1866
T. Tamai et al.
LETTER
2001, 481. (d) Totani, K.; Nagatsuka, T.; Yamaguchi, S.;
Takao, K.; Ohba, S.; Tadano, K. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66,
5965. (e) Nagatsuka, T.; Yamaguchi, S.; Totani, K.; Takao,
K.; Tadano, K. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 2001, 20, 519.
(f) Totani, K.; Asano, S.; Takao, K.; Tadano, K. Synlett
2001, 1772.
R
C
N
O
O
3R or 4R
O
s-cis
O
O
Si
TBSO
(3) (a) For a recent review on [3+2] cycloadditions, see: Gothelf,
K. V.; Jorgensen, K. A. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 863. (b) For a
recent paper on the sugar-based stereoselective [3+2]
cycloadditions of nitrile oxide, see:Desroses, M.; Chéry, F.;
Tatibouët, A.; De Lucchi, O.; Rollin, P. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2002, 13, 2535.
OMe
Scheme 2 A plausible transition-state mechanism for the [3+2] cy-
cloaddition
(4) (a) Hassner, A.; Rai, K. M. L. Synthesis 1989, 57. (b) Rai,
K. M. L.; Hassner, A. Indian J. Chem., Sect. B 1997, 36, 242.
(5) All new compounds gave spectroscopic data (1H, 13C NMR,
IR, and HRMS) in agreement with the structures depicted.
Yields refer to purified sample by chromatography on silica
gel.
(6) The [3+2] Cycloaddition of 2 using Benzonitrile Oxide in
CH2Cl2; Preparation of Methyl 6-deoxy-4-O-[(5R)-3-
phenyl-D2-isoxazoline-5-carbonyl]-2,3-di-O-t-
enoate moiety), thus avoiding the steric hindrance occur-
ring from the C-3 TBS group. As a result, the R adduct 3R
or 4R was obtained exclusively.
We considered that the presence of a bulky substituent at
C-2 is not necessary to realize the observed high stereo-
selectivity. Thus, we next explored the role of the C-2 sub-
stituent in the [3+2] cycloaddition using a new chiral
template 9. The template 9 was prepared from tri-O-
acetyl-D-glucal.15 The [3+2] cycloaddition of 9 with
benzonitrile oxide proceeded smoothly at room tempera-
ture (Scheme 3) to provide the cycloadduct with a lower
dr of 77:23 in favor of the formation of 10R.16 The new
stereogenic carbon in the major adduct 10R possessed the
same R-configuration as that of the cycloadduct 3R.
Owing to the significant loss of the stereoselectivity in the
case of 9, the presence of the C-2 bulky substituent is
important and has a complementary effect on the stereo-
selectivity in the [3+2] cycloaddition of 2.
butyldimethylsilyl-a-D-glucopyranoside (3R). To a cooled
(0 °C) stirred solution of 2 (211 mg, 0.459 mmol) in CH2Cl2
(4 mL) was added benzonitrile oxide (274 mg, 2.28 mmol).
The mixture was stirred at r.t. for 4 h, then diluted with
EtOAc (20 mL), and washed with sat. aq NH4Cl (10 mL
× 3). The organic layer was dried over anhyd Na2SO4 and
concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by column
chromatography on silica gel (EtOAc–hexane = 1:40) to
give 262 mg (96%) of 3R as colorless oil. Compound 3R:
TLC, Rf 0.47 (EtOAc–hexane = 1:6); IR(neat): 3100–2800,
1750, 1600 cm–1; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d: 0.10, 0.11,
0.12 (total 12 H, 3s), 0.85, 0.93 (each 9 H, each s), 1.10 (3 H,
d, J = 6.6 Hz), 3.37 (3 H, s), 3.52 (1 H, dd, J = 11.2, 16.8 Hz),
3.67 (1 H, dd, J = 3.7, 9.2 Hz), 3.80 (1 H, dd, J = 6.3, 16.8
Hz), 3.83 (1 H, m), 4.01 (1 H, t, J = 9.2 Hz), 4.62 (1 H, d,
J = 3.7 Hz), 4.74 (1 H, dd, J = 9.2, 9.9 Hz), 5.14 (1 H, dd,
J = 6.3, 11.2 Hz), 7.40–7.70 (5 H, m); 13C NMR (75 MHz,
CDCl3) d: –4.49, –4.39, –3.39, –3.06, 17.32, 17.88, 18.41,
25.87 × 3, 26.12 × 3, 38.00, 54.92, 65.16, 71.62, 74.45,
78.12, 78.58, 100.06, 126.94 × 2, 128.77 × 2, 130.53 × 2,
156.37, 169.40; HRMS: m/z calcd for C28H46NO6Si2 (M+ –
OCH3): 548.2864, found 548.2872.
O
O
O
O
N
TBSO
O
10R
Ph C N O
Ph
CH2Cl2, rt, 4 h
O
O
O
O
TBSO
O
O
TBSO
N
9
10S
Ph
(7) The [3+2] cycloaddition was best achieved in CH2Cl2 (96%).
In benzene, the cycloaddition provided 3R in 92% yield, and
the dr of the adducts was 99:1.
Scheme 3
(8) We also conducted the Lewis acid (2 equiv)-mediated
cycloaddition of 2 with benzonitrile oxide. The results are as
follows: 1) BF3·OEt2/CH2Cl2/–78 °C/6 h (97% recovery of
2), 2) ZnI2/CH2Cl2/–78 °C/6 h (90% recovery of 2), 3)
Yb(OTf)3/CH2Cl2/–78 °C/6 h (27% of the adduct, dr = ca
6:1, 47% recovery of 2), 4) MgBr2/CH2Cl2/–78 °C to r.t./6 h
(49% of the adduct, dr = ca 7:1, 47% recovery of 2).
(9) Compound 4R: TLC, Rf 0.54 (EtOAc–hexane = 1:6);
IR(neat): 3100–2800, 1750, 1600 cm–1: 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3) d: 0.07, 0.09, 0.10 (total 12 H, 3s), 0.83, 0.92 (each
9 H, each s), 1.10 (3 H, d, J = 6.2 Hz), 1.22 (9 H, s), 3.14 (1
H, dd, J = 11.0, 16.9 Hz), 3.36 (3 H, s), 3.38 (1 H, dd, J = 5.9,
16.9 Hz), 3.65 (1 H, dd, J = 3.3, 9.2 Hz), 3.82 (1 H, dq, J =
6.2, 9.2 Hz), 3.98 (1 H, t, J = 9.2 Hz), 4.62 (1 H, d, J = 3.3
Hz), 4.70 (1 H, t, J = 9.2 Hz), 4.94 (1 H, dd, J = 5.9, 11.0 Hz);
13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) d: –4.49, –4.43, –3.39, –3.06,
17.30, 17.86, 18.42, 25.86 × 3, 26.14 × 3, 28.05 × 3, 32.80,
37.54, 54.92, 65.19, 71.60, 74.45, 77.81, 77.89, 100.06,
165.83, 169.88; HRMS m/z calcd for C26H50NO6Si2 (M+ –
OCH3): 528.3177, found 528.3147.
In summary, we have found novel and highly diastereo-
selective [3+2] cycloadditions realized on a D-glucose-
derived chiral template. By removal of the chiral tem-
plates, essentially enantiopure chiral isoxazoline deriva-
tives are prepared.
References and Notes
(1) (a) Cintas, P. Tetrahedron 1991, 47, 6079. (b) Seyden-
Penne, J. Chiral Auxiliaries and Ligands in Asymmetric
Synthesis; Wiley: New York, 1995. (c) Kunz, H. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 336. (d) Rück, K.; Kunz, H.
Chiral Auxiliaries in Cycloadditions; Wiley: New York,
1995. (e) Hultin, P. G.; Earle, M. A.; Sudharshan, M.
Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 14823.
(2) (a) Totani, K.; Nagatsuka, T.; Takao, K.; Ohba, S.; Tadano,
K. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1447. (b) Munakata, R.; Totani, K.;
Takao, K.; Tadano, K. Synlett 2000, 979. (c) Nagatuska, T.;
Yamaguchi, S.; Totani, K.; Takao, K.; Tadano, K. Synlett
Synlett 2003, No. 12, 1865–1867 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York