substrates are good. The
yield of the corresponding furanyl derivative (14) by con-
trast is significantly diminished. In all cases investigated,
the products, which contain three stereocenters and two
unsymmetrical acyclic double bonds, are formedas a single
observable stereoisomer.
Scheme 1. Vinylogation of KukhtinꢀRamirez Redox Adducts
Table 1. Screening of Reaction Conditions
As a point of departure, we investigated the reaction of
methyl E-benzylidenepyruvate 5 with tris(dimethylamino)-
phosphorus under typical KukhtinꢀRamirez conditions.
Specifically, P(NMe2)3 was added to a solution of sub-
strate 5 at ꢀ78 °C in tetrahydrofuran. Upon warming, the
formation of dihydropyran 6 was observed (Scheme 2).
This product, whose structure was confirmed by single-
crystal X-ray analysis, corresponds to a reductive trimer-
ization of substrate 5; it is isolated as a single diastereo-
isomer. In surveying this reactivity, we have found that
tris(dimethylamino)phosphorus is uniquely suited to this
transformation; trimethyl phosphite by contrast is not an
effective promoter (Table 1, entry 2). A range of solvents
were found to be serviceable, but reactions performed in
toluene were foundtobehighest yielding (Table 1, entry 5).
Consistent with the stoichiometry of the trimerization
process, which requires the consumption of two molecules
of tris(dimethylamino)phosphorus for each molecule of
dihydropyran formed, the use of 0.7 equiv of P(NMe2)3
relative to the benzylidenepyruvate substrate was found to
only minimally impact the observed yield.
entry
PR3
solvent
yield (%)a
1
2
3
4
5
6
P(NMe2)3, 1.05 equiv
P(OMe)3, 1.05 equiv
P(NMe2)3, 1.05 equiv
P(NMe2)3, 1.05 equiv
P(NMe2)3, 1.05 equiv
P(NMe2)3, 0.70 equiv
THF
71
THF
<5%
70
51b
78
Et2O
CH2Cl2
PhCH3
PhCH3
74
a Isolated yield. b Undetermined byproducts were observed.
A mechanistic proposal consistent with the observed
stereoselective reductive trimerization of E-benzylidene-
pyruvate esters is offered in Scheme 4.13 The sequence
is initiated by the KukhtinꢀRamirez addition of tris-
(dimethylamino)phosphorus to the unsaturated keto ester
substrate 15 giving oxyphosphonium dienolate intermedi-
ate 16.1 Subsequent conjugate addition of the nucleophilic
γ-position10ꢀ12 of 16 to an additional equivalent of sub-
strate 15, followed by intramolecular oxycyclization,
would then give dipolar intermediate 18. The trans stereo-
chemistry about the newly formed CꢀC bond would be
expected to be controlled by nonbonding steric interac-
tions in thestepwiseprocess. Thissequenceofeventswould
regenerate a reactive oxyphosphonium enolate, which
could then be expected to engage a third equivalent of 15
to produce 20 via stepwise polar cyclopropanation.5
(10) (a) Casiraghi, G.; Zanardi, F.; Appendino, G.; Rassu, G. Chem.
Rev. 2000, 100, 1929. (b) Soriente, A.; De Rosa, M.; Villano, R.; Scettri,
A. Curr. Org. Chem. 2004, 8, 993. (c) Denmark, S. E.; Heemstra, J. R.,
Jr.; Beutner, G. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4682. (d) Kalesse, M.
Top. Curr. Chem. 2005, 244, 43. (e) Casiraghi, G.; Battistini, L.; Curti,
C.; Rassu, G.; Zanardi, F. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 3076.
(11) The γ-nucleophilicity of allylic ylides is reported; see: (a)
Dauben, W. G.; Ipaktschi, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 5088. (b)
Corey, E. J.; Erickson, B. W. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 821. (c) Padwa, A.;
Brodsky, L. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 4199. (d) Moorhoff, C. M. Synlett
1997, 126. (e) Wang, Q.-G.; Deng, X.-M.; Zhu, B.-H.; Ye, L.-W.; Sun,
X.-L.; Li, C.-Y.; Zhu, C.-Y.; Shen, Q.; Tang, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 5408. (f) Zhu, B.-H.; Zhou, R.; Zheng, J.-C.; Deng, X.-M.; Sun,
X.-L.; Shen, Q.; Tang, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 3454.
(13) For deoxygenations by P(III) reagents, see: Rowley, A. G. In
Organophosphorus Reagents in Organic Synthesis; Cadogan, J. I. G., Ed.;
Academic Press: London, 1979; pp 295ꢀ350.
(12) For a related γ-nucleophilic intermediate, see: Winkler, T.;
Bencze, W. L. Helv. Chim. Acta 1980, 63, 402.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 8, 2013
1927